Theorem resoprab 6041

Description: Restriction of an operation class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
resoprab	|- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Distinct variable groups:   x, y, z, A   x, B, y, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y, z)

Proof of Theorem resoprab

Dummy variable w is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		resopab 5003	. . 3 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) }
2		19.42vv 1935	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) )
3		an12 561	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
4		eleq1 2268	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) ) )
5		opelxp 4705	. . . . . . . . . 10 |- ( <. x , y >. e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) )
6	4, 5	bitrdi 196	. . . . . . . . 9 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( w e. ( A X. B ) <-> ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) ) )
7	6	anbi1d 465	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( w = <. x , y >. -> ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) <-> ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
8	7	pm5.32i 454	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
9	3, 8	bitri 184	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
10	9	2exbii 1629	. . . . 5 |- ( E. x E. y ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
11	2, 10	bitr3i 186	. . . 4 |- ( ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) <-> E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) )
12	11	opabbii 4111	. . 3 |- { <. w , z >. | ( w e. ( A X. B ) /\ E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
13	1, 12	eqtri 2226	. 2 |- ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
14		dfoprab2 5992	. . 3 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) }
15	14	reseq1i 4955	. 2 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = ( { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ph ) } |` ( A X. B ) )
16		dfoprab2 5992	. 2 |- { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) } = { <. w , z >. | E. x E. y ( w = <. x , y >. /\ ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) ) }
17	13, 15, 16	3eqtr4i 2236	1 |- ( { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ph } |` ( A X. B ) ) = { <. <. x , y >. , z >. | ( ( x e. A /\ y e. B ) /\ ph ) }

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   E.wex 1515   e. wcel 2176   <.cop 3636   {copab 4104   X. cxp 4673   |` cres 4677   {coprab 5945

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-bndl 1532  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557  ax-i5r 1558  ax-14 2179  ax-ext 2187  ax-sep 4162  ax-pow 4218  ax-pr 4253

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786  df-clab 2192  df-cleq 2198  df-clel 2201  df-nfc 2337  df-ral 2489  df-rex 2490  df-v 2774  df-un 3170  df-in 3172  df-ss 3179  df-pw 3618  df-sn 3639  df-pr 3640  df-op 3642  df-opab 4106  df-xp 4681  df-rel 4682  df-res 4687  df-oprab 5948

This theorem is referenced by:  resoprab2  6042