Theorem dfss3f 3906

Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfss2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfss2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfss3f	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dfss3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfss2f.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dfss2f.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	dfss2f 3905	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		df-ral 3111	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4i 281	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1536   ∈ wcel 2111  Ⅎwnfc 2936  ∀wral 3106   ⊆ wss 3881

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-v 3443  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898

This theorem is referenced by:  nfss  3907  sigaclcu2  31489  bnj1498  32443  heibor1  35248  ssrabf  41750  ssrab2f  41752  limsupequzmpt2  42360  liminfequzmpt2  42433  pimconstlt1  43340  pimltpnf  43341  pimiooltgt  43346  pimdecfgtioc  43350  pimincfltioc  43351  pimdecfgtioo  43352  pimincfltioo  43353  sssmf  43372