P. 45 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 4401-4500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	swopo 4401*	A strict weak order is a partial order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( y e. A /\ z e. A ) ) -> ( y R z -> -. z R y ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. A /\ z e. A ) ) -> ( x R y -> ( x R z \/ z R y ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> R Po A )
Theorem	poirr 4402	A partial order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ( R Po A /\ B e. A ) -> -. B R B )
Theorem	potr 4403	A partial order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ( R Po A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> ( ( B R C /\ C R D ) -> B R D ) )
Theorem	po2nr 4404	A partial order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ( R Po A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) ) -> -. ( B R C /\ C R B ) )
Theorem	po3nr 4405	A partial order relation has no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ( R Po A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> -. ( B R C /\ C R D /\ D R B ) )
Theorem	po0 4406	Any relation is a partial ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- R Po (/)
Theorem	pofun 4407*	A function preserves a partial order relation. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 18-Jun-2011.)
|- S = { <. x , y >. | X R Y }   &    |- ( x = y -> X = Y )   =>    |- ( ( R Po B /\ A. x e. A X e. B ) -> S Po A )
Theorem	sopo 4408	A strict linear order is a strict partial order. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R Or A -> R Po A )
Theorem	soss 4409	Subset theorem for the strict ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( R Or B -> R Or A ) )
Theorem	soeq1 4410	Equality theorem for the strict ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Or A <-> S Or A ) )
Theorem	soeq2 4411	Equality theorem for the strict ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Or A <-> R Or B ) )
Theorem	sonr 4412	A strict order relation is irreflexive. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-1995.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ B e. A ) -> -. B R B )
Theorem	sotr 4413	A strict order relation is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> ( ( B R C /\ C R D ) -> B R D ) )
Theorem	issod 4414*	An irreflexive, transitive, trichotomous relation is a linear ordering (in the sense of df-iso 4392). (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
|- ( ph -> R Po A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. A ) ) -> ( x R y \/ x = y \/ y R x ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> R Or A )
Theorem	sowlin 4415	A strict order relation satisfies weak linearity. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Oct-2018.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> ( B R C -> ( B R D \/ D R C ) ) )
Theorem	so2nr 4416	A strict order relation has no 2-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) ) -> -. ( B R C /\ C R B ) )
Theorem	so3nr 4417	A strict order relation has no 3-cycle loops. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A /\ D e. A ) ) -> -. ( B R C /\ C R D /\ D R B ) )
Theorem	sotricim 4418	One direction of sotritric 4419 holds for all weakly linear orders. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2019.)
|- ( ( R Or A /\ ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) ) -> ( B R C -> -. ( B = C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	sotritric 4419	A trichotomy relationship, given a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2019.)
|- R Or A   &    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C \/ B = C \/ C R B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C <-> -. ( B = C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	sotritrieq 4420	A trichotomy relationship, given a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2019.)
|- R Or A   &    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B R C \/ B = C \/ C R B ) )   =>    |- ( ( B e. A /\ C e. A ) -> ( B = C <-> -. ( B R C \/ C R B ) ) )
Theorem	so0 4421	Any relation is a strict ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- R Or (/)
2.3.9  Founded and set-like relations
Syntax	wfrfor 4422	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate.
wff FrFor R A S
Syntax	wfr 4423	Extend wff notation to include the well-founded predicate. Read: ' R is a well-founded relation on A.'
wff R Fr A
Syntax	wse 4424	Extend wff notation to include the set-like predicate. Read: ' R is set-like on A.'
wff R Se A
Syntax	wwe 4425	Extend wff notation to include the well-ordering predicate. Read: ' R well-orders A.'
wff R We A
Definition	df-frfor 4426*	Define the well-founded relation predicate where A might be a proper class. By passing in S we allow it potentially to be a proper class rather than a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- (FrFor R A S <-> ( A. x e. A ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> y e. S ) -> x e. S ) -> A C_ S ) )
Definition	df-frind 4427*	Define the well-founded relation predicate. In the presence of excluded middle, there are a variety of equivalent ways to define this. In our case, this definition, in terms of an inductive principle, works better than one along the lines of "there is an element which is minimal when A is ordered by R". Because s is constrained to be a set (not a proper class) here, sometimes it may be necessary to use FrFor directly rather than via Fr. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon and Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R Fr A <-> A. sFrFor R A s )
Definition	df-se 4428*	Define the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
|- ( R Se A <-> A. x e. A { y e. A | y R x } e. _V )
Definition	df-wetr 4429*	Define the well-ordering predicate. It is unusual to define "well-ordering" in the absence of excluded middle, but we mean an ordering which is like the ordering which we have for ordinals (for example, it does not entail trichotomy because ordinals do not have that as seen at ordtriexmid 4617). Given excluded middle, well-ordering is usually defined to require trichotomy (and the definition of Fr is typically also different). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R We A <-> ( R Fr A /\ A. x e. A A. y e. A A. z e. A ( ( x R y /\ y R z ) -> x R z ) ) )
Theorem	seex 4430*	The R-preimage of an element of the base set in a set-like relation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2014.)
