Theorem ello1 15536

Description: Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ello1	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑚,𝑦,𝐹

Proof of Theorem ello1

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmeq 5888	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → dom 𝑓 = dom 𝐹)
2	1	ineq1d 4199	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)))
3		fveq1 6880	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
4	3	breq1d 5134	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
5	2, 4	raleqbidv 3329	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
6	5	2rexbidv 3210	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
7		df-lo1 15512	. 2 ⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
8	6, 7	elrab2 3679	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3052  ∃wrex 3061   ∩ cin 3930   class class class wbr 5124  dom cdm 5659  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410   ↑_pm cpm 8846  ℝcr 11133  +∞cpnf 11271   ≤ cle 11275  [,)cico 13369  ≤𝑂(1)clo1 15508

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-ext 2708

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2810  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3421  df-v 3466  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-uni 4889  df-br 5125  df-dm 5669  df-iota 6489  df-fv 6544  df-lo1 15512

This theorem is referenced by:  ello12  15537  lo1f  15539  lo1dm  15540