Theorem ello1 15491

Description: Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ello1	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑚,𝑦,𝐹

Proof of Theorem ello1

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dmeq 5906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → dom 𝑓 = dom 𝐹)
2	1	ineq1d 4211	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)) = (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞)))
3		fveq1 6896	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑦))
4	3	breq1d 5158	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → ((𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
5	2, 4	raleqbidv 3339	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
6	5	2rexbidv 3216	. 2 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝐹 → (∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
7		df-lo1 15467	. 2 ⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
8	6, 7	elrab2 3685	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099  ∀wral 3058  ∃wrex 3067   ∩ cin 3946   class class class wbr 5148  dom cdm 5678  ‘cfv 6548  (class class class)co 7420   ↑_pm cpm 8845  ℝcr 11137  +∞cpnf 11275   ≤ cle 11279  [,)cico 13358  ≤𝑂(1)clo1 15463

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-ext 2699

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-sb 2061  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-rab 3430  df-v 3473  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4909  df-br 5149  df-dm 5688  df-iota 6500  df-fv 6556  df-lo1 15467

This theorem is referenced by:  ello12  15492  lo1f  15494  lo1dm  15495