| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4546, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | feq1 6683 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 2 | feq1 6683 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4553 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ifcif 4487 ⟶wf 6532 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-ext 2735 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-sb 2097 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-ss 3922 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-rn 5672 df-fun 6538 df-fn 6539 df-f 6540 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 32125 hoaddcom 32126 hoaddass 32134 hocsubdir 32137 hoaddrid 32143 hodid 32144 ho0sub 32149 honegsub 32151 hoddi 32342 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |