| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4529, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | feq1 6624 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 2 | feq1 6624 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4536 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ifcif 4470 ⟶wf 6472 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1968 ax-7 2009 ax-8 2113 ax-9 2121 ax-ext 2703 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1781 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2710 df-cleq 2723 df-clel 2806 df-rab 3396 df-v 3438 df-dif 3900 df-un 3902 df-ss 3914 df-nul 4279 df-if 4471 df-sn 4572 df-pr 4574 df-op 4578 df-br 5087 df-opab 5149 df-rel 5618 df-cnv 5619 df-co 5620 df-dm 5621 df-rn 5622 df-fun 6478 df-fn 6479 df-f 6480 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 31745 hoaddcom 31746 hoaddass 31754 hocsubdir 31757 hoaddrid 31763 hodid 31764 ho0sub 31769 honegsub 31771 hoddi 31962 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |