Theorem iscomlaw 49394

Description: The predicate "is a commutative operation". (Contributed by AV, 20-Jan-2020.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iscomlaw	⊢ (( ⚬ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → ( ⚬ comLaw 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑀,𝑦   𝑥, ⚬ ,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem iscomlaw

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑜 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 490	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑜 = ⚬ ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
2		oveq 7428	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = ⚬ → (𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦))
3		oveq 7428	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑜 = ⚬ → (𝑦𝑜𝑥) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥))
4	2, 3	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑜 = ⚬ → ((𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑦𝑜𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))
5	4	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑜 = ⚬ ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ((𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑦𝑜𝑥) ↔ (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))
6	1, 5	raleqbidv 3334	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑜 = ⚬ ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑦𝑜𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))
7	1, 6	raleqbidv 3334	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑜 = ⚬ ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑚 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑦𝑜𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))
8		df-comlaw 49391	. 2 ⊢ comLaw = {⟨𝑜, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑚 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) = (𝑦𝑜𝑥)}
9	7, 8	brabga 5507	1 ⊢ (( ⚬ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑊) → ( ⚬ comLaw 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑀 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑀 (𝑥 ⚬ 𝑦) = (𝑦 ⚬ 𝑥)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076   class class class wbr 5102  (class class class)co 7422   comLaw ccomlaw 49389

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-iota 6496  df-fv 6549  df-ov 7425  df-comlaw 49391

This theorem is used by: (None)