P. 155 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 15401-15500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	abscld 15401	Real closure of absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ)
Theorem	sqrtcld 15402	Closure of the square root function over the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘𝐴) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	sqrtrege0d 15403	The real part of the square root function is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (ℜ‘(√‘𝐴)))
Theorem	sqsqrtd 15404	Square root theorem. Theorem I.35 of [Apostol] p. 29. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((√‘𝐴)↑2) = 𝐴)
Theorem	msqsqrtd 15405	Square root theorem. Theorem I.35 of [Apostol] p. 29. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((√‘𝐴) · (√‘𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sqr00d 15406	A square root is zero iff its argument is 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (√‘𝐴) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	absvalsqd 15407	Square of value of absolute value function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) = (𝐴 · (∗‘𝐴)))
Theorem	absvalsq2d 15408	Square of value of absolute value function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴)↑2) = (((ℜ‘𝐴)↑2) + ((ℑ‘𝐴)↑2)))
Theorem	absge0d 15409	Absolute value is nonnegative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	absval2d 15410	Value of absolute value function. Definition 10.36 of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) = (√‘(((ℜ‘𝐴)↑2) + ((ℑ‘𝐴)↑2))))
Theorem	abs00d 15411	The absolute value of a number is zero iff the number is zero. Proposition 10-3.7(c) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	absne0d 15412	The absolute value of a number is zero iff the number is zero. Proposition 10-3.7(c) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ≠ 0)
Theorem	absrpcld 15413	The absolute value of a nonzero number is a positive real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘𝐴) ∈ ℝ+)
Theorem	absnegd 15414	Absolute value of negative. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘-𝐴) = (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	abscjd 15415	The absolute value of a number and its conjugate are the same. Proposition 10-3.7(b) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(∗‘𝐴)) = (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	releabsd 15416	The real part of a number is less than or equal to its absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(d) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ℜ‘𝐴) ≤ (abs‘𝐴))
Theorem	absexpd 15417	Absolute value of positive integer exponentiation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴↑𝑁)) = ((abs‘𝐴)↑𝑁))
Theorem	abssubd 15418	Swapping order of subtraction doesn't change the absolute value. Example of [Apostol] p. 363. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) = (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)))
Theorem	absmuld 15419	Absolute value distributes over multiplication. Proposition 10-3.7(f) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 · 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) · (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	absdivd 15420	Absolute value distributes over division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 / 𝐵)) = ((abs‘𝐴) / (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abstrid 15421	Triangle inequality for absolute value. Proposition 10-3.7(h) of [Gleason] p. 133. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 + 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2difd 15422	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵)) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2dif2d 15423	Difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘𝐴) + (abs‘𝐵)))
Theorem	abs2difabsd 15424	Absolute value of difference of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘((abs‘𝐴) − (abs‘𝐵))) ≤ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)))
Theorem	abs3difd 15425	Absolute value of differences around common element. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) ≤ ((abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) + (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵))))
Theorem	abs3lemd 15426	Lemma involving absolute value of differences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐶)) < (𝐷 / 2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐶 − 𝐵)) < (𝐷 / 2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐵)) < 𝐷)
Theorem	reusq0 15427*	A complex number is the square of exactly one complex number iff the given complex number is zero. (Contributed by AV, 21-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ ℂ → (∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝑥↑2) = 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 = 0))
Theorem	bhmafibid1cn 15428	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2cn 15429	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity for complex numbers. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) Generalization for complex numbers proposed by GL. (Revised by AV, 8-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℂ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid1 15430	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. First result. Remark: The proof uses a different approach than the proof of bhmafibid1cn 15428, and is a little bit shorter. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) − (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) + (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
Theorem	bhmafibid2 15431	The Brahmagupta-Fibonacci identity. Express the product of two sums of two squares as a sum of two squares. Second result. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 1-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)) → (((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) · ((𝐶↑2) + (𝐷↑2))) = ((((𝐴 · 𝐶) + (𝐵 · 𝐷))↑2) + (((𝐴 · 𝐷) − (𝐵 · 𝐶))↑2)))
5.10  Elementary limits and convergence
5.10.1  Superior limit (lim sup)
Syntax	clsp 15432	Extend class notation to include the limsup function.
class lim sup
Definition	df-limsup 15433*	Define the superior limit of an infinite sequence of extended real numbers. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. See limsupval 15436 for its value. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 11-Sep-2020.)
