![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4544, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | feq1 6649 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
2 | feq1 6649 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4551 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ifcif 4486 ⟶wf 6492 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1913 ax-6 1971 ax-7 2011 ax-8 2108 ax-9 2116 ax-ext 2707 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 397 df-or 846 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1544 df-fal 1554 df-ex 1782 df-sb 2068 df-clab 2714 df-cleq 2728 df-clel 2814 df-rab 3408 df-v 3447 df-dif 3913 df-un 3915 df-in 3917 df-ss 3927 df-nul 4283 df-if 4487 df-sn 4587 df-pr 4589 df-op 4593 df-br 5106 df-opab 5168 df-rel 5640 df-cnv 5641 df-co 5642 df-dm 5643 df-rn 5644 df-fun 6498 df-fn 6499 df-f 6500 |
This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 30662 hoaddcom 30663 hoaddass 30671 hocsubdir 30674 hoaddid1 30680 hodid 30681 ho0sub 30686 honegsub 30688 hoddi 30879 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |