Theorem ello1 15468

Description: Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ello1	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑚,𝑦,𝐹

Proof of Theorem ello1

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmeq 5845	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → dom 𝑓 = dom 𝐹)
2	1	ineq1d 4148	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)))
3		fveq1 6826	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
4	3	breq1d 5082	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
5	2, 4	raleqbidv 3313	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
6	5	2rexbidv 3204	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
7		df-lo1 15444	. 2 ⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
8	6, 7	elrab2 3632	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547   ∈ wcel 2119  ∀wral 3053  ∃wrex 3063   ∩ cin 3882   class class class wbr 5072  dom cdm 5618  ‘cfv 6485  (class class class)co 7356   ↑_pm cpm 8764  ℝcr 11028  +∞cpnf 11167   ≤ cle 11171  [,)cico 13291  ≤𝑂(1)clo1 15440

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-3an 1094  df-tru 1550  df-fal 1560  df-ex 1787  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-rab 3392  df-v 3433  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4262  df-if 4455  df-sn 4556  df-pr 4558  df-op 4562  df-uni 4839  df-br 5073  df-dm 5628  df-iota 6441  df-fv 6493  df-lo1 15444

This theorem is referenced by:  ello12  15469  lo1f  15471  lo1dm  15472