Theorem strslfv2 12374

Description: A variation on strslfv 12375 to avoid asserting that 𝑆 itself is a function, which involves sethood of all the ordered pair components of 𝑆. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jan-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
strfv2.s	⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
strfv2.f	⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
strslfv2.e	⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
strfv2.n	⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆

Assertion

Ref	Expression
strslfv2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Proof of Theorem strslfv2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		strslfv2.e	. 2 ⊢ (𝐸 = Slot (𝐸‘ndx) ∧ (𝐸‘ndx) ∈ ℕ)
2		strfv2.s	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V
3	2	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑆 ∈ V)
4		strfv2.f	. . 3 ⊢ Fun ◡◡𝑆
5	4	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → Fun ◡◡𝑆)
6		strfv2.n	. . 3 ⊢ ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆
7	6	a1i 9	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → ⟨(𝐸‘ndx), 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝑆)
8		id 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)
9	1, 3, 5, 7, 8	strslfv2d 12373	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐶 = (𝐸‘𝑆))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   = wceq 1342   ∈ wcel 2135  Vcvv 2721  ⟨cop 3573  ^◡ccnv 4597  Fun wfun 5176  ‘cfv 5182  ℕcn 8848  ndxcnx 12328  Slot cslot 12330

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 699  ax-5 1434  ax-7 1435  ax-gen 1436  ax-ie1 1480  ax-ie2 1481  ax-8 1491  ax-10 1492  ax-11 1493  ax-i12 1494  ax-bndl 1496  ax-4 1497  ax-17 1513  ax-i9 1517  ax-ial 1521  ax-i5r 1522  ax-13 2137  ax-14 2138  ax-ext 2146  ax-sep 4094  ax-pow 4147  ax-pr 4181  ax-un 4405

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 969  df-tru 1345  df-nf 1448  df-sb 1750  df-eu 2016  df-mo 2017  df-clab 2151  df-cleq 2157  df-clel 2160  df-nfc 2295  df-ral 2447  df-rex 2448  df-v 2723  df-sbc 2947  df-un 3115  df-in 3117  df-ss 3124  df-pw 3555  df-sn 3576  df-pr 3577  df-op 3579  df-uni 3784  df-br 3977  df-opab 4038  df-mpt 4039  df-id 4265  df-xp 4604  df-rel 4605  df-cnv 4606  df-co 4607  df-dm 4608  df-rn 4609  df-res 4610  df-iota 5147  df-fun 5184  df-fv 5190  df-slot 12335

This theorem is referenced by: (None)