Theorem ralimdaa 3234

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	2	ex 412	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)))
4	1, 3	ralrimi 3231	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
5		ralim 3073	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
6	4, 5	syl 17	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  Ⅎwnf 1784   ∈ wcel 2113  ∀wral 3048

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-12 2182

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-ral 3049

This theorem is referenced by:  ralbida  3244  eltsk2g  10653  ptcnplem  23556  poimirlem26  37759  allbutfifvre  45835  climleltrp  45836  fnlimabslt  45839  limsupub2  45972  liminflbuz2  45975  xlimmnfvlem1  45992  xlimmnfvlem2  45993  xlimpnfvlem1  45996  xlimpnfvlem2  45997  stoweidlem61  46221  stoweid  46223  fourierdlem73  46339  smflimlem2  46932