|- ( ( R Se A /\ B e. A ) -> { x e. A | x R B } e. _V )
Theorem	exse 4431	Any relation on a set is set-like on it. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A e. V -> R Se A )
Theorem	sess1 4432	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( R C_ S -> ( S Se A -> R Se A ) )
Theorem	sess2 4433	Subset theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A C_ B -> ( R Se B -> R Se A ) )
Theorem	seeq1 4434	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Se A <-> S Se A ) )
Theorem	seeq2 4435	Equality theorem for the set-like predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Se A <-> R Se B ) )
Theorem	nfse 4436	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for set-like relations. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R Se A
Theorem	epse 4437	The epsilon relation is set-like on any class. (This is the origin of the term "set-like": a set-like relation "acts like" the epsilon relation of sets and their elements.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- _E Se A
Theorem	frforeq1 4438	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( R = S -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor S A T ) )
Theorem	freq1 4439	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R Fr A <-> S Fr A ) )
Theorem	frforeq2 4440	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( A = B -> (FrFor R A T <-> FrFor R B T ) )
Theorem	freq2 4441	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R Fr A <-> R Fr B ) )
Theorem	frforeq3 4442	Equality theorem for the well-founded predicate. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Sep-2021.)
|- ( S = T -> (FrFor R A S <-> FrFor R A T ) )
Theorem	nffrfor 4443	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x S   =>    |- F/ xFrFor R A S
Theorem	nffr 4444	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R Fr A
Theorem	frirrg 4445	A well-founded relation is irreflexive. This is the case where A exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( R Fr A /\ A e. V /\ B e. A ) -> -. B R B )
Theorem	fr0 4446	Any relation is well-founded on the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- R Fr (/)
Theorem	frind 4447*	Induction over a well-founded set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Sep-2021.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ( ch /\ x e. A ) -> ( A. y e. A ( y R x -> ps ) -> ph ) )   &    |- ( ch -> R Fr A )   &    |- ( ch -> A e. V )   =>    |- ( ( ch /\ x e. A ) -> ph )
Theorem	efrirr 4448	Irreflexivity of the epsilon relation: a class founded by epsilon is not a member of itself. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2015.)
|- ( _E Fr A -> -. A e. A )
Theorem	tz7.2 4449	Similar to Theorem 7.2 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 35, of except that the Axiom of Regularity is not required due to antecedent _E Fr A. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ _E Fr A /\ B e. A ) -> ( B C_ A /\ B =/= A ) )
Theorem	nfwe 4450	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for well-orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x R   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/ x R We A
Theorem	weeq1 4451	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1997.)
|- ( R = S -> ( R We A <-> S We A ) )
Theorem	weeq2 4452	Equality theorem for the well-ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( A = B -> ( R We A <-> R We B ) )
Theorem	wefr 4453	A well-ordering is well-founded. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( R We A -> R Fr A )
Theorem	wepo 4454	A well-ordering is a partial ordering. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Sep-2021.)
|- ( ( R We A /\ A e. V ) -> R Po A )
Theorem	wetrep 4455*	An epsilon well-ordering is a transitive relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( _E We A /\ ( x e. A /\ y e. A /\ z e. A ) ) -> ( ( x e. y /\ y e. z ) -> x e. z ) )
Theorem	we0 4456	Any relation is a well-ordering of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
|- R We (/)
2.3.10  Ordinals
Syntax	word 4457	Extend the definition of a wff to include the ordinal predicate.
wff Ord A
Syntax	con0 4458	Extend the definition of a class to include the class of all ordinal numbers. (The 0 in the name prevents creating a file called con.html, which causes problems in Windows.)
class On
Syntax	wlim 4459	Extend the definition of a wff to include the limit ordinal predicate.
wff Lim A
Syntax	csuc 4460	Extend class notation to include the successor function.
class suc A
Definition	df-iord 4461*	Define the ordinal predicate, which is true for a class that is transitive and whose elements are transitive. Definition of ordinal in [Crosilla], p. "Set-theoretic principles incompatible with intuitionistic logic". Some sources will define a notation for ordinal order corresponding to < and <_ but we just use e. and C_ respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Oct-2018.) Use its alias dford3 4462 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Ord A <-> ( Tr A /\ A. x e. A Tr x ) )
Theorem	dford3 4462*	Alias for df-iord 4461. Use it instead of df-iord 4461 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Oct-2018.)
|- ( Ord A <-> ( Tr A /\ A. x e. A Tr x ) )
Definition	df-on 4463	Define the class of all ordinal numbers. Definition 7.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 38. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- On = { x | Ord x }
Definition	df-ilim 4464	Define the limit ordinal predicate, which is true for an ordinal that has the empty set as an element and is not a successor (i.e. that is the union of itself). Our definition combines the definition of Lim of [BellMachover] p. 471 and Exercise 1 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 42, and then changes A =/= (/) to (/) e. A (which would be equivalent given the law of the excluded middle, but which is not for us). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2018.) Use its alias dflim2 4465 instead for naming consistency with set.mm. (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Theorem	dflim2 4465	Alias for df-ilim 4464. Use it instead of df-ilim 4464 for naming consistency with set.mm. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2004.)
|- ( Lim A <-> ( Ord A /\ (/) e. A /\ A = U. A ) )
Definition	df-suc 4466	Define the successor of a class. When applied to an ordinal number, the successor means the same thing as "plus 1". Definition 7.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41, who use "+ 1" to denote this function. Our definition is a generalization to classes. Although it is not conventional to use it with proper classes, it has no effect on a proper class (sucprc 4507). Some authors denote the successor operation with a prime (apostrophe-like) symbol, such as Definition 6 of [Suppes] p. 134 and the definition of successor in [Mendelson] p. 246 (who uses the symbol "Suc" as a predicate to mean "is a successor ordinal"). The definition of successor of [Enderton] p. 68 denotes the operation with a plus-sign superscript. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- suc A = ( A u. { A } )
Theorem	ordeq 4467	Equality theorem for the ordinal predicate. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Ord A <-> Ord B ) )
Theorem	elong 4468	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. On <-> Ord A ) )
Theorem	elon 4469	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- A e. _V   =>    |- ( A e. On <-> Ord A )
Theorem	eloni 4470	An ordinal number has the ordinal property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. On -> Ord A )
Theorem	elon2 4471	An ordinal number is an ordinal set. (Contributed by NM, 8-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A e. On <-> ( Ord A /\ A e. _V ) )
Theorem	limeq 4472	Equality theorem for the limit predicate. (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> ( Lim A <-> Lim B ) )
Theorem	ordtr 4473	An ordinal class is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.)
|- ( Ord A -> Tr A )
Theorem	ordelss 4474	An element of an ordinal class is a subset of it. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B C_ A )
Theorem	trssord 4475	A transitive subclass of an ordinal class is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Tr A /\ A C_ B /\ Ord B ) -> Ord A )
Theorem	ordelord 4476	An element of an ordinal class is ordinal. Proposition 7.6 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 36. (Contributed by NM, 23-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> Ord B )
Theorem	tron 4477	The class of all ordinal numbers is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2009.)
|- Tr On
Theorem	ordelon 4478	An element of an ordinal class is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	onelon 4479	An element of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Theorem 2.2(iii) of [BellMachover] p. 469. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. A ) -> B e. On )
Theorem	ordin 4480	The intersection of two ordinal classes is ordinal. Proposition 7.9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 37. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1994.)
|- ( ( Ord A /\ Ord B ) -> Ord ( A i^i B ) )
Theorem	onin 4481	The intersection of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 7-Apr-1995.)
|- ( ( A e. On /\ B e. On ) -> ( A i^i B ) e. On )
Theorem	onelss 4482	An element of an ordinal number is a subset of the number. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A e. On -> ( B e. A -> B C_ A ) )
Theorem	ordtr1 4483	Transitive law for ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 12-Dec-2004.)
|- ( Ord C -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	ontr1 4484	Transitive law for ordinal numbers. Theorem 7M(b) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
|- ( C e. On -> ( ( A e. B /\ B e. C ) -> A e. C ) )
Theorem	onintss 4485*	If a property is true for an ordinal number, then the minimum ordinal number for which it is true is smaller or equal. Theorem Schema 61 of [Suppes] p. 228. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A e. On -> ( ps -> |^| { x e. On | ph } C_ A ) )
Theorem	ord0 4486	The empty set is an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-1994.)
|- Ord (/)
Theorem	0elon 4487	The empty set is an ordinal number. Corollary 7N(b) of [Enderton] p. 193. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1993.)
|- (/) e. On
Theorem	inton 4488	The intersection of the class of ordinal numbers is the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2003.)
|- |^| On = (/)
Theorem	nlim0 4489	The empty set is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- -. Lim (/)
Theorem	limord 4490	A limit ordinal is ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> Ord A )
Theorem	limuni 4491	A limit ordinal is its own supremum (union). (Contributed by NM, 4-May-1995.)
|- ( Lim A -> A = U. A )
Theorem	limuni2 4492	The union of a limit ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 19-Sep-2006.)
|- ( Lim A -> Lim U. A )
Theorem	0ellim 4493	A limit ordinal contains the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1994.)
|- ( Lim A -> (/) e. A )
Theorem	limelon 4494	A limit ordinal class that is also a set is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2004.)
|- ( ( A e. B /\ Lim A ) -> A e. On )
Theorem	onn0 4495	The class of all ordinal numbers is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-1995.)
|- On =/= (/)
Theorem	onm 4496	The class of all ordinal numbers is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Mar-2019.)
|- E. x x e. On
Theorem	suceq 4497	Equality of successors. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.)
|- ( A = B -> suc A = suc B )
Theorem	elsuci 4498	Membership in a successor. This one-way implication does not require that either A or B be sets. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-1994.)
|- ( A e. suc B -> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) )
Theorem	elsucg 4499	Membership in a successor. Exercise 5 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 17. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1995.)
|- ( A e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )
Theorem	elsuc2g 4500	Variant of membership in a successor, requiring that B rather than A be a set. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-2003.)
|- ( B e. V -> ( A e. suc B <-> ( A e. B \/ A = B ) ) )