![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > tfrlem3 | GIF version |
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. Let 𝐴 be the class of "acceptable" functions. The final thing we're interested in is the union of all these acceptable functions. This lemma just changes some bound variables in 𝐴 for later use. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-1995.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3.1 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
tfrlem3 | ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | tfrlem3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | |
2 | vex 2623 | . . 3 ⊢ 𝑔 ∈ V | |
3 | 1, 2 | tfrlem3a 6089 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑔 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))) |
4 | 3 | abbi2i 2203 | 1 ⊢ 𝐴 = {𝑔 ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ On (𝑔 Fn 𝑧 ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 (𝑔‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘(𝑔 ↾ 𝑤)))} |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ∧ wa 103 = wceq 1290 {cab 2075 ∀wral 2360 ∃wrex 2361 Oncon0 4199 ↾ cres 4454 Fn wfn 5023 ‘cfv 5028 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-io 666 ax-5 1382 ax-7 1383 ax-gen 1384 ax-ie1 1428 ax-ie2 1429 ax-8 1441 ax-10 1442 ax-11 1443 ax-i12 1444 ax-bndl 1445 ax-4 1446 ax-17 1465 ax-i9 1469 ax-ial 1473 ax-i5r 1474 ax-ext 2071 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-3an 927 df-tru 1293 df-nf 1396 df-sb 1694 df-clab 2076 df-cleq 2082 df-clel 2085 df-nfc 2218 df-ral 2365 df-rex 2366 df-v 2622 df-un 3004 df-in 3006 df-ss 3013 df-sn 3456 df-pr 3457 df-op 3459 df-uni 3660 df-br 3852 df-opab 3906 df-xp 4458 df-rel 4459 df-cnv 4460 df-co 4461 df-dm 4462 df-res 4464 df-iota 4993 df-fun 5030 df-fn 5031 df-fv 5036 |
This theorem is referenced by: tfrlem4 6092 tfrlem8 6097 tfrlemi1 6111 tfrexlem 6113 tfri1d 6114 tfrex 6147 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |