Theorem ralimdaa 3267

Description: Deduction quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.20 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
ralimdaa.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ralimdaa	⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

Proof of Theorem ralimdaa

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ralimdaa.1	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
2		ralimdaa.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3	1, 2	ralrimia 3265	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))
4		ralim 3106	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
5	3, 4	syl 18	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  Ⅎwnf 1816   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-12 2216

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-ral 3081

This theorem is used by:  ralbida  3277  eltsk2g  10875  ptcnplem  23995  omssubadd  35043  srepdflem2  36127  poimirlem26  38832  allbutfifvre  46958  climleltrp  46959  fnlimabslt  46962  limsupub2  47095  liminflbuz2  47098  xlimmnfvlem1  47115  xlimmnfvlem2  47116  xlimpnfvlem1  47119  xlimpnfvlem2  47120  stoweidlem61  47344  stoweid  47346  fourierdlem73  47462  smflimlem2  48055