Theorem vk15.4j 45220

Description: Excercise 4j of Unit 15 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. This proof is the minimized Hilbert-style axiomatic version of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof found on page 442 of Klenk and was automatically derived from that proof. vk15.4j 45220 is vk15.4jVD 45605 automatically translated and minimized. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vk15.4j.1	⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
vk15.4j.2	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
vk15.4j.3	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vk15.4j	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

Proof of Theorem vk15.4j

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vk15.4j.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
2		exanali 1889	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	mpbir 234	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
4		vk15.4j.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
5		alex 1856	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜃 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
6	5	biimpri 231	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥𝜃)
7	6	19.21bi 2225	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → 𝜃)
8		simpl 487	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜏)
9	8	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜏))
10		19.8a 2217	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
11	7, 9, 10	syl6an 696	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))
12		notnot 143	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
13	11, 12	syl6 36	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))
14		con3 154	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → (¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒))
15	4, 13, 14	mpsylsyld 70	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒))
16		hbe1 2178	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
17	16	hbn 2330	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
18		hbn1 2177	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒)
19	3, 15, 17, 18	eexinst01 45218	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒)
20		exnal 1857	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜒 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒)
21	19, 20	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜒)
22		vk15.4j.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
23		pm3.13 1010	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)))
24	22, 23	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
25		simpr 489	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜑)
26	25	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜑))
27		19.8a 2217	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
28	26, 27	syl6 36	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
29		hbe1 2178	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
30	3, 28, 17, 29	eexinst01 45218	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
31		notnot 143	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
32	30, 31	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
33		pm2.53 864	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → (¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)))
34	24, 32, 33	mpsyl 69	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
35		exanali 1889	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
36	35	con5i 45215	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
37	34, 36	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
38	37	19.21bi 2225	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
39	38	con3d 153	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓))
40		19.8a 2217	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
41	39, 40	syl6 36	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓))
42		hbe1 2178	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
43	21, 41, 17, 42	eexinst11 45219	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
44		exnal 1857	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
45	43, 44	sylib 221	1 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1809

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-10 2176  ax-12 2213

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814

This theorem is referenced by: (None)