Theorem ralimdaa 3238

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3235	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
5		ralim 3069	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
6	4, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-ral 3045

This theorem is referenced by:  ralbida  3248  eltsk2g  10704  ptcnplem  23508  poimirlem26  37640  allbutfifvre  45673  climleltrp  45674  fnlimabslt  45677  limsupub2  45810  liminflbuz2  45813  xlimmnfvlem1  45830  xlimmnfvlem2  45831  xlimpnfvlem1  45834  xlimpnfvlem2  45835  stoweidlem61  46059  stoweid  46061  fourierdlem73  46177  smflimlem2  46770