Theorem omllaw 40058

Description: The orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
omllaw.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
omllaw.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
omllaw.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
omllaw.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
omllaw.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
omllaw	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))

Proof of Theorem omllaw

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		omllaw.b	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		omllaw.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3		omllaw.j	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4		omllaw.m	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
5		omllaw.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isoml 40053	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
7	6	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))
8		breq1 5117	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦))
9		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)
10		fveq2 6888	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑥) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))
11	10	oveq2d 7439	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)) = (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
12	9, 11	oveq12d 7441	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
13	12	eqeq2d 2777	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) ↔ 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
14	8, 13	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))) ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
15		breq2 5118	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌))
16		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → 𝑦 = 𝑌)
17		oveq1 7430	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
18	17	oveq2d 7439	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
19	16, 18	eqeq12d 2782	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) ↔ 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
20	15, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))) ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
21	14, 20	rspc2v 3595	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
22	7, 21	syl5com 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
23	22	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3082   class class class wbr 5114  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7423  Basecbs 17294  lecple 17342  occoc 17343  joincjn 18392  meetcmee 18393  OLcol 39989  OMLcoml 39990

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-ral 3083  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-br 5115  df-iota 6499  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7426  df-oml 39994

This theorem is used by:  omllaw2N  40059  omllaw3  40060  omllaw4  40061