Theorem itg2lr 25687

Description: Sufficient condition for elementhood in the set 𝐿. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jun-2014.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
itg2val.1	⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 = (∫1‘𝑔))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
itg2lr	⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹) → (∫1‘𝐺) ∈ 𝐿)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑔,𝐹   𝑔,𝐺,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐿(𝑥,𝑔)

Proof of Theorem itg2lr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2736	. . 3 ⊢ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝐺)
2		breq1 5101	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ↔ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹))
3		fveq2 6834	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (∫1‘𝑔) = (∫1‘𝐺))
4	3	eqeq2d 2747	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝑔) ↔ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝐺)))
5	2, 4	anbi12d 632	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝐺))))
6	5	rspcev 3576	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ (𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝐺))) → ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝑔)))
7	1, 6	mpanr2 704	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹) → ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝑔)))
8		itg2val.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐿 = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 = (∫1‘𝑔))}
9	8	itg2l 25686	. 2 ⊢ ((∫1‘𝐺) ∈ 𝐿 ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ dom ∫1(𝑔 ∘r ≤ 𝐹 ∧ (∫1‘𝐺) = (∫1‘𝑔)))
10	7, 9	sylibr 234	1 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ dom ∫1 ∧ 𝐺 ∘r ≤ 𝐹) → (∫1‘𝐺) ∈ 𝐿)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2113  {cab 2714  ∃wrex 3060   class class class wbr 5098  dom cdm 5624  ‘cfv 6492   ∘_r cofr 7621   ≤ cle 11167  ∫₁citg1 25572

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2708  ax-nul 5251

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3400  df-v 3442  df-dif 3904  df-un 3906  df-ss 3918  df-nul 4286  df-if 4480  df-sn 4581  df-pr 4583  df-op 4587  df-uni 4864  df-br 5099  df-iota 6448  df-fv 6500

This theorem is referenced by:  itg2ub  25690