⊢ lim sup = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ inf(ran (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝑥 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < )), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgord 15434	Ordering property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐵[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ) ≤ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝐴[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupcl 15435	Closure of the superior limit. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ∈ ℝ*)
Theorem	limsupval 15436*	The superior limit of an infinite sequence 𝐹 of extended real numbers, which is the infimum of the set of suprema of all upper infinite subsequences of 𝐹. Definition 12-4.1 of [Gleason] p. 175. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2005.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf(ran 𝐺, ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgf 15437*	Closure of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ*
Theorem	limsupgval 15438*	Value of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ℝ → (𝐺‘𝑀) = sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑀[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgle 15439*	The defining property of the superior limit function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2016.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((𝐺‘𝐶) ≤ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴)))
Theorem	limsuple 15440*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → (𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑗 ∈ ℝ 𝐴 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑗)))
Theorem	limsuplt 15441*	The defining property of the superior limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ* ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*) → ((lim sup‘𝐹) < 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℝ (𝐺‘𝑗) < 𝐴))
Theorem	limsupval2 15442*	The superior limit, relativized to an unbounded set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) = inf((𝐺 “ 𝐴), ℝ*, < ))
Theorem	limsupgre 15443*	If a sequence of real numbers has upper bounded limit supremum, then all the partial suprema are real. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑘 ∈ ℝ ↦ sup(((𝐹 “ (𝑘[,)+∞)) ∩ ℝ*), ℝ*, < ))    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐹:𝑍⟶ℝ ∧ (lim sup‘𝐹) < +∞) → 𝐺:ℝ⟶ℝ)
Theorem	limsupbnd1 15444*	If a sequence is eventually at most 𝐴, then the limsup is also at most 𝐴. (The converse is only true if the less or equal is replaced by strictly less than; consider the sequence 1 / 𝑛 which is never less or equal to zero even though the limsup is.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → (𝐹‘𝑗) ≤ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (lim sup‘𝐹) ≤ 𝐴)
Theorem	limsupbnd2 15445*	If a sequence is eventually greater than 𝐴, then the limsup is also greater than 𝐴. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2014.) (Revised by AV, 12-Sep-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐵⟶ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ*)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐵, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑘 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑘 ≤ 𝑗 → 𝐴 ≤ (𝐹‘𝑗)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≤ (lim sup‘𝐹))
5.10.2  Limits
Syntax	cli 15446	Extend class notation with convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝
Syntax	crli 15447	Extend class notation with real convergence relation for limits.
class ⇝𝑟
Syntax	co1 15448	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually bounded functions.
class 𝑂(1)
Syntax	clo1 15449	Extend class notation with the set of all eventually upper bounded functions.
class ≤𝑂(1)
Definition	df-clim 15450*	Define the limit relation for complex number sequences. See clim 15456 for its relational expression. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.)
⊢ ⇝ = {⟨𝑓, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑦 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)((𝑓‘𝑘) ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑘) − 𝑦)) < 𝑥))}
Definition	df-rlim 15451*	Define the limit relation for partial functions on the reals. See rlim 15457 for its relational expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ⇝𝑟 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ((𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ ℂ) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑤 ∈ dom 𝑓(𝑧 ≤ 𝑤 → (abs‘((𝑓‘𝑤) − 𝑥)) < 𝑦))}
Definition	df-o1 15452*	Define the set of eventually bounded functions. We don't bother to build the full conception of big-O notation, because we can represent any big-O in terms of 𝑂(1) and division, and any little-O in terms of a limit and division. We could also use limsup for this, but it only works on integer sequences, while this will work for real sequences or integer sequences. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ 𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝑓‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚}
Definition	df-lo1 15453*	Define the set of eventually upper bounded real functions. This fills a gap in 𝑂(1) coverage, to express statements like 𝑓(𝑥) ≤ 𝑔(𝑥) + 𝑂(𝑥) via (𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ↦ (𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑔(𝑥)) / 𝑥) ∈ ≤𝑂(1). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ≤𝑂(1) = {𝑓 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝑓 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝑓‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚}
Theorem	climrel 15454	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝
Theorem	rlimrel 15455	The limit relation is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ Rel ⇝𝑟
Theorem	clim 15456*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists an integer 𝑗 such that the absolute difference of any later complex number in the sequence and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ ℤ ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim 15457*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number function 𝐹 is 𝐶, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐶, in the real sense. This means that for any real 𝑥, no matter how small, there always exists a number 𝑦 such that the absolute difference of any number in the function beyond 𝑦 and the limit is less than 𝑥. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑧) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	rlim2 15458*	Rewrite rlim 15457 for a mapping operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim2lt 15459*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim3 15460*	Restrict the range of the domain bound to reals greater than some 𝐷 ∈ ℝ. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climcl 15461	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	rlimpm 15462	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ))
