Theorem vk15.4j 45604

Description: Excercise 4j of Unit 15 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. This proof is the minimized Hilbert-style axiomatic version of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof found on page 442 of Klenk and was automatically derived from that proof. vk15.4j 45604 is vk15.4jVD 45989 automatically translated and minimized. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
vk15.4j.1	⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
vk15.4j.2	⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
vk15.4j.3	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
vk15.4j	⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

Proof of Theorem vk15.4j

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		vk15.4j.3	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑)
2		exanali 1891	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜏 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	mpbir 234	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃𝑥(𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)
4		vk15.4j.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
5		alex 1858	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜃 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
6	5	biimpri 231	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥𝜃)
7	6	19.21bi 2225	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → 𝜃)
8		simpl 488	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜏)
9	8	a1i 11	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → 𝜏))
10		19.8a 2217	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
11	7, 9, 10	syl6an 697	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))
12		notnot 143	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏))
13	11, 12	syl6 36	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)))
14		con3 154	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑥𝜒 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) → (¬ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜃 ∧ 𝜏) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒))
15	4, 13, 14	mpsylsyld 70	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒))
16		hbe1 2179	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
17	16	hbn 2328	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃)
18		hbn1 2178	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥𝜒 → ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒)
19	3, 15, 17, 18	eexinst01 45602	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒)
20		exnal 1859	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜒 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜒)
21	19, 20	sylibr 237	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜒)
22		vk15.4j.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
23		pm3.13 1010	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)))
24	22, 23	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
25		simpr 490	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜑)
26	25	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜑))
27		19.8a 2217	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
28	26, 27	syl6 36	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ((𝜏 ∧ ¬ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑))
29		hbe1 2179	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
30	3, 28, 17, 29	eexinst01 45602	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
31		notnot 143	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
32	30, 31	syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑)
33		pm2.53 865	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)) → (¬ ¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒)))
34	24, 32, 33	mpsyl 69	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
35		exanali 1891	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
36	35	con5i 45599	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
37	34, 36	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 → 𝜒))
38	37	19.21bi 2225	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
39	38	con3d 153	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓))
40		19.8a 2217	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝜓 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
41	39, 40	syl6 36	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → (¬ 𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓))
42		hbe1 2179	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 → ∀𝑥∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
43	21, 41, 17, 42	eexinst11 45603	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓)
44		exnal 1859	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜓 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)
45	43, 44	sylib 221	1 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑥 ¬ 𝜃 → ¬ ∀𝑥𝜓)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861  ∀wal 1567  ∃wex 1811

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-10 2177  ax-12 2212

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816

This theorem is used by: (None)