Theorem bj-unexg 15995

Description: unexg 4498 from bounded separation. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-unexg	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem bj-unexg

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		uneq1 3324	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦))
2		eleq1 2269	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) → ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V))
3	1, 2	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V))
4		uneq2 3325	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
5		eleq1 2269	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) = (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V))
6	4, 5	syl 14	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V ↔ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V))
7		vex 2776	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑥 ∈ V
8		vex 2776	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
9	7, 8	bj-unex 15993	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ V
10	3, 6, 9	vtocl2g 2839	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1373   ∈ wcel 2177  Vcvv 2773   ∪ cun 3168

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-13 2179  ax-14 2180  ax-ext 2188  ax-pr 4261  ax-un 4488  ax-bd0 15887  ax-bdor 15890  ax-bdex 15893  ax-bdeq 15894  ax-bdel 15895  ax-bdsb 15896  ax-bdsep 15958

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-tru 1376  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2193  df-cleq 2199  df-clel 2202  df-nfc 2338  df-rex 2491  df-v 2775  df-un 3174  df-sn 3644  df-pr 3645  df-uni 3857  df-bdc 15915

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-sucexg  15996