Theorem	rlimf 15463	Closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	rlimss 15464	Domain closure of a function with a limit in the complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	rlimcl 15465	Closure of the limit of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⇝𝑟 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	clim2 15466*	Express the predicate: The limit of complex number sequence 𝐹 is 𝐴, or 𝐹 converges to 𝐴, with more general quantifier restrictions than clim 15456. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))))
Theorem	clim2c 15467*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝑥))
Theorem	clim0 15468*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	clim0c 15469*	Express the predicate 𝐹 converges to 0. (Contributed by NM, 24-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ⇝ 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥))
Theorem	rlim0 15470*	Express the predicate 𝐵(𝑧) converges to 0. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	rlim0lt 15471*	Use strictly less-than in place of less equal in the real limit predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 0 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ+ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑧 → (abs‘𝐵) < 𝑥)))
Theorem	climi 15472*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(𝐵 ∈ ℂ ∧ (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶))
Theorem	climi2 15473*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐴)) < 𝐶)
Theorem	climi0 15474*	Convergence of a sequence of complex numbers to zero. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2014.)
⊢ 𝑍 = (ℤ≥‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑘 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹‘𝑘) = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⇝ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝑍 ∀𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑗)(abs‘𝐵) < 𝐶)
Theorem	rlimi 15475*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	rlimi2 15476*	Convergence at infinity of a function on the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℝ+)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ⇝𝑟 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐷[,)+∞)∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (abs‘(𝐵 − 𝐶)) < 𝑅))
Theorem	ello1 15477*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℝ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello12 15478*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello12r 15479*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (𝐹‘𝑥) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1f 15480	An eventually upper bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℝ)
Theorem	lo1dm 15481	An eventually upper bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	lo1bdd 15482*	The defining property of an eventually upper bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℝ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (𝐹‘𝑦) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	ello1mpt 15483*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1mpt2 15484*	Elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	ello1d 15485*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually upper bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))
Theorem	lo1bdd2 15486*	If an eventually bounded function is bounded on every interval 𝐴 ∩ (-∞, 𝑦) by a function 𝑀(𝑦), then the function is bounded on the whole domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	lo1bddrp 15487*	Refine o1bdd2 15503 to give a strictly positive upper bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦)) → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦)) → 𝐵 ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ+ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ≤ 𝑚)
Theorem	elo1 15488*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm ℝ) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (dom 𝐹 ∩ (𝑥[,)+∞))(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	elo12 15489*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo12r 15490*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐶 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) ≤ 𝑀)) → 𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1f 15491	An eventually bounded function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → 𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶ℂ)
Theorem	o1dm 15492	An eventually bounded function's domain is a subset of the reals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) → dom 𝐹 ⊆ ℝ)
Theorem	o1bdd 15493*	The defining property of an eventually bounded function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → (abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑚))
Theorem	lo1o1 15494	A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (abs ∘ 𝐹) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	lo1o12 15495*	A function is eventually bounded iff its absolute value is eventually upper bounded. (This function is useful for converting theorems about ≤𝑂(1) to 𝑂(1).) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (abs‘𝐵)) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))
Theorem	elo1mpt 15496*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo1mpt2 15497*	Elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2016.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐶[,)+∞)∃𝑚 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑚)))
Theorem	elo1d 15498*	Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set of eventually bounded functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ≤ 𝑥)) → (abs‘𝐵) ≤ 𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1))
Theorem	o1lo1 15499*	A real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually lower bounded and eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ -𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1))))
Theorem	o1lo12 15500*	A lower bounded real function is eventually bounded iff it is eventually upper bounded. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-May-2016.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑂(1) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵) ∈ ≤𝑂(1)))