Theorem ralimdaa 3230

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3227	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
5		ralim 3069	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
6	4, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1783   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-ral 3045

This theorem is referenced by:  ralbida  3240  eltsk2g  10645  ptcnplem  23506  poimirlem26  37626  allbutfifvre  45656  climleltrp  45657  fnlimabslt  45660  limsupub2  45793  liminflbuz2  45796  xlimmnfvlem1  45813  xlimmnfvlem2  45814  xlimpnfvlem1  45817  xlimpnfvlem2  45818  stoweidlem61  46042  stoweid  46044  fourierdlem73  46160  smflimlem2  46753