Theorem dfss3f 3912

Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfss2f.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfss2f.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfss3f	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dfss3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfss2f.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dfss2f.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	dfss2f 3911	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		df-ral 3069	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4i 277	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205  ∀wal 1537   ∈ wcel 2106  Ⅎwnfc 2887  ∀wral 3064   ⊆ wss 3887

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ral 3069  df-v 3434  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904

This theorem is referenced by:  nfss  3913  sigaclcu2  32088  bnj1498  33041  heibor1  35968  ssrabf  42664  ssrab2f  42666  limsupequzmpt2  43259  liminfequzmpt2  43332  pimconstlt1  44240  pimltpnf  44241  pimiooltgt  44247  pimdecfgtioc  44252  pimincfltioc  44253  pimdecfgtioo  44254  pimincfltioo  44255  sssmf  44274