Theorem intexrabim 3957

Description: The intersection of an inhabited restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
intexrabim	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Proof of Theorem intexrabim

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		intexabim 3956	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
2		df-rex 2361	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
3		df-rab 2364	. . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
4	3	inteqi 3669	. . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)}
5	4	eleq1i 2150	. 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V)
6	1, 2, 5	3imtr4i 199	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 102  ∃wex 1424   ∈ wcel 1436  {cab 2071  ∃wrex 2356  {crab 2359  Vcvv 2614  ∩ cint 3665

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 663  ax-5 1379  ax-7 1380  ax-gen 1381  ax-ie1 1425  ax-ie2 1426  ax-8 1438  ax-10 1439  ax-11 1440  ax-i12 1441  ax-bndl 1442  ax-4 1443  ax-17 1462  ax-i9 1466  ax-ial 1470  ax-i5r 1471  ax-ext 2067  ax-sep 3925

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1290  df-nf 1393  df-sb 1690  df-clab 2072  df-cleq 2078  df-clel 2081  df-nfc 2214  df-ral 2360  df-rex 2361  df-rab 2364  df-v 2616  df-in 2992  df-ss 2999  df-int 3666

This theorem is referenced by:  cardcl  6730  isnumi  6731  cardval3ex  6734