Theorem isoml 40402

Description: The predicate "is an orthomodular lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
isoml.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
isoml.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
isoml.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
isoml.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
isoml.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isoml	⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐾,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   ∨ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ≤ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ∧ (𝑥, 𝑦)   ⊥ (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem isoml

Dummy variable 𝑘 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6888	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = (Base‘𝐾))
2		isoml.b	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
3	1, 2	eqtr4di 2813	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (Base‘𝑘) = 𝐵)
4		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = (le‘𝐾))
5		isoml.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
6	4, 5	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (le‘𝑘) = ≤ )
7	6	breqd 5113	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦))
8		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (join‘𝑘) = (join‘𝐾))
9		isoml.j	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
10	8, 9	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (join‘𝑘) = ∨ )
11		eqidd 2761	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
12		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (meet‘𝑘) = (meet‘𝐾))
13		isoml.m	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
14	12, 13	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (meet‘𝑘) = ∧ )
15		eqidd 2761	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → 𝑦 = 𝑦)
16		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (oc‘𝑘) = (oc‘𝐾))
17		isoml.o	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
18	16, 17	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (oc‘𝑘) = ⊥ )
19	18	fveq1d 6890	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))
20	14, 15, 19	oveq123d 7443	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)) = (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))
21	10, 11, 20	oveq123d 7443	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))
22	21	eqeq2d 2771	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥))) ↔ 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))
23	7, 22	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → ((𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)))) ↔ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
24	3, 23	raleqbidv 3334	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
25	3, 24	raleqbidv 3334	. 2 ⊢ (𝑘 = 𝐾 → (∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥)))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
26		df-oml 40343	. 2 ⊢ OML = {𝑘 ∈ OL ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥(le‘𝑘)𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥(join‘𝑘)(𝑦(meet‘𝑘)((oc‘𝑘)‘𝑥))))}
27	25, 26	elrab2 3648	1 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076   class class class wbr 5102  ‘cfv 6541  (class class class)co 7422  Basecbs 17394  lecple 17442  occoc 17443  joincjn 18492  meetcmee 18493  OLcol 40338  OMLcoml 40339

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-iota 6496  df-fv 6549  df-ov 7425  df-oml 40343

This theorem is used by:  isomliN  40403  omlol  40404  omllaw  40407