Users' Mathboxes Mathbox for Alexander van der Vekens < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >   Mathboxes  >  clcllaw Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem clcllaw 43598
Description: Closure of a closed operation. (Contributed by FL, 14-Sep-2010.) (Revised by AV, 21-Jan-2020.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
clcllaw (( clLaw 𝑀𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)

Proof of Theorem clcllaw
Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑜 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-cllaw 43593 . . . 4 clLaw = {⟨𝑜, 𝑚⟩ ∣ ∀𝑥𝑚𝑦𝑚 (𝑥𝑜𝑦) ∈ 𝑚}
21bropaex12 5535 . . 3 ( clLaw 𝑀 → ( ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V))
3 iscllaw 43596 . . . 4 (( ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V) → ( clLaw 𝑀 ↔ ∀𝑥𝑀𝑦𝑀 (𝑥 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀))
4 ovrspc2v 7049 . . . . 5 (((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑀𝑦𝑀 (𝑥 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)
54expcom 414 . . . 4 (∀𝑥𝑀𝑦𝑀 (𝑥 𝑦) ∈ 𝑀 → ((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀))
63, 5syl6bi 254 . . 3 (( ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ V) → ( clLaw 𝑀 → ((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)))
72, 6mpcom 38 . 2 ( clLaw 𝑀 → ((𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀))
873impib 1109 1 (( clLaw 𝑀𝑋𝑀𝑌𝑀) → (𝑋 𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 396  w3a 1080  wcel 2083  wral 3107  Vcvv 3440   class class class wbr 4968  (class class class)co 7023   clLaw ccllaw 43590
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1781  ax-4 1795  ax-5 1892  ax-6 1951  ax-7 1996  ax-8 2085  ax-9 2093  ax-10 2114  ax-11 2128  ax-12 2143  ax-13 2346  ax-ext 2771  ax-sep 5101  ax-nul 5108  ax-pr 5228
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 843  df-3an 1082  df-tru 1528  df-ex 1766  df-nf 1770  df-sb 2045  df-mo 2578  df-eu 2614  df-clab 2778  df-cleq 2790  df-clel 2865  df-nfc 2937  df-ral 3112  df-rex 3113  df-rab 3116  df-v 3442  df-dif 3868  df-un 3870  df-in 3872  df-ss 3880  df-nul 4218  df-if 4388  df-sn 4479  df-pr 4481  df-op 4485  df-uni 4752  df-br 4969  df-opab 5031  df-xp 5456  df-iota 6196  df-fv 6240  df-ov 7026  df-cllaw 43593
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator