Theorem sbccomieg 42788

Description: Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sbccomieg.1	⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbccomieg	⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏   𝐶,𝑎

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐵(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐶(𝑏)

Proof of Theorem sbccomieg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcex 3766	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		spesbc 3848	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → ∃𝑏[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
3		sbcex 3766	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4	3	exlimiv 1930	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑏[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
5	2, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6		nfcv 2892	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎𝐶
7		nfsbc1v 3776	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑
8	6, 7	nfsbcw 3778	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎[𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑
9		sbccomieg.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
10		sbceq1a 3767	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
11	9, 10	sbceqbid 3763	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ([𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
12	8, 11	sbciegf 3795	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
13	1, 5, 12	pm5.21nii 378	1 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1540  ∃wex 1779   ∈ wcel 2109  Vcvv 3450  [wsbc 3756

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757

This theorem is referenced by:  2rexfrabdioph  42791  3rexfrabdioph  42792  4rexfrabdioph  42793  6rexfrabdioph  42794  7rexfrabdioph  42795