Theorem omllaw 40280

Description: The orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
omllaw.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
omllaw.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
omllaw.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
omllaw.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
omllaw.o	⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
omllaw	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))

Proof of Theorem omllaw

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		omllaw.b	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
2		omllaw.l	. . . . 5 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
3		omllaw.j	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4		omllaw.m	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
5		omllaw.o	. . . . 5 ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)
6	1, 2, 3, 4, 5	isoml 40275	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML ↔ (𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))))))
7	6	simprbi 503	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))))
8		breq1 5106	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦))
9		id 23	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)
10		fveq2 6883	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ( ⊥ ‘𝑥) = ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))
11	10	oveq2d 7434	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)) = (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
12	9, 11	oveq12d 7436	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
13	12	eqeq2d 2772	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥))) ↔ 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
14	8, 13	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))) ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
15		breq2 5107	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌))
16		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → 𝑦 = 𝑌)
17		oveq1 7425	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
18	17	oveq2d 7434	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))
19	16, 18	eqeq12d 2777	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → (𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))) ↔ 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))
20	15, 19	imbi12d 347	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑌 → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))) ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
21	14, 20	rspc2v 3587	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑦 = (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑥)))) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
22	7, 21	syl5com 32	. 2 ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ OML → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋))))))
23	22	3impib 1134	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑌 = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077   class class class wbr 5103  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7418  Basecbs 17380  lecple 17428  occoc 17429  joincjn 18478  meetcmee 18479  OLcol 40211  OMLcoml 40212

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-iota 6493  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7421  df-oml 40216

This theorem is used by:  omllaw2N  40281  omllaw3  40282  omllaw4  40283