Theorem ralimdaa 3268

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	1, 2	ralrimia 3266	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
4		ralim 3107	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
5	3, 4	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-12 2216

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-ral 3082

This theorem is used by:  ralbida  3278  eltsk2g  10751  ptcnplem  23829  poimirlem26  38354  allbutfifvre  46447  climleltrp  46448  fnlimabslt  46451  limsupub2  46584  liminflbuz2  46587  xlimmnfvlem1  46604  xlimmnfvlem2  46605  xlimpnfvlem1  46608  xlimpnfvlem2  46609  stoweidlem61  46833  stoweid  46835  fourierdlem73  46951  smflimlem2  47544