Theorem strslfv2 12961

Description: A variation on strslfv 12962 to avoid asserting that S itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of S. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfv2.s	|- S e. _V
strfv2.f	|- Fun `' `' S
strslfv2.e	|- ( E = Slot ( E ` ndx ) /\ ( E ` ndx ) e. NN )
strfv2.n	|- <. ( E ` ndx ) , C >. e. S

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strslfv2	|- ( C e. V -> C = ( E ` S ) )

Proof of Theorem strslfv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strslfv2.e	. 2 |- ( E = Slot ( E ` ndx ) /\ ( E ` ndx ) e. NN )
2		strfv2.s	. . 3 |- S e. _V
3	2	a1i 9	. 2 |- ( C e. V -> S e. _V )
4		strfv2.f	. . 3 |- Fun `' `' S
5	4	a1i 9	. 2 |- ( C e. V -> Fun `' `' S )
6		strfv2.n	. . 3 |- <. ( E ` ndx ) , C >. e. S
7	6	a1i 9	. 2 |- ( C e. V -> <. ( E ` ndx ) , C >. e. S )
8		id 19	. 2 |- ( C e. V -> C e. V )
9	1, 3, 5, 7, 8	strslfv2d 12960	1 |- ( C e. V -> C = ( E ` S ) )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   = wceq 1373   e. wcel 2177   _Vcvv 2773   <.cop 3641   `'ccnv 4687   Fun wfun 5279   ` cfv 5285   NNcn 9066   ndxcnx 12914  Slot cslot 12916

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2179  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-sep 4173  ax-pow 4229  ax-pr 4264  ax-un 4493

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 983  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-eu 2058  df-mo 2059  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-ral 2490  df-rex 2491  df-v 2775  df-sbc 3003  df-un 3174  df-in 3176  df-ss 3183  df-pw 3623  df-sn 3644  df-pr 3645  df-op 3647  df-uni 3860  df-br 4055  df-opab 4117  df-mpt 4118  df-id 4353  df-xp 4694  df-rel 4695  df-cnv 4696  df-co 4697  df-dm 4698  df-rn 4699  df-res 4700  df-iota 5246  df-fun 5287  df-fv 5293  df-slot 12921

This theorem is referenced by: (None)