| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4526, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | feq1 6640 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 2 | feq1 6640 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4533 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ifcif 4467 ⟶wf 6488 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-ext 2709 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-rab 3391 df-v 3432 df-dif 3893 df-un 3895 df-ss 3907 df-nul 4275 df-if 4468 df-sn 4569 df-pr 4571 df-op 4575 df-br 5087 df-opab 5149 df-rel 5631 df-cnv 5632 df-co 5633 df-dm 5634 df-rn 5635 df-fun 6494 df-fn 6495 df-f 6496 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 31859 hoaddcom 31860 hoaddass 31868 hocsubdir 31871 hoaddrid 31877 hodid 31878 ho0sub 31883 honegsub 31885 hoddi 32076 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |