Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6301-6400 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| 2.6.15 First and second members of an ordered
pair
|
| |
| Syntax | c1st 6301 |
Extend the definition of a class to include the first member an ordered
pair function.
|
| class 1st |
| |
| Syntax | c2nd 6302 |
Extend the definition of a class to include the second member an ordered
pair function.
|
| class 2nd |
| |
| Definition | df-1st 6303 |
Define a function that extracts the first member, or abscissa, of an
ordered pair. Theorem op1st 6309 proves that it does this. For example,
(1st ‘〈 3 , 4 〉) = 3 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (i) of
[Monk1] p. 52 (compare op1sta 5218 and op1stb 4575). The notation is the same
as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 1st = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ dom {𝑥}) |
| |
| Definition | df-2nd 6304 |
Define a function that extracts the second member, or ordinate, of an
ordered pair. Theorem op2nd 6310 proves that it does this. For example,
(2nd ‘〈 3 , 4 〉) = 4 . Equivalent to Definition 5.13 (ii)
of [Monk1] p. 52 (compare op2nda 5221 and op2ndb 5220). The notation is the
same as Monk's. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 2nd = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ ∪ ran {𝑥}) |
| |
| Theorem | 1stvalg 6305 |
The value of the function that extracts the first member of an ordered
pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
8-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (1st
‘𝐴) = ∪ dom {𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | 2ndvalg 6306 |
The value of the function that extracts the second member of an ordered
pair. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
8-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → (2nd
‘𝐴) = ∪ ran {𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | 1st0 6307 |
The value of the first-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by
NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|
| ⊢ (1st ‘∅) =
∅ |
| |
| Theorem | 2nd0 6308 |
The value of the second-member function at the empty set. (Contributed by
NM, 23-Apr-2007.)
|
| ⊢ (2nd ‘∅) =
∅ |
| |
| Theorem | op1st 6309 |
Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM,
5-Oct-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (1st
‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | op2nd 6310 |
Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM,
5-Oct-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (2nd
‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | op1std 6311 |
Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (1st ‘𝐶) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | op2ndd 6312 |
Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 = 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉 → (2nd ‘𝐶) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | op1stg 6313 |
Extract the first member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM,
19-Jul-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | op2ndg 6314 |
Extract the second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM,
19-Jul-2005.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵〉) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ot1stg 6315 |
Extract the first member of an ordered triple. (Due to infrequent
usage, it isn't worthwhile at this point to define special extractors
for triples, so we reuse the ordered pair extractors for ot1stg 6315,
ot2ndg 6316, ot3rdgg 6317.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised
by
Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (1st
‘(1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉)) = 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ot2ndg 6316 |
Extract the second member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6315 comment.)
(Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
2-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd
‘(1st ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉)) = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | ot3rdgg 6317 |
Extract the third member of an ordered triple. (See ot1stg 6315 comment.)
(Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (2nd ‘〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉) = 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | 1stval2 6318 |
Alternate value of the function that extracts the first member of an
ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (i) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by
NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) →
(1st ‘𝐴)
= ∩ ∩ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | 2ndval2 6319 |
Alternate value of the function that extracts the second member of an
ordered pair. Definition 5.13 (ii) of [Monk1] p. 52. (Contributed by
NM, 18-Aug-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) →
(2nd ‘𝐴)
= ∩ ∩ ∩ ◡{𝐴}) |
| |
| Theorem | fo1st 6320 |
The 1st function maps the universe onto the
universe. (Contributed
by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 1st :V–onto→V |
| |
| Theorem | fo2nd 6321 |
The 2nd function maps the universe onto the
universe. (Contributed
by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 2nd :V–onto→V |
| |
| Theorem | f1stres 6322 |
Mapping of a restriction of the 1st (first
member of an ordered
pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | f2ndres 6323 |
Mapping of a restriction of the 2nd (second
member of an ordered
pair) function. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 8-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | fo1stresm 6324* |
Onto mapping of a restriction of the 1st
(first member of an ordered
pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | fo2ndresm 6325* |
Onto mapping of a restriction of the 2nd
(second member of an
ordered pair) function. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Jan-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (2nd ↾ (𝐴 × 𝐵)):(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | 1stcof 6326 |
Composition of the first member function with another function.
(Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2007.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | 2ndcof 6327 |
Composition of the second member function with another function.
(Contributed by FL, 15-Oct-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶(𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ∘ 𝐹):𝐴⟶𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | xp1st 6328 |
Location of the first element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xp2nd 6329 |
Location of the second element of a Cartesian product. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | 1stexg 6330 |
Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
26-Jan-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | 2ndexg 6331 |
Existence of the first member of a set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
26-Jan-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | elxp6 6332 |
Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or
dummy variables. See also elxp4 5224. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉 ∧ ((1st
‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (2nd
‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | elxp7 6333 |
Membership in a cross product. This version requires no quantifiers or
dummy variables. See also elxp4 5224. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧
((1st ‘𝐴)
∈ 𝐵 ∧
(2nd ‘𝐴)
∈ 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | oprssdmm 6334* |
Domain of closure of an operation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
23-Oct-2023.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) → ∃𝑣 𝑣 ∈ 𝑢)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑥𝐹𝑦) ∈ 𝑆)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → Rel 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | eqopi 6335 |
Equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 15-Dec-2008.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) ∧ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶)) → 𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉) |
| |
| Theorem | xp2 6336* |
Representation of cross product based on ordered pair component
functions. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) = {𝑥 ∈ (V × V) ∣
((1st ‘𝑥)
∈ 𝐴 ∧
(2nd ‘𝑥)
∈ 𝐵)} |
| |
| Theorem | unielxp 6337 |
The membership relation for a cross product is inherited by union.
(Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ ∪ (𝐵
× 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | 1st2nd2 6338 |
Reconstruction of a member of a cross product in terms of its ordered pair
components. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) |
| |
| Theorem | xpopth 6339 |
An ordered pair theorem for members of cross products. (Contributed by
NM, 20-Jun-2007.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐶 × 𝐷) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑅 × 𝑆)) → (((1st ‘𝐴) = (1st
‘𝐵) ∧
(2nd ‘𝐴)
= (2nd ‘𝐵)) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | eqop 6340 |
Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM,
3-Sep-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ∧ (2nd ‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | eqop2 6341 |
Two ways to express equality with an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM,
25-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝐶〉 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (V × V) ∧
((1st ‘𝐴)
= 𝐵 ∧ (2nd
‘𝐴) = 𝐶))) |
| |
| Theorem | op1steq 6342* |
Two ways of expressing that an element is the first member of an ordered
pair. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
23-Feb-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝑉 × 𝑊) → ((1st ‘𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = 〈𝐵, 𝑥〉)) |
| |
| Theorem | 2nd1st 6343 |
Swap the members of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) → ∪ ◡{𝐴} = 〈(2nd ‘𝐴), (1st ‘𝐴)〉) |
| |
| Theorem | 1st2nd 6344 |
Reconstruction of a member of a relation in terms of its ordered pair
components. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 〈(1st ‘𝐴), (2nd ‘𝐴)〉) |
| |
| Theorem | 1stdm 6345 |
The first ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the
domain of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (1st ‘𝐴) ∈ dom 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | 2ndrn 6346 |
The second ordered pair component of a member of a relation belongs to the
range of the relation. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2006.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅) → (2nd ‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝑅) |
| |
| Theorem | 1st2ndbr 6347 |
Express an element of a relation as a relationship between first and
second components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2016.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → (1st ‘𝐴)𝐵(2nd ‘𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | releldm2 6348* |
Two ways of expressing membership in the domain of a relation.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (1st ‘𝑥) = 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | reldm 6349* |
An expression for the domain of a relation. (Contributed by NM,
22-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → dom 𝐴 = ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (1st ‘𝑥))) |
| |
| Theorem | sbcopeq1a 6350 |
Equality theorem for substitution of a class for an ordered pair (analog
of sbceq1a 3041 that avoids the existential quantifiers of copsexg 4336).
(Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ([(1st
‘𝐴) / 𝑥][(2nd
‘𝐴) / 𝑦]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑)) |
| |
| Theorem | csbopeq1a 6351 |
Equality theorem for substitution of a class 𝐴 for an ordered pair
〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 in 𝐵 (analog of csbeq1a 3136). (Contributed by NM,
19-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → ⦋(1st
‘𝐴) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd
‘𝐴) / 𝑦⦌𝐵 = 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dfopab2 6352* |
A way to define an ordered-pair class abstraction without using
existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧 ∈ (V × V) ∣
[(1st ‘𝑧) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑧) / 𝑦]𝜑} |
| |
| Theorem | dfoprab3s 6353* |
A way to define an operation class abstraction without using existential
quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario
Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧
[(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑥][(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑦]𝜑)} |
| |
| Theorem | dfoprab3 6354* |
Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers.
(Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (V × V) ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| |
| Theorem | dfoprab4 6355* |
Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers.
(Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} |
| |
| Theorem | dfoprab4f 6356* |
Operation class abstraction expressed without existential quantifiers.
(Unnecessary distinct variable restrictions were removed by David
Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Dec-2008.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
& ⊢ (𝑤 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ {〈𝑤, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑤 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑)} = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} |
| |
| Theorem | opabex2 6357* |
Condition for an operation to be a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux,
25-Jun-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | opabn1stprc 6358* |
An ordered-pair class abstraction which does not depend on the first
abstraction variable is a proper class. There must be, however, at
least one set which satisfies the restricting wff. (Contributed by AV,
27-Dec-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (∃𝑦𝜑 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} ∉ V) |
| |
| Theorem | dfxp3 6359* |
Define the cross product of three classes. Compare df-xp 4731.
(Contributed by FL, 6-Nov-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
3-Nov-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶)} |
| |
| Theorem | elopabi 6360* |
A consequence of membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using
ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 29-Aug-2006.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘𝐴) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜒) |
| |
| Theorem | eloprabi 6361* |
A consequence of membership in an operation class abstraction, using
ordered pair extractors. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2006.) (Revised by
David Abernethy, 19-Jun-2012.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 = (1st ‘(1st
‘𝐴)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑦 = (2nd
‘(1st ‘𝐴)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = (2nd ‘𝐴) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} → 𝜃) |
| |
| Theorem | mpomptsx 6362* |
Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or
vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st
‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd
‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | mpompts 6363* |
Express a two-argument function as a one-argument function, or
vice-versa. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ⦋(1st
‘𝑧) / 𝑥⦌⦋(2nd
‘𝑧) / 𝑦⦌𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | dmmpossx 6364* |
The domain of a mapping is a subset of its base class. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 ⊆ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | fmpox 6365* |
Functionality, domain and codomain of a class given by the maps-to
notation, where 𝐵(𝑥) is not constant but depends on 𝑥.
(Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵)⟶𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | fmpo 6366* |
Functionality, domain and range of a class given by the maps-to
notation. (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ↔ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐷) |
| |
| Theorem | fnmpo 6367* |
Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation.
(Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | fnmpoi 6368* |
Functionality and domain of a class given by the maps-to notation.
(Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
& ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dmmpo 6369* |
Domain of a class given by the maps-to notation. (Contributed by FL,
17-May-2010.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
& ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | mpofvex 6370* |
Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | mpofvexi 6371* |
Sufficient condition for an operation maps-to notation to be set-like.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jul-2019.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
& ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝑆 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅𝐹𝑆) ∈ V |
| |
| Theorem | ovmpoelrn 6372* |
An operation's value belongs to its range. (Contributed by AV,
27-Jan-2020.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝑂𝑌) ∈ 𝑀) |
| |
| Theorem | dmmpoga 6373* |
Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of
dmmpo 6369. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens,
10-Feb-2019.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | dmmpog 6374* |
Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of
dmmpo 6369. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the
very special case
where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander
van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | mpoexxg 6375* |
Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent
domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | mpoexg 6376* |
Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case).
(Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
1-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | mpoexga 6377* |
If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the
operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | mpoexw 6378* |
Weak version of mpoex 6379 that holds without ax-coll 4204. If the domain
and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the
operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V |
| |
| Theorem | mpoex 6379* |
If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the
operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V |
| |
| Theorem | fnmpoovd 6380* |
A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two
arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV,
20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | fmpoco 6381* |
Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5813 when the second
function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
8-Feb-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇)) |
| |
| Theorem | oprabco 6382* |
Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by
Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro,
26-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷)
& ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
& ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) |
| |
| Theorem | oprab2co 6383* |
Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen,
2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)
& ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑀𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹)) |
| |
| Theorem | df1st2 6384* |
An alternate possible definition of the 1st
function. (Contributed
by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥} = (1st ↾ (V ×
V)) |
| |
| Theorem | df2nd2 6385* |
An alternate possible definition of the 2nd
function. (Contributed
by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦} = (2nd ↾ (V ×
V)) |
| |
| Theorem | 1stconst 6386 |
The mapping of a restriction of the 1st
function to a constant
function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝐵})):(𝐴 × {𝐵})–1-1-onto→𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | 2ndconst 6387 |
The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd
function to a converse
constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ↾ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)):({𝐴} × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dfmpo 6388* |
Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 6023 (although it
requires that 𝐶 be a set). (Contributed by NM,
19-Dec-2008.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∪
𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝐶〉} |
| |
| Theorem | cnvf1olem 6389 |
Lemma for cnvf1o 6390. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
27-Apr-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ◡{𝐶})) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvf1o 6390* |
Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse
bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}):𝐴–1-1-onto→◡𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | f2ndf 6391 |
The 2nd (second component of an ordered
pair) function restricted to a
function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 into
the codomain of 𝐹.
(Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹⟶𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | fo2ndf 6392 |
The 2nd (second component of an ordered
pair) function restricted to
a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 onto
the range of 𝐹.
(Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–onto→ran 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | f1o2ndf1 6393 |
The 2nd (second component of an ordered
pair) function restricted to
a one-to-one function 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from 𝐹 onto
the
range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der
Vekens,
4-Feb-2018.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→ran
𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | algrflem 6394 |
Lemma for algrf and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | algrflemg 6395 |
Lemma for algrf 12619 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro,
28-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xporderlem 6396* |
Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott
Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st
‘𝑦) ∧
(2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑆𝑑)))) |
| |
| Theorem | poxp 6397* |
A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton,
16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.)
|
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st
‘𝑦) ∧
(2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | spc2ed 6398* |
Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit
substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvoprab 6399* |
The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs.
(Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.)
|
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
& ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓
& ⊢ (𝑎 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V ×
V)) ⇒ ⊢ ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑧, 𝑎〉 ∣ 𝜓} |
| |
| Theorem | f1od2 6400* |
Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function of two variables.
(Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐽)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐷) |