Theorem iotass 5197

Description: Value of iota based on a proposition which holds only for values which are subsets of a given class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iotass	|- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> ( iota x ph ) C_ A )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hint:   ph( x)

Proof of Theorem iotass

Dummy variable y is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-iota 5180	. 2 |- ( iota x ph ) = U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } }
2		unieq 3820	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( { x | ph } = { y } -> U. { x | ph } = U. { y } )
3		vex 2742	. . . . . . . . 9 |- y e. _V
4	3	unisn 3827	. . . . . . . 8 |- U. { y } = y
5	2, 4	eqtrdi 2226	. . . . . . 7 |- ( { x | ph } = { y } -> U. { x | ph } = y )
6		df-pw 3579	. . . . . . . . . . 11 |- ~P A = { x | x C_ A }
7	6	sseq2i 3184	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( { x | ph } C_ ~P A <-> { x | ph } C_ { x | x C_ A } )
8		ss2ab 3225	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( { x | ph } C_ { x | x C_ A } <-> A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) )
9	7, 8	bitri 184	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( { x | ph } C_ ~P A <-> A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) )
10	9	biimpri 133	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> { x | ph } C_ ~P A )
11		sspwuni 3973	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( { x | ph } C_ ~P A <-> U. { x | ph } C_ A )
12	10, 11	sylib 122	. . . . . . 7 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> U. { x | ph } C_ A )
13		sseq1 3180	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( U. { x | ph } = y -> ( U. { x | ph } C_ A <-> y C_ A ) )
14	13	biimpa 296	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( U. { x | ph } = y /\ U. { x | ph } C_ A ) -> y C_ A )
15	5, 12, 14	syl2anr 290	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) /\ { x | ph } = { y } ) -> y C_ A )
16	15	ex 115	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> ( { x | ph } = { y } -> y C_ A ) )
17	16	ss2abdv 3230	. . . 4 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> { y | { x | ph } = { y } } C_ { y | y C_ A } )
18		df-pw 3579	. . . 4 |- ~P A = { y | y C_ A }
19	17, 18	sseqtrrdi 3206	. . 3 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> { y | { x | ph } = { y } } C_ ~P A )
20		sspwuni 3973	. . 3 |- ( { y | { x | ph } = { y } } C_ ~P A <-> U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } } C_ A )
21	19, 20	sylib 122	. 2 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> U. { y | { x | ph } = { y } } C_ A )
22	1, 21	eqsstrid 3203	1 |- ( A. x ( ph -> x C_ A ) -> ( iota x ph ) C_ A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   A.wal 1351   = wceq 1353   {cab 2163   C_ wss 3131   ~Pcpw 3577   {csn 3594   U.cuni 3811   iotacio 5178

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-ext 2159

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-v 2741  df-un 3135  df-in 3137  df-ss 3144  df-pw 3579  df-sn 3600  df-pr 3601  df-uni 3812  df-iota 5180

This theorem is referenced by:  fvss  5531  riotaexg  5837