Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4525, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | feq1 6497 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
2 | feq1 6497 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4532 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ifcif 4469 ⟶wf 6353 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2795 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-clab 2802 df-cleq 2816 df-clel 2895 df-nfc 2965 df-rab 3149 df-v 3498 df-dif 3941 df-un 3943 df-in 3945 df-ss 3954 df-nul 4294 df-if 4470 df-sn 4570 df-pr 4572 df-op 4576 df-br 5069 df-opab 5131 df-rel 5564 df-cnv 5565 df-co 5566 df-dm 5567 df-rn 5568 df-fun 6359 df-fn 6360 df-f 6361 |
This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 29552 hoaddcom 29553 hoaddass 29561 hocsubdir 29564 hoaddid1 29570 hodid 29571 ho0sub 29576 honegsub 29578 hoddi 29769 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |