Theorem ralimdaa 3264

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	1, 2	ralrimia 3262	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
4		ralim 3103	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
5	3, 4	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-12 2213

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-ral 3078

This theorem is used by:  ralbida  3274  eltsk2g  10836  ptcnplem  23940  poimirlem26  38564  allbutfifvre  46684  climleltrp  46685  fnlimabslt  46688  limsupub2  46821  liminflbuz2  46824  xlimmnfvlem1  46841  xlimmnfvlem2  46842  xlimpnfvlem1  46845  xlimpnfvlem2  46846  stoweidlem61  47070  stoweid  47072  fourierdlem73  47188  smflimlem2  47781