Theorem isoml 40561

Description: The predicate "is an orthomodular lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isoml.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
isoml.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
isoml.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
isoml.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
isoml.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isoml	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   ∨ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ∧ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ⊥ (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem isoml

Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6916	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = (Base‘𝐾))
2		isoml.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	eqtr4di 2816	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
4		fveq2 6916	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = (le‘𝐾))
5		isoml.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = ≤ )
7	6	breqd 5119	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
8		fveq2 6916	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (join‘𝑘) = (join‘𝐾))
9		isoml.j	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
10	8, 9	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (join‘𝑘) = ∨ )
11		eqidd 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
12		fveq2 6916	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (meet‘𝑘) = (meet‘𝐾))
13		isoml.m	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
14	12, 13	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (meet‘𝑘) = ∧ )
15		eqidd 2764	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → 𝑦 = 𝑦)
16		fveq2 6916	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (oc‘𝑘) = (oc‘𝐾))
17		isoml.o	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (oc‘𝑘) = ⊥ )
19	18	fveq1d 6918	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))
20	14, 15, 19	oveq123d 7472	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)) = (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))
21	10, 11, 20	oveq123d 7472	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))
22	21	eqeq2d 2774	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥))) ↔ 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))
23	7, 22	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)))) ↔ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
24	3, 23	raleqbidv 3338	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
25	3, 24	raleqbidv 3338	. 2 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
26		df-oml 40502	. 2 ⊢ OML = {𝑘 ∈ OL ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥))))}
27	25, 26	elrab2 3652	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080   class class class wbr 5108  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  Basecbs 17431  lecple 17479  occoc 17480  joincjn 18535  meetcmee 18536  OLcol 40497  OMLcoml 40498

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2102  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-br 5109  df-iota 6520  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oml 40502

This theorem is used by:  isomliN  40562  omlol  40563  omllaw  40566