Theorem dfss3f 3987

Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfssf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfssf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfss3f	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dfss3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfssf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dfssf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	dfssf 3986	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		df-ral 3060	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1535   ∈ wcel 2106  Ⅎwnfc 2888  ∀wral 3059   ⊆ wss 3963

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1908  ax-6 1965  ax-7 2005  ax-8 2108  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2175

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2890  df-ral 3060  df-ss 3980

This theorem is referenced by:  nfss  3988  sigaclcu2  34101  bnj1498  35054  heibor1  37797  ssrabf  45054  ssrab2f  45057  limsupequzmpt2  45674  liminfequzmpt2  45747  pimconstlt1  46658  pimltpnff  46659  pimiooltgt  46666  pimdecfgtioc  46671  pimincfltioc  46672  pimdecfgtioo  46673  pimincfltioo  46674  pimgtmnff  46678  sssmf  46694