| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > elimf | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Eliminate a mapping hypothesis for the weak deduction theorem dedth 4536, when a special case 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 is provable, in order to convert 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 from a hypothesis to an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-2006.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf.1 | ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elimf | ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | feq1 6664 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐹 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 2 | feq1 6664 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐺 = if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺) → (𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵)) | |
| 3 | elimf.1 | . 2 ⊢ 𝐺:𝐴⟶𝐵 | |
| 4 | 1, 2, 3 | elimhyp 4543 | 1 ⊢ if(𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐺):𝐴⟶𝐵 |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ifcif 4477 ⟶wf 6512 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1814 ax-4 1828 ax-5 1929 ax-6 1986 ax-7 2027 ax-8 2143 ax-9 2151 ax-ext 2733 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3an 1099 df-tru 1562 df-fal 1572 df-ex 1799 df-sb 2090 df-clab 2740 df-cleq 2753 df-clel 2836 df-rab 3414 df-v 3455 df-dif 3905 df-un 3907 df-ss 3919 df-nul 4284 df-if 4478 df-sn 4580 df-pr 4582 df-op 4586 df-br 5098 df-opab 5160 df-rel 5650 df-cnv 5651 df-co 5652 df-dm 5653 df-rn 5654 df-fun 6518 df-fn 6519 df-f 6520 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hosubcl 31933 hoaddcom 31934 hoaddass 31942 hocsubdir 31945 hoaddrid 31951 hodid 31952 ho0sub 31957 honegsub 31959 hoddi 32150 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |