Theorem trlsegvdeglem4 30170

Description: Lemma for trlsegvdeg 30174. (Contributed by AV, 21-Feb-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
trlsegvdeg.v	⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)
trlsegvdeg.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)
trlsegvdeg.f	⊢ (𝜑 → Fun 𝐼)
trlsegvdeg.n	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹)))
trlsegvdeg.u	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)
trlsegvdeg.w	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹(Trails‘𝐺)𝑃)
trlsegvdeg.vx	⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑋) = 𝑉)
trlsegvdeg.vy	⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑌) = 𝑉)
trlsegvdeg.vz	⊢ (𝜑 → (Vtx‘𝑍) = 𝑉)
trlsegvdeg.ix	⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))
trlsegvdeg.iy	⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑌) = {⟨(𝐹‘𝑁), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑁))⟩})
trlsegvdeg.iz	⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑍) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0...𝑁))))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
trlsegvdeglem4	⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)) ∩ dom 𝐼))

Proof of Theorem trlsegvdeglem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		trlsegvdeg.ix	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝑋) = (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))
2	1	dmeqd 5896	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) = dom (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))))
3		dmres 6010	. 2 ⊢ dom (𝐼 ↾ (𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁))) = ((𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)) ∩ dom 𝐼)
4	2, 3	eqtrdi 2785	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom (iEdg‘𝑋) = ((𝐹 “ (0..^𝑁)) ∩ dom 𝐼))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2107   ∩ cin 3930  {csn 4606  ⟨cop 4612   class class class wbr 5123  dom cdm 5665   ↾ cres 5667   “ cima 5668  Fun wfun 6535  ‘cfv 6541  (class class class)co 7413  0cc0 11137  ...cfz 13529  ..^cfzo 13676  ♯chash 14351  Vtxcvtx 28941  iEdgciedg 28942  Trailsctrls 29636

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5276  ax-nul 5286  ax-pr 5412

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1779  df-sb 2064  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2808  df-ral 3051  df-rex 3060  df-rab 3420  df-v 3465  df-dif 3934  df-un 3936  df-in 3938  df-ss 3948  df-nul 4314  df-if 4506  df-sn 4607  df-pr 4609  df-op 4613  df-br 5124  df-opab 5186  df-xp 5671  df-dm 5675  df-res 5677

This theorem is referenced by:  trlsegvdeglem6  30172  trlsegvdeg  30174