ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  cbvoprab2 GIF version

Theorem cbvoprab2 5970
Description: Change the second bound variable in an operation abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
cbvoprab2.1 𝑤𝜑
cbvoprab2.2 𝑦𝜓
cbvoprab2.3 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑𝜓))
Assertion
Ref Expression
cbvoprab2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑤,𝑦,𝑧
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤)

Proof of Theorem cbvoprab2
Dummy variable 𝑣 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 nfv 1539 . . . . . . 7 𝑤 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧
2 cbvoprab2.1 . . . . . . 7 𝑤𝜑
31, 2nfan 1576 . . . . . 6 𝑤(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
43nfex 1648 . . . . 5 𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
5 nfv 1539 . . . . . . 7 𝑦 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧
6 cbvoprab2.2 . . . . . . 7 𝑦𝜓
75, 6nfan 1576 . . . . . 6 𝑦(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)
87nfex 1648 . . . . 5 𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)
9 opeq2 3794 . . . . . . . . 9 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩)
109opeq1d 3799 . . . . . . . 8 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩)
1110eqeq2d 2201 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ↔ 𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩))
12 cbvoprab2.3 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (𝜑𝜓))
1311, 12anbi12d 473 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → ((𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
1413exbidv 1836 . . . . 5 (𝑦 = 𝑤 → (∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
154, 8, 14cbvex 1767 . . . 4 (∃𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
1615exbii 1616 . . 3 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
1716abbii 2305 . 2 {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
18 df-oprab 5901 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
19 df-oprab 5901 . 2 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑣 ∣ ∃𝑥𝑤𝑧(𝑣 = ⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
2017, 18, 193eqtr4i 2220 1 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑤⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wa 104  wb 105   = wceq 1364  wnf 1471  wex 1503  {cab 2175  cop 3610  {coprab 5898
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-io 710  ax-5 1458  ax-7 1459  ax-gen 1460  ax-ie1 1504  ax-ie2 1505  ax-8 1515  ax-10 1516  ax-11 1517  ax-i12 1518  ax-bndl 1520  ax-4 1521  ax-17 1537  ax-i9 1541  ax-ial 1545  ax-i5r 1546  ax-ext 2171
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 982  df-tru 1367  df-nf 1472  df-sb 1774  df-clab 2176  df-cleq 2182  df-clel 2185  df-nfc 2321  df-v 2754  df-un 3148  df-sn 3613  df-pr 3614  df-op 3616  df-oprab 5901
This theorem is referenced by: (None)
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator