Theorem dfss3f 3929

Description: Equivalence for subclass relation, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dfssf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
dfssf.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dfss3f	⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Proof of Theorem dfss3f

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfssf.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴
2		dfssf.2	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵
3	1, 2	dfssf 3928	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
4		df-ral 3045	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))
5	3, 4	bitr4i 278	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206  ∀wal 1538   ∈ wcel 2109  Ⅎwnfc 2876  ∀wral 3044   ⊆ wss 3905

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ral 3045  df-ss 3922

This theorem is referenced by:  nfss  3930  sigaclcu2  34089  bnj1498  35030  heibor1  37792  ssrabf  45095  ssrab2f  45098  limsupequzmpt2  45703  liminfequzmpt2  45776  pimconstlt1  46687  pimltpnff  46688  pimiooltgt  46695  pimdecfgtioc  46700  pimincfltioc  46701  pimdecfgtioo  46702  pimincfltioo  46703  pimgtmnff  46707  sssmf  46723