Theorem ello1 15565

Description: Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ello1	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑚,𝑦,𝐹

Proof of Theorem ello1

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmeq 5894	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → dom 𝑓 = dom 𝐹)
2	1	ineq1d 4180	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)))
3		fveq1 6881	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
4	3	breq1d 5123	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
5	2, 4	raleqbidv 3345	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
6	5	2rexbidv 3236	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
7		df-lo1 15541	. 2 ⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
8	6, 7	elrab2 3663	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1567   ∈ wcel 2149  ∀wral 3085  ∃wrex 3095   ∩ cin 3912   class class class wbr 5113  dom cdm 5662  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7411   ↑_pm cpm 8824  ℝcr 11098  +∞cpnf 11239   ≤ cle 11243  [,)cico 13373  ≤𝑂(1)clo1 15537

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-8 2151  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1103  df-tru 1570  df-fal 1580  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761  df-clel 2844  df-ral 3086  df-rex 3096  df-rab 3424  df-v 3465  df-dif 3916  df-un 3918  df-in 3920  df-ss 3930  df-nul 4295  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4877  df-br 5114  df-dm 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fv 6545  df-lo1 15541

This theorem is referenced by:  ello12  15566  lo1f  15568  lo1dm  15569