| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > wkslem2 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Lemma 2 for walks to substitute the index of the condition for vertices and edges in a walk. (Contributed by AV, 23-Apr-2021.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| wkslem2 | ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → (if-((𝑃‘𝐴) = (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) = {(𝑃‘𝐴)}, {(𝑃‘𝐴), (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴))) ↔ if-((𝑃‘𝐵) = (𝑃‘𝐶), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵)) = {(𝑃‘𝐵)}, {(𝑃‘𝐵), (𝑃‘𝐶)} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵))))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | fveq2 6858 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑃‘𝐴) = (𝑃‘𝐵)) | |
| 2 | 1 | adantr 480 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → (𝑃‘𝐴) = (𝑃‘𝐵)) |
| 3 | fveq2 6858 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶 → (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1)) = (𝑃‘𝐶)) | |
| 4 | 3 | adantl 481 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1)) = (𝑃‘𝐶)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | eqeq12d 2745 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → ((𝑃‘𝐴) = (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1)) ↔ (𝑃‘𝐵) = (𝑃‘𝐶))) |
| 6 | 2fveq3 6863 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) = (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵))) | |
| 7 | 1 | sneqd 4601 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → {(𝑃‘𝐴)} = {(𝑃‘𝐵)}) |
| 8 | 6, 7 | eqeq12d 2745 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) = {(𝑃‘𝐴)} ↔ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵)) = {(𝑃‘𝐵)})) |
| 9 | 8 | adantr 480 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → ((𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) = {(𝑃‘𝐴)} ↔ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵)) = {(𝑃‘𝐵)})) |
| 10 | 2, 4 | preq12d 4705 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → {(𝑃‘𝐴), (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1))} = {(𝑃‘𝐵), (𝑃‘𝐶)}) |
| 11 | 6 | adantr 480 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) = (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵))) |
| 12 | 10, 11 | sseq12d 3980 | . 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → ({(𝑃‘𝐴), (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) ↔ {(𝑃‘𝐵), (𝑃‘𝐶)} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵)))) |
| 13 | 5, 9, 12 | ifpbi123d 1078 | 1 ⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 + 1) = 𝐶) → (if-((𝑃‘𝐴) = (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1)), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴)) = {(𝑃‘𝐴)}, {(𝑃‘𝐴), (𝑃‘(𝐴 + 1))} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐴))) ↔ if-((𝑃‘𝐵) = (𝑃‘𝐶), (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵)) = {(𝑃‘𝐵)}, {(𝑃‘𝐵), (𝑃‘𝐶)} ⊆ (𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝐵))))) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 ∧ wa 395 if-wif 1062 = wceq 1540 ⊆ wss 3914 {csn 4589 {cpr 4591 ‘cfv 6511 (class class class)co 7387 1c1 11069 + caddc 11071 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1795 ax-4 1809 ax-5 1910 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2008 ax-8 2111 ax-9 2119 ax-ext 2701 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 848 df-ifp 1063 df-3an 1088 df-tru 1543 df-fal 1553 df-ex 1780 df-sb 2066 df-clab 2708 df-cleq 2721 df-clel 2803 df-rab 3406 df-v 3449 df-dif 3917 df-un 3919 df-ss 3931 df-nul 4297 df-if 4489 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4872 df-br 5108 df-iota 6464 df-fv 6519 |
| This theorem is referenced by: wlkl1loop 29566 wlk1walk 29567 crctcshwlkn0lem6 29745 1wlkdlem4 30069 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |