![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4606, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | feq1 6728 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
2 | feq1 6728 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4613 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ifcif 4548 ⟶wf 6569 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2711 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 847 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1540 df-fal 1550 df-ex 1778 df-sb 2065 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2732 df-clel 2819 df-rab 3444 df-v 3490 df-dif 3979 df-un 3981 df-ss 3993 df-nul 4353 df-if 4549 df-sn 4649 df-pr 4651 df-op 4655 df-br 5167 df-opab 5229 df-rel 5707 df-cnv 5708 df-co 5709 df-dm 5710 df-rn 5711 df-fun 6575 df-fn 6576 df-f 6577 |
This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 31805 hoaddcom 31806 hoaddass 31814 hocsubdir 31817 hoaddrid 31823 hodid 31824 ho0sub 31829 honegsub 31831 hoddi 32022 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |