![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4587, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | feq1 6699 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
2 | feq1 6699 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4594 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ifcif 4529 ⟶wf 6540 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1798 ax-4 1812 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2109 ax-9 2117 ax-ext 2704 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 398 df-or 847 df-3an 1090 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1783 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2711 df-cleq 2725 df-clel 2811 df-rab 3434 df-v 3477 df-dif 3952 df-un 3954 df-in 3956 df-ss 3966 df-nul 4324 df-if 4530 df-sn 4630 df-pr 4632 df-op 4636 df-br 5150 df-opab 5212 df-rel 5684 df-cnv 5685 df-co 5686 df-dm 5687 df-rn 5688 df-fun 6546 df-fn 6547 df-f 6548 |
This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 31026 hoaddcom 31027 hoaddass 31035 hocsubdir 31038 hoaddrid 31044 hodid 31045 ho0sub 31050 honegsub 31052 hoddi 31243 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |