Theorem cbvreu 2650

Description: Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvral.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
cbvral.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvral.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvreu	⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem cbvreu

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1508	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)
2	1	sb8eu 2010	. . 3 ⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		sban 1926	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4	3	eubii 2006	. . 3 ⊢ (∃!𝑧[𝑧 / 𝑥](𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑧([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
5		clelsb3 2242	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
6	5	anbi1i 453	. . . . 5 ⊢ (([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
7	6	eubii 2006	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃!𝑧([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
8		nfv 1508	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴
9		cbvral.1	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
10	9	nfsb 1917	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑
11	8, 10	nfan 1544	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
12		nfv 1508	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)
13		eleq1 2200	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
14		sbequ 1812	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
15		cbvral.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
16		cbvral.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
17	15, 16	sbie 1764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
18	14, 17	syl6bb 195	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
19	13, 18	anbi12d 464	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑦 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓)))
20	11, 12, 19	cbveu 2021	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃!𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
21	7, 20	bitri 183	. . 3 ⊢ (∃!𝑧([𝑧 / 𝑥]𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
22	2, 4, 21	3bitri 205	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
23		df-reu 2421	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
24		df-reu 2421	. 2 ⊢ (∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜓))
25	22, 23, 24	3bitr4i 211	1 ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 103   ↔ wb 104  Ⅎwnf 1436   ∈ wcel 1480  [wsb 1735  ∃!weu 1997  ∃!wreu 2416

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2119

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2000  df-cleq 2130  df-clel 2133  df-reu 2421

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvrmo  2651  cbvreuv  2654