P. 45 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4401-4500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Definition	df-ilim 4401	Define the limit ordinal predicate, which is true for an ordinal that has the empty set as an element and is not a successor (i.e. that is the union of itself). Our definition combines the definition of Lim of [BellMachover] p. 471 and Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, and then changes A =/= (/) to (/) e. A (which would be equivalent given the law of the excluded middle, but which is not for us). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2018.) Use its alias dflim2 4402 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Theorem	dflim2 4402	Alias for df-ilim 4401. Use it instead of df-ilim 4401 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Definition	df-suc 4403	Define the successor of a class. When applied to an ordinal number, the successor means the same thing as "plus 1". Definition 7.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41, who use "+ 1" to denote this function. Our definition is a generalization to classes. Although it is not conventional to use it with proper classes, it has no effect on a proper class (sucprc 4444). Some authors denote the successor operation with a prime (apostrophe-like) symbol, such as Definition 6 of [Suppes] p. 134 and the definition of successor in [Mendelson] p. 246 (who uses the symbol "Suc" as a predicate to mean "is a successor ordinal"). The definition of successor of [Enderton] p. 68 denotes the operation with a plus-sign superscript. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- suc A = ( A u. { A } )
Theorem	ordeq 4404	Equality theorem for the ordinal predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Ord A <-> Ord B ) )
Theorem	elong 4405	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. On <-> Ord A ) )
Theorem	elon 4406	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. On <-> Ord A )
Theorem	eloni 4407	An ordinal number has the ordinal property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. On -> Ord A )
Theorem	elon2 4408	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A e. On <-> ( Ord A /\ A e. _V ) )
Theorem	limeq 4409	Equality theorem for the limit predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Lim A <-> Lim B ) )
Theorem	ordtr 4410	An ordinal class is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> Tr A )
Theorem	ordelss 4411	An element of an ordinal class is a subset of it. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B C_ A )
Theorem	trssord 4412	A transitive subclass of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ A C_ B /\ Ord B ) -> Ord A )
Theorem	ordelord 4413	An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> Ord B )
Theorem	tron 4414	The class of all ordinal numbers is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2009.)
|- Tr On
Theorem	ordelon 4415	An element of an ordinal class is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	onelon 4416	An element of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Theorem 2.2(iii) of [BellMachover] p. 469. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	ordin 4417	The intersection of two ordinal classes is ordinal. Proposition 7.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ Ord B ) -> Ord ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	onin 4418	The intersection of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. On ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. On )
Theorem	onelss 4419	An element of an ordinal number is a subset of the number. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	ordtr1 4420	Transitive law for ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
|- ( Ord C -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	ontr1 4421	Transitive law for ordinal numbers. Theorem 7M(b) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|- ( C e. On -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	onintss 4422*	If a property is true for an ordinal number, then the minimum ordinal number for which it is true is smaller or equal. Theorem Schema 61 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. On -> ( ps -> |^| { x e. On | ph } C_ A ) )
Theorem	ord0 4423	The empty set is an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1994.)
|- Ord (/)
Theorem	0elon 4424	The empty set is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(b) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- (/) e. On
Theorem	inton 4425	The intersection of the class of ordinal numbers is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2003.)
|- |^| On = (/)
Theorem	nlim0 4426	The empty set is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- -. Lim (/)
Theorem	limord 4427	A limit ordinal is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> Ord A )
Theorem	limuni 4428	A limit ordinal is its own supremum (union). (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> A = U. A )
Theorem	limuni2 4429	The union of a limit ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.)
|- ( Lim A -> Lim U. A )
Theorem	0ellim 4430	A limit ordinal contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
|- ( Lim A -> (/) e. A )
Theorem	limelon 4431	A limit ordinal class that is also a set is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ Lim A ) -> A e. On )
Theorem	onn0 4432	The class of all ordinal numbers is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.)
|- On =/= (/)
Theorem	onm 4433	The class of all ordinal numbers is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2019.)
|- E. x x e. On
Theorem	suceq 4434	Equality of successors. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> suc A = suc B )
Theorem	elsuci 4435	Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either A or B be sets. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. suc B -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsucg 4436	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc2g 4437	Variant of membership in a successor, requiring that B rather than A be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc 4438	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsuc2 4439	Membership in a successor. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( B e. suc A <-> ( B e. A \/ B = A ) )
Theorem	nfsuc 4440	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for successor. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-2003.)
|- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x suc A
Theorem	elelsuc 4441	Membership in a successor. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-1998.)
|- ( A e. B -> A e. suc B )
Theorem	sucel 4442*	Membership of a successor in another class. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.)
|- ( suc A e. B <-> E. x e. B A. y ( y e. x <-> ( y e. A \/ y = A ) ) )
Theorem	suc0 4443	The successor of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2005.)
|- suc (/) = { (/) }
Theorem	sucprc 4444	A proper class is its own successor. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.)
|- ( -. A e. _V -> suc A = A )
Theorem	unisuc 4445	A transitive class is equal to the union of its successor. Combines Theorem 4E of [Enderton] p. 72 and Exercise 6 of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( Tr A <-> U. suc A = A )
Theorem	unisucg 4446	A transitive class is equal to the union of its successor. Combines Theorem 4E of [Enderton] p. 72 and Exercise 6 of [Enderton] p. 73. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Aug-2019.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( Tr A <-> U. suc A = A ) )
Theorem	sssucid 4447	A class is included in its own successor. Part of Proposition 7.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41 (generalized to arbitrary classes). (Contributed by NM, 31-May-1994.)
|- A C_ suc A
Theorem	sucidg 4448	Part of Proposition 7.23 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41 (generalized). (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2012.)
|- ( A e. V -> A e. suc A )
Theorem	sucid 4449	A set belongs to its successor. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Alan Sare, 18-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Scott Fenton, 20-Feb-2012.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- A e. suc A
Theorem	nsuceq0g 4450	No successor is empty. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Oct-2018.)
|- ( A e. V -> suc A =/= (/) )
Theorem	eqelsuc 4451	A set belongs to the successor of an equal set. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A = B -> A e. suc B )
Theorem	iunsuc 4452*	Inductive definition for the indexed union at a successor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Feb-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- ( x = A -> B = C )   =>    |- U_ x e. suc A B = ( U_ x e. A B u. C )
Theorem	suctr 4453	The successor of a transitive class is transitive. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 11-Apr-2009.)
|- ( Tr A -> Tr suc A )
Theorem	trsuc 4454	A set whose successor belongs to a transitive class also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ suc B e. A ) -> B e. A )
Theorem	trsucss 4455	A member of the successor of a transitive class is a subclass of it. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2003.)
|- ( Tr A -> ( B e. suc A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	sucssel 4456	A set whose successor is a subset of another class is a member of that class. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( suc A C_ B -> A e. B ) )
Theorem	orduniss 4457	An ordinal class includes its union. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2003.)
|- ( Ord A -> U. A C_ A )
Theorem	onordi 4458	An ordinal number is an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- Ord A
Theorem	ontrci 4459	An ordinal number is a transitive class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- Tr A
Theorem	oneli 4460	A member of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Theorem 7M(a) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- ( B e. A -> B e. On )
Theorem	onelssi 4461	A member of an ordinal number is a subset of it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- ( B e. A -> B C_ A )
Theorem	onelini 4462	An element of an ordinal number equals the intersection with it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- ( B e. A -> B = ( B i^i A ) )
Theorem	oneluni 4463	An ordinal number equals its union with any element. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- ( B e. A -> ( A u. B ) = A )
Theorem	onunisuci 4464	An ordinal number is equal to the union of its successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. On   =>    |- U. suc A = A
2.4  IZF Set Theory - add the Axiom of Union
2.4.1  Introduce the Axiom of Union
Axiom	ax-un 4465*	Axiom of Union. An axiom of Intuitionistic Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory. It states that a set y exists that includes the union of a given set x i.e. the collection of all members of the members of x. The variant axun2 4467 states that the union itself exists. A version with the standard abbreviation for union is uniex2 4468. A version using class notation is uniex 4469. This is Axiom 3 of [Crosilla] p. "Axioms of CZF and IZF", except (a) unnecessary quantifiers are removed, (b) Crosilla has a biconditional rather than an implication (but the two are equivalent by bm1.3ii 4151), and (c) the order of the conjuncts is swapped (which is equivalent by ancom 266). The union of a class df-uni 3837 should not be confused with the union of two classes df-un 3158. Their relationship is shown in unipr 3850. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-1993.)
|- E. y A. z ( E. w ( z e. w /\ w e. x ) -> z e. y )
Theorem	zfun 4466*	Axiom of Union expressed with the fewest number of different variables. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2003.)
|- E. x A. y ( E. x ( y e. x /\ x e. z ) -> y e. x )
Theorem	axun2 4467*	A variant of the Axiom of Union ax-un 4465. For any set x, there exists a set y whose members are exactly the members of the members of x i.e. the union of x. Axiom Union of [BellMachover] p. 466. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
|- E. y A. z ( z e. y <-> E. w ( z e. w /\ w e. x ) )
Theorem	uniex2 4468*	The Axiom of Union using the standard abbreviation for union. Given any set x, its union y exists. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2006.)
|- E. y y = U. x
Theorem	uniex 4469	The Axiom of Union in class notation. This says that if A is a set i.e. A e. _V (see isset 2766), then the union of A is also a set. Same as Axiom 3 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1993.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- U. A e. _V
Theorem	vuniex 4470	The union of a setvar is a set. (Contributed by BJ, 3-May-2021.)
|- U. x e. _V
Theorem	uniexg 4471	The ZF Axiom of Union in class notation, in the form of a theorem instead of an inference. We use the antecedent A e. V instead of A e. _V to make the theorem more general and thus shorten some proofs; obviously the universal class constant _V is one possible substitution for class variable V. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-1994.)
|- ( A e. V -> U. A e. _V )
Theorem	uniexd 4472	Deduction version of the ZF Axiom of Union in class notation. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 26-Jun-2021.)
|- ( ph -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ph -> U. A e. _V )
Theorem	unex 4473	The union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-1994.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( A u. B ) e. _V
Theorem	unexb 4474	Existence of union is equivalent to existence of its components. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.)
|- ( ( A e. _V /\ B e. _V ) <-> ( A u. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	unexg 4475	A union of two sets is a set. Corollary 5.8 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2006.)
|- ( ( A e. V /\ B e. W ) -> ( A u. B ) e. _V )
Theorem	tpexg 4476	An unordered triple of classes exists. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( A e. U /\ B e. V /\ C e. W ) -> { A , B , C } e. _V )
Theorem	unisn3 4477*	Union of a singleton in the form of a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2008.)
|- ( A e. B -> U. { x e. B | x = A } = A )
Theorem	abnexg 4478*	Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. The class F can be thought of as an expression in x and the abstraction appearing in the statement as the class of values F as x varies through A. Assuming the antecedents, if that class is a set, then so is the "domain" A. The converse holds without antecedent, see abrexexg 6172. Note that the second antecedent A. x e. A x e. F cannot be translated to A C_ F since F may depend on x. In applications, one may take F = { x } or F = ~P x (see snnex 4480 and pwnex 4481 respectively, proved from abnex 4479, which is a consequence of abnexg 4478 with A = _V). (Contributed by BJ, 2-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> ( { y | E. x e. A y = F } e. W -> A e. _V ) )
Theorem	abnex 4479*	Sufficient condition for a class abstraction to be a proper class. Lemma for snnex 4480 and pwnex 4481. See the comment of abnexg 4478. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)
|- ( A. x ( F e. V /\ x e. F ) -> -. { y | E. x y = F } e. _V )
Theorem	snnex 4480*	The class of all singletons is a proper class. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2008.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 7-Dec-2008.)
|- { x | E. y x = { y } } e/ _V
Theorem	pwnex 4481*	The class of all power sets is a proper class. See also snnex 4480. (Contributed by BJ, 2-May-2021.)
|- { x | E. y x = ~P y } e/ _V
Theorem	opeluu 4482	Each member of an ordered pair belongs to the union of the union of a class to which the ordered pair belongs. Lemma 3D of [Enderton] p. 41. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Feb-2016.)
|- A e. _V   &    |- B e. _V   =>    |- ( <. A , B >. e. C -> ( A e. U. U. C /\ B e. U. U. C ) )
Theorem	uniuni 4483*	Expression for double union that moves union into a class builder. (Contributed by FL, 28-May-2007.)
|- U. U. A = U. { x | E. y ( x = U. y /\ y e. A ) }
Theorem	eusv1 4484*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression A ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2010.)
|- ( E! y A. x y = A <-> E. y A. x y = A )
Theorem	eusvnf 4485*	Even if x is free in A, it is effectively bound when A ( x ) is single-valued. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( E! y A. x y = A -> F/_ x A )
Theorem	eusvnfb 4486*	Two ways to say that A ( x ) is a set expression that does not depend on x. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! y A. x y = A <-> ( F/_ x A /\ A e. _V ) )
Theorem	eusv2i 4487*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression A ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E! y A. x y = A -> E! y E. x y = A )
Theorem	eusv2nf 4488*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression A ( x ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( E! y E. x y = A <-> F/_ x A )
Theorem	eusv2 4489*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression A ( x ). (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( E! y E. x y = A <-> E! y A. x y = A )
Theorem	reusv1 4490*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression C ( y ). (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
|- ( E. y e. B ph -> ( E! x e. A A. y e. B ( ph -> x = C ) <-> E. x e. A A. y e. B ( ph -> x = C ) ) )
Theorem	reusv3i 4491*	Two ways of expressing existential uniqueness via an indirect equality. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2012.)
|- ( y = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = z -> C = D )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A A. y e. B ( ph -> x = C ) -> A. y e. B A. z e. B ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> C = D ) )
Theorem	reusv3 4492*	Two ways to express single-valuedness of a class expression C ( y ). See reusv1 4490 for the connection to uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-2012.)
|- ( y = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( y = z -> C = D )   =>    |- ( E. y e. B ( ph /\ C e. A ) -> ( A. y e. B A. z e. B ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> C = D ) <-> E. x e. A A. y e. B ( ph -> x = C ) ) )
Theorem	alxfr 4493*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2007.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ( A. y A e. B /\ A. x E. y x = A ) -> ( A. x ph <-> A. y ps ) )
Theorem	ralxfrd 4494*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
|- ( ( ph /\ y e. C ) -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> E. y e. C x = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps <-> A. y e. C ch ) )
Theorem	rexxfrd 4495*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by FL, 10-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ y e. C ) -> A e. B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. B ) -> E. y e. C x = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. B ps <-> E. y e. C ch ) )
Theorem	ralxfr2d 4496*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ y e. C ) -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. B <-> E. y e. C x = A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. B ps <-> A. y e. C ch ) )
Theorem	rexxfr2d 4497*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Aug-2014.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
|- ( ( ph /\ y e. C ) -> A e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x e. B <-> E. y e. C x = A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. B ps <-> E. y e. C ch ) )
Theorem	ralxfr 4498*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
|- ( y e. C -> A e. B )   &    |- ( x e. B -> E. y e. C x = A )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. B ph <-> A. y e. C ps )
Theorem	ralxfrALT 4499*	Transfer universal quantification from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. This proof does not use ralxfrd 4494. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( y e. C -> A e. B )   &    |- ( x e. B -> E. y e. C x = A )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. B ph <-> A. y e. C ps )
Theorem	rexxfr 4500*	Transfer existence from a variable x to another variable y contained in expression A. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Aug-2014.)
|- ( y e. C -> A e. B )   &    |- ( x e. B -> E. y e. C x = A )   &    |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. B ph <-> E. y e. C ps )