![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > intexrabim | GIF version |
Description: The intersection of an inhabited restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexrabim | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | intexabim 4151 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
2 | df-rex 2461 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
3 | df-rab 2464 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
4 | 3 | inteqi 3848 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | 4 | eleq1i 2243 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3imtr4i 201 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∃wex 1492 ∈ wcel 2148 {cab 2163 ∃wrex 2456 {crab 2459 Vcvv 2737 ∩ cint 3844 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 709 ax-5 1447 ax-7 1448 ax-gen 1449 ax-ie1 1493 ax-ie2 1494 ax-8 1504 ax-10 1505 ax-11 1506 ax-i12 1507 ax-bndl 1509 ax-4 1510 ax-17 1526 ax-i9 1530 ax-ial 1534 ax-i5r 1535 ax-ext 2159 ax-sep 4120 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1356 df-nf 1461 df-sb 1763 df-clab 2164 df-cleq 2170 df-clel 2173 df-nfc 2308 df-ral 2460 df-rex 2461 df-rab 2464 df-v 2739 df-in 3135 df-ss 3142 df-int 3845 |
This theorem is referenced by: cardcl 7177 isnumi 7178 cardval3ex 7181 clsval 13482 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |