![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > intexrabim | GIF version |
Description: The intersection of an inhabited restricted class abstraction exists. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Aug-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
intexrabim | ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | intexabim 3956 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) | |
2 | df-rex 2361 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)) | |
3 | df-rab 2364 | . . . 4 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} | |
4 | 3 | inteqi 3669 | . . 3 ⊢ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} |
5 | 4 | eleq1i 2150 | . 2 ⊢ (∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ↔ ∩ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑)} ∈ V) |
6 | 1, 2, 5 | 3imtr4i 199 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 102 ∃wex 1424 ∈ wcel 1436 {cab 2071 ∃wrex 2356 {crab 2359 Vcvv 2614 ∩ cint 3665 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 104 ax-ia2 105 ax-ia3 106 ax-io 663 ax-5 1379 ax-7 1380 ax-gen 1381 ax-ie1 1425 ax-ie2 1426 ax-8 1438 ax-10 1439 ax-11 1440 ax-i12 1441 ax-bndl 1442 ax-4 1443 ax-17 1462 ax-i9 1466 ax-ial 1470 ax-i5r 1471 ax-ext 2067 ax-sep 3925 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 115 df-tru 1290 df-nf 1393 df-sb 1690 df-clab 2072 df-cleq 2078 df-clel 2081 df-nfc 2214 df-ral 2360 df-rex 2361 df-rab 2364 df-v 2616 df-in 2992 df-ss 2999 df-int 3666 |
This theorem is referenced by: cardcl 6730 isnumi 6731 cardval3ex 6734 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |