| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4513, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | feq1 6633 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 2 | feq1 6633 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4520 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ifcif 4454 ⟶wf 6481 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2121 ax-9 2129 ax-ext 2711 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 854 df-3an 1094 df-tru 1550 df-fal 1560 df-ex 1787 df-sb 2074 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2814 df-rab 3392 df-v 3433 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-ss 3900 df-nul 4262 df-if 4455 df-sn 4556 df-pr 4558 df-op 4562 df-br 5073 df-opab 5135 df-rel 5625 df-cnv 5626 df-co 5627 df-dm 5628 df-rn 5629 df-fun 6487 df-fn 6488 df-f 6489 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 31862 hoaddcom 31863 hoaddass 31871 hocsubdir 31874 hoaddrid 31880 hodid 31881 ho0sub 31886 honegsub 31888 hoddi 32079 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |