Theorem sbccomieg 39734

Description: Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
sbccomieg.1	⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbccomieg	⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)

Distinct variable groups:   𝐴,𝑎,𝑏   𝐶,𝑎

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐵(𝑎,𝑏)   𝐶(𝑏)

Proof of Theorem sbccomieg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbcex 3730	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
2		spesbc 3811	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → ∃𝑏[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)
3		sbcex 3730	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
4	3	exlimiv 1931	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑏[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
5	2, 4	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ ([𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
6		nfcv 2955	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎𝐶
7		nfsbc1v 3740	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎[𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑
8	6, 7	nfsbcw 3742	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑎[𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑
9		sbccomieg.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
10		sbceq1a 3731	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
11	9, 10	sbceqbid 3727	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ([𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
12	8, 11	sbciegf 3757	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑))
13	1, 5, 12	pm5.21nii 383	1 ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1538  ∃wex 1781   ∈ wcel 2111  Vcvv 3441  [wsbc 3720

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-rex 3112  df-v 3443  df-sbc 3721

This theorem is referenced by:  2rexfrabdioph  39737  3rexfrabdioph  39738  4rexfrabdioph  39739  6rexfrabdioph  39740  7rexfrabdioph  39741