Theorem omllaw 40394

Description: The orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
omllaw.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
omllaw.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
omllaw.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
omllaw.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
omllaw.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
omllaw	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))

Proof of Theorem omllaw

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		omllaw.b	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		omllaw.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3		omllaw.j	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4		omllaw.m	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
5		omllaw.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isoml 40389	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
7	6	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))
8		breq1 5105	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦))
9		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)
10		fveq2 6886	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑥) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))
11	10	oveq2d 7437	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)) = (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
12	9, 11	oveq12d 7439	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
13	12	eqeq2d 2771	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) ↔ 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
14	8, 13	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))) ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
15		breq2 5106	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌))
16		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → 𝑦 = 𝑌)
17		oveq1 7428	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
18	17	oveq2d 7437	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
19	16, 18	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) ↔ 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
20	15, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))) ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
21	14, 20	rspc2v 3586	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
22	7, 21	syl5com 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
23	22	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  ∀wral 3076   class class class wbr 5102  ‘cfv 6539  (class class class)co 7421  Basecbs 17393  lecple 17441  occoc 17442  joincjn 18491  meetcmee 18492  OLcol 40325  OMLcoml 40326

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6547  df-ov 7424  df-oml 40330

This theorem is used by:  omllaw2N  40395  omllaw3  40396  omllaw4  40397