| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > frirr | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A well-founded relation is irreflexive. Special case of Proposition 6.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| frirr | ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | simpl 488 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑅 Fr 𝐴) | |
| 2 | snssi 4753 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝐵} ⊆ 𝐴) | |
| 3 | 2 | adantl 487 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝐵} ⊆ 𝐴) |
| 4 | snnzg 4742 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → {𝐵} ≠ ∅) | |
| 5 | 4 | adantl 487 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → {𝐵} ≠ ∅) |
| 6 | snex 5412 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝐵} ∈ V | |
| 7 | 6 | frc 5626 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ {𝐵} ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ {𝐵} ≠ ∅) → ∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵} {𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅) |
| 8 | 1, 3, 5, 7 | syl3anc 1398 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵} {𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅) |
| 9 | breq1 5114 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) | |
| 10 | 9 | rabeq0w 4344 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝐵} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) |
| 11 | breq2 5115 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝐵)) | |
| 12 | 11 | notbid 321 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝐵)) |
| 13 | 12 | ralbidv 3190 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (∀𝑧 ∈ {𝐵} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝐵} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝐵)) |
| 14 | 10, 13 | bitrid 286 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ({𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝐵} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝐵)) |
| 15 | 14 | rexsng 4644 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵} {𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {𝐵} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝐵)) |
| 16 | breq1 5114 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (𝑧𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) | |
| 17 | 16 | notbid 321 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝐵 → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) |
| 18 | 17 | ralsng 4643 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑧 ∈ {𝐵} ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) |
| 19 | 15, 18 | bitrd 282 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵} {𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) |
| 20 | 19 | adantl 487 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦 ∈ {𝐵} {𝑥 ∈ {𝐵} ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} = ∅ ↔ ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵)) |
| 21 | 8, 20 | mpbid 235 | 1 ⊢ ((𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐵𝑅𝐵) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 ≠ wne 2960 ∀wral 3081 ∃wrex 3091 {crab 3418 ⊆ wss 3906 ∅c0 4286 {csn 4591 class class class wbr 5111 Fr wfr 5613 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-ext 2737 ax-sep 5259 ax-pr 5406 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-sb 2100 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-ne 2961 df-ral 3082 df-rex 3092 df-rab 3419 df-v 3459 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4287 df-if 4490 df-pw 4566 df-sn 4592 df-pr 4594 df-op 4598 df-br 5112 df-fr 5616 |
| This theorem is used by: efrirr 5643 predfrirr 6339 dfwe2 7779 bnj1417 35494 efrunt 36242 ifr0 45217 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |