P. 64 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6301-6400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	releldm2 6301*	Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	reldm 6302*	An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥)))
Theorem	sbcopeq1a 6303	Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog of sbceq1a 3018 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4309). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ([(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	csbopeq1a 6304	Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ in 𝐵 (analog of csbeq1a 3113). (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → ⦋(1st ‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵)
Theorem	dfopab2 6305*	A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣ [(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑}
Theorem	dfoprab3s 6306*	A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ [(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)}
Theorem	dfoprab3 6307*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	dfoprab4 6308*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfoprab4f 6309*	Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers. (Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑤, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)}
Theorem	dfxp3 6310*	Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4702. (Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	elopabi 6311*	A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒)
Theorem	eloprabi 6312*	A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃)
Theorem	mpomptsx 6313*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶)
Theorem	mpompts 6314*	Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶)
Theorem	dmmpossx 6315*	The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵)
Theorem	fmpox 6316*	Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to notation, where 𝐵(𝑥) is not constant but depends on 𝑥. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵)⟶𝐷)
Theorem	fmpo 6317*	Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐷)
Theorem	fnmpo 6318*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	fnmpoi 6319*	Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	dmmpo 6320*	Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)
Theorem	mpofvex 6321*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V)
Theorem	mpofvexi 6322*	Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V
Theorem	ovmpoelrn 6323*	An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ∈ 𝑀)
Theorem	dmmpoga 6324*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6320. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	dmmpog 6325*	Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6320. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	mpoexxg 6326*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mpoexg 6327*	Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	mpoexga 6328*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V)
Theorem	mpoexw 6329*	Weak version of mpoex 6330 that holds without ax-coll 4178. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V
Theorem	mpoex 6330*	If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V
Theorem	fnmpoovd 6331*	A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵))    &   ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷))
Theorem	fmpoco 6332*	Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5774 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇))
Theorem	oprabco 6333*	Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	oprab2co 6334*	Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑀𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹))
Theorem	df1st2 6335*	An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥} = (1st ↾ (V × V))
Theorem	df2nd2 6336*	An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦} = (2nd ↾ (V × V))
Theorem	1stconst 6337	The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝐵})):(𝐴 × {𝐵})–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	2ndconst 6338	The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd function to a converse constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ↾ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)):({𝐴} × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐵)
Theorem	dfmpo 6339*	Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 5979 (although it requires that 𝐶 be a set). (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝐶⟩}
Theorem	cnvf1olem 6340	Lemma for cnvf1o 6341. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ◡{𝐶}))
Theorem	cnvf1o 6341*	Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}):𝐴–1-1-onto→◡𝐴)
Theorem	f2ndf 6342	The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 into the codomain of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹⟶𝐵)
Theorem	fo2ndf 6343	The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–onto→ran 𝐹)
Theorem	f1o2ndf1 6344	The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a one-to-one function 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→ran 𝐹)
Theorem	algrflem 6345	Lemma for algrf and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵)
Theorem	algrflemg 6346	Lemma for algrf 12533 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵))
Theorem	xporderlem 6347*	Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩𝑇⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ↔ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑆𝑑))))
Theorem	poxp 6348*	A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵))
Theorem	spc2ed 6349*	Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	cnvoprab 6350*	The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑎 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V × V))    ⇒   ⊢ ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑎⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	f1od2 6351*	Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function of two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐽))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐷)
Theorem	disjxp1 6352*	The sets of a cartesian product are disjoint if the sets in the first argument are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	disjsnxp 6353*	The sets in the cartesian product of singletons with other sets, are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Disj 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑗} × 𝐵)
2.6.16  Special maps-to operations The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 5979) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 6053, ovmpox 6104 and fmpox 6316). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short.
Theorem	opeliunxp2f 6354*	Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 4839. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	mpoxopn0yelv 6355*	If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	mpoxopoveq 6356*	Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑})
Theorem	mpoxopovel 6357*	Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [⟨𝑉, 𝑊⟩ / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑)))
Theorem	rbropapd 6358*	Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)})    &   ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	rbropap 6359*	Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the condition 𝜓. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)})    &   ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒)))
2.6.17  Function transposition
Syntax	ctpos 6360	The transposition of a function.
class tpos 𝐹
Definition	df-tpos 6361*	Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tposss 6362	Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeq 6363	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposeqd 6364	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tposssxp 6365	The transposition is a subset of a cross product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹)
Theorem	reltpos 6366	The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹
Theorem	brtpos2 6367	Value of the transposition at a pair ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵)))
Theorem	brtpos0 6368	The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	reldmtpos 6369	Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	brtposg 6370	The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	ottposg 6371	The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	dmtpos 6372	The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹)
Theorem	rntpos 6373	The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹)
Theorem	tposexg 6374	The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V)
Theorem	ovtposg 6375	The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from ( 1 ... m ) × ( 1 ... n ) to the reals or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴))
Theorem	tposfun 6376	The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹)
Theorem	dftpos2 6377*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})))
Theorem	dftpos3 6378*	Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 4704. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝐹𝑧})
Theorem	dftpos4 6379*	Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))
Theorem	tpostpos 6380	Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V))
Theorem	tpostpos2 6381	Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹)
Theorem	tposfn2 6382	The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴))
Theorem	tposfo2 6383	Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf2 6384	The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴⟶𝐵))
Theorem	tposf12 6385	Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1→𝐵))
Theorem	tposf1o2 6386	Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵))
Theorem	tposfo 6387	The domain and codomain/range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–onto→𝐶)
Theorem	tposf 6388	The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)⟶𝐶)
Theorem	tposfn 6389	Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → tpos 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐴))
Theorem	tpos0 6390	Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ tpos ∅ = ∅
Theorem	tposco 6391	Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ tpos (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ tpos 𝐺)
Theorem	tpossym 6392*	Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥)))
Theorem	tposeqi 6393	Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺
Theorem	tposex 6394	A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ∈ V
Theorem	nftpos 6395	Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥tpos 𝐹
Theorem	tposoprab 6396*	Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	tposmpo 6397*	Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶)
2.6.18  Undefined values
Theorem	pwuninel2 6398	The power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2pwuninelg 6399	The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
2.6.19  Functions on ordinals; strictly monotone ordinal functions
Theorem	iunon 6400*	The indexed union of a set of ordinal numbers 𝐵(𝑥) is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On)