Theorem strslfv2 12470

Description: A variation on strslfv 12471 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfv2.s	⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
strfv2.f	⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
strslfv2.e	⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
strfv2.n	⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strslfv2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strslfv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strslfv2.e	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
2		strfv2.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 ∈ V)
4		strfv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
5	4	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)
6		strfv2.n	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆
7	6	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)
8		id 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
9	1, 3, 5, 7, 8	strslfv2d 12469	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   = wceq 1353   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 2735  ⟨cop 3592  ^◡ccnv 4619  Fun wfun 5202  ‘cfv 5208  ℕcn 8890  ndxcnx 12424  Slot cslot 12426

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 709  ax-5 1445  ax-7 1446  ax-gen 1447  ax-ie1 1491  ax-ie2 1492  ax-8 1502  ax-10 1503  ax-11 1504  ax-i12 1505  ax-bndl 1507  ax-4 1508  ax-17 1524  ax-i9 1528  ax-ial 1532  ax-i5r 1533  ax-13 2148  ax-14 2149  ax-ext 2157  ax-sep 4116  ax-pow 4169  ax-pr 4203  ax-un 4427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1459  df-sb 1761  df-eu 2027  df-mo 2028  df-clab 2162  df-cleq 2168  df-clel 2171  df-nfc 2306  df-ral 2458  df-rex 2459  df-v 2737  df-sbc 2961  df-un 3131  df-in 3133  df-ss 3140  df-pw 3574  df-sn 3595  df-pr 3596  df-op 3598  df-uni 3806  df-br 3999  df-opab 4060  df-mpt 4061  df-id 4287  df-xp 4626  df-rel 4627  df-cnv 4628  df-co 4629  df-dm 4630  df-rn 4631  df-res 4632  df-iota 5170  df-fun 5210  df-fv 5216  df-slot 12431

This theorem is referenced by: (None)