Theorem dfss3f 3922

Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfssf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfssf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfss3f	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dfss3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfssf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dfssf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	dfssf 3921	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		df-ral 3049	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1539   ∈ wcel 2113  Ⅎwnfc 2880  ∀wral 3048   ⊆ wss 3898

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2182

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2882  df-ral 3049  df-ss 3915

This theorem is referenced by:  nfss  3923  nfchnd  18521  sigaclcu2  34156  bnj1498  35096  heibor1  37873  ssrabf  45238  ssrab2f  45241  limsupequzmpt2  45843  liminfequzmpt2  45916  pimconstlt1  46827  pimltpnff  46828  pimdecfgtioc  46840  pimincfltioc  46841  pimdecfgtioo  46842  pimincfltioo  46843  pimgtmnff  46847  sssmf  46863