![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > intexrabim | GIF version |
Description: The intersection of an inhabited restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexrabim | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | intexabim 4181 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
2 | df-rex 2478 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
3 | df-rab 2481 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
4 | 3 | inteqi 3874 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | 4 | eleq1i 2259 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3imtr4i 201 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 104 ∃wex 1503 ∈ wcel 2164 {cab 2179 ∃wrex 2473 {crab 2476 Vcvv 2760 ∩ cint 3870 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-io 710 ax-5 1458 ax-7 1459 ax-gen 1460 ax-ie1 1504 ax-ie2 1505 ax-8 1515 ax-10 1516 ax-11 1517 ax-i12 1518 ax-bndl 1520 ax-4 1521 ax-17 1537 ax-i9 1541 ax-ial 1545 ax-i5r 1546 ax-ext 2175 ax-sep 4147 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-nf 1472 df-sb 1774 df-clab 2180 df-cleq 2186 df-clel 2189 df-nfc 2325 df-ral 2477 df-rex 2478 df-rab 2481 df-v 2762 df-in 3159 df-ss 3166 df-int 3871 |
This theorem is referenced by: cardcl 7241 isnumi 7242 cardval3ex 7245 lspval 13886 clsval 14279 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |