Theorem abnexg 4367

Description: Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. The class F can be thought of as an expression in x and the abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values F as x varies through A. Assuming the antecedents, if that class is a set, then so is the "domain" A. The converse holds without antecedent, see abrexexg 6016. Note that the second antecedent A. x e. A x e. F cannot be translated to A C_ F since F may depend on x. In applications, one may take F = { x } or F = ~P x (see snnex 4369 and pwnex 4370 respectively, proved from abnex 4368, which is a consequence of abnexg 4367 with A = _V). (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abnexg	|- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> ( { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. W -> A e. _V ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, A, y   y, F

Allowed substitution hints:   F( x)   V( x, y)   W( x, y)

Proof of Theorem abnexg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uniexg 4361	. 2 |- ( { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. W -> U. { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. _V )
2		simpl 108	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> F e. V )
3	2	ralimi 2495	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> A. x e. A F e. V )
4		dfiun2g 3845	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x e. A F e. V -> U_ x e. A F = U. { y | E. x e. A y = F } )
5	4	eleq1d 2208	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x e. A F e. V -> ( U_ x e. A F e. _V <-> U. { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. _V ) )
6	5	biimprd 157	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. A F e. V -> ( U. { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. _V -> U_ x e. A F e. _V ) )
7	3, 6	syl 14	. . 3 |- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> ( U. { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. _V -> U_ x e. A F e. _V ) )
8		simpr 109	. . . . 5 |- ( ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> x e. F )
9	8	ralimi 2495	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> A. x e. A x e. F )
10		iunid 3868	. . . . 5 |- U_ x e. A { x } = A
11		snssi 3664	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x e. F -> { x } C_ F )
12	11	ralimi 2495	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x e. A x e. F -> A. x e. A { x } C_ F )
13		ss2iun 3828	. . . . . 6 |- ( A. x e. A { x } C_ F -> U_ x e. A { x } C_ U_ x e. A F )
14	12, 13	syl 14	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x e. A x e. F -> U_ x e. A { x } C_ U_ x e. A F )
15	10, 14	eqsstrrid 3144	. . . 4 |- ( A. x e. A x e. F -> A C_ U_ x e. A F )
16		ssexg 4067	. . . . 5 |- ( ( A C_ U_ x e. A F /\ U_ x e. A F e. _V ) -> A e. _V )
17	16	ex 114	. . . 4 |- ( A C_ U_ x e. A F -> ( U_ x e. A F e. _V -> A e. _V ) )
18	9, 15, 17	3syl 17	. . 3 |- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> ( U_ x e. A F e. _V -> A e. _V ) )
19	7, 18	syld 45	. 2 |- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> ( U. { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. _V -> A e. _V ) )
20	1, 19	syl5 32	1 |- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> ( { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. W -> A e. _V ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   = wceq 1331   e. wcel 1480   {cab 2125   A.wral 2416   E.wrex 2417   _Vcvv 2686   C_ wss 3071   {csn 3527   U.cuni 3736   U_ciun 3813

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-un 4355

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-v 2688  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-sn 3533  df-uni 3737  df-iun 3815

This theorem is referenced by:  abnex  4368