Theorem ralimdaa 3263

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	1, 2	ralrimia 3261	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
4		ralim 3102	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
5	3, 4	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399  Ⅎwnf 1803   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3076

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-12 2212

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-ral 3077

This theorem is referenced by:  ralbida  3273  eltsk2g  10709  ptcnplem  23681  poimirlem26  38145  allbutfifvre  46249  climleltrp  46250  fnlimabslt  46253  limsupub2  46386  liminflbuz2  46389  xlimmnfvlem1  46406  xlimmnfvlem2  46407  xlimpnfvlem1  46410  xlimpnfvlem2  46411  stoweidlem61  46635  stoweid  46637  fourierdlem73  46753  smflimlem2  47346