| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 64 of 161) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | dmmpoga 6301* | Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6297. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dmmpog 6302* | Domain of an operation given by the maps-to notation, closed form of dmmpo 6297. Caution: This theorem is only valid in the very special case where the value of the mapping is a constant! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → dom 𝐹 = (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexxg 6303* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (version for dependent domains). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexg 6304* | Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by FL, 17-May-2010.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 1-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexga 6305* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | mpoexw 6306* | Weak version of mpoex 6307 that holds without ax-coll 4163. If the domain and codomain of an operation given by maps-to notation are sets, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 14-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V & ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷 ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | mpoex 6307* | If the domain of an operation given by maps-to notation is a set, the operation is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-Dec-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | fnmpoovd 6308* | A function with a Cartesian product as domain is a mapping with two arguments defined by its operation values. (Contributed by AV, 20-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 3-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵)) & ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝑎 ∧ 𝑗 = 𝑏) → 𝐷 = 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑗 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑀 = (𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑖𝑀𝑗) = 𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | fmpoco 6309* | Composition of two functions. Variation of fmptco 5753 when the second function has two arguments. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝑆)) & ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑅 → 𝑆 = 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝑇)) | ||
| Theorem | oprabco 6310* | Composition of a function with an operator abstraction. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 26-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐻‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐻 Fn 𝐷 → 𝐺 = (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | oprab2co 6311* | Composition of operator abstractions. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 23-Apr-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑅) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 〈𝐶, 𝐷〉) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝐶𝑀𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑀 Fn (𝑅 × 𝑆) → 𝐺 = (𝑀 ∘ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | df1st2 6312* | An alternate possible definition of the 1st function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑥} = (1st ↾ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | df2nd2 6313* | An alternate possible definition of the 2nd function. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝑧 = 𝑦} = (2nd ↾ (V × V)) | ||
| Theorem | 1stconst 6314 | The mapping of a restriction of the 1st function to a constant function. (Contributed by NM, 14-Dec-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (1st ↾ (𝐴 × {𝐵})):(𝐴 × {𝐵})–1-1-onto→𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2ndconst 6315 | The mapping of a restriction of the 2nd function to a converse constant function. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (2nd ↾ ({𝐴} × 𝐵)):({𝐴} × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | dfmpo 6316* | Alternate definition for the maps-to notation df-mpo 5956 (although it requires that 𝐶 be a set). (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝐶〉} | ||
| Theorem | cnvf1olem 6317 | Lemma for cnvf1o 6318. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 = ∪ ◡{𝐵})) → (𝐶 ∈ ◡𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 = ∪ ◡{𝐶})) | ||
| Theorem | cnvf1o 6318* | Describe a function that maps the elements of a set to its converse bijectively. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 27-Apr-2014.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}):𝐴–1-1-onto→◡𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | f2ndf 6319 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 into the codomain of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | fo2ndf 6320 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a function 𝐹 is a function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | f1o2ndf1 6321 | The 2nd (second component of an ordered pair) function restricted to a one-to-one function 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from 𝐹 onto the range of 𝐹. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 4-Feb-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → (2nd ↾ 𝐹):𝐹–1-1-onto→ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | algrflem 6322 | Lemma for algrf and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | algrflemg 6323 | Lemma for algrf 12411 and related theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-May-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Jul-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵(𝐹 ∘ 1st )𝐶) = (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | xporderlem 6324* | Lemma for lexicographical ordering theorems. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝑎, 𝑏〉𝑇〈𝑐, 𝑑〉 ↔ (((𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑑 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑎𝑅𝑐 ∨ (𝑎 = 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏𝑆𝑑)))) | ||
| Theorem | poxp 6325* | A lexicographical ordering of two posets. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ∧ ((1st ‘𝑥)𝑅(1st ‘𝑦) ∨ ((1st ‘𝑥) = (1st ‘𝑦) ∧ (2nd ‘𝑥)𝑆(2nd ‘𝑦))))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 Po 𝐵) → 𝑇 Po (𝐴 × 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | spc2ed 6326* | Existential specialization with 2 quantifiers, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒 & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | cnvoprab 6327* | The converse of a class abstraction of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑎 = 〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑)) & ⊢ (𝜓 → 𝑎 ∈ (V × V)) ⇒ ⊢ ◡{〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈𝑧, 𝑎〉 ∣ 𝜓} | ||
| Theorem | f1od2 6328* | Describe an implicit one-to-one onto function of two variables. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-Aug-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐼 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐽 ∈ 𝑌)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐽)))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→𝐷) | ||
| Theorem | disjxp1 6329* | The sets of a cartesian product are disjoint if the sets in the first argument are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → Disj 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵 × 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | disjsnxp 6330* | The sets in the cartesian product of singletons with other sets, are disjoint. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 11-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Disj 𝑗 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑗} × 𝐵) | ||
The following theorems are about maps-to operations (see df-mpo 5956) where the domain of the second argument depends on the domain of the first argument, especially when the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, in short "x-maps-to operations". For labels, the abbreviations "mpox" are used (since "x" usually denotes the first argument). This is in line with the currently used conventions for such cases (see cbvmpox 6030, ovmpox 6081 and fmpox 6293). If the first argument is an ordered pair, as in the following, the abbreviation is extended to "mpoxop", and the maps-to operations are called "x-op maps-to operations" for short. | ||
| Theorem | opeliunxp2f 6331* | Membership in a union of Cartesian products, using bound-variable hypothesis for 𝐸 instead of distinct variable conditions as in opeliunxp2 4822. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐸 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐶 → 𝐵 = 𝐸) ⇒ ⊢ (〈𝐶, 𝐷〉 ∈ ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ({𝑥} × 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopn0yelv 6332* | If there is an element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument, then the second argument is an element of the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopoveq 6333* | Value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) → (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) = {𝑛 ∈ 𝑉 ∣ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | mpoxopovel 6334* | Element of the value of an operation given by a maps-to rule, where the first argument is a pair and the base set of the second argument is the first component of the first argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 10-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ↦ {𝑛 ∈ (1st ‘𝑥) ∣ 𝜑}) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝑁 ∈ (〈𝑉, 𝑊〉𝐹𝐾) ↔ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ [〈𝑉, 𝑊〉 / 𝑥][𝐾 / 𝑦][𝑁 / 𝑛]𝜑))) | ||
| Theorem | rbropapd 6335* | Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒)))) | ||
| Theorem | rbropap 6336* | Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the condition 𝜓. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {〈𝑓, 𝑝〉 ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)}) & ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒))) | ||
| Syntax | ctpos 6337 | The transposition of a function. |
| class tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Definition | df-tpos 6338* | Define the transposition of a function, which is a function 𝐺 = tpos 𝐹 satisfying 𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦) = 𝐹(𝑦, 𝑥). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tposss 6339 | Subset theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 ⊆ tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposeq 6340 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposeqd 6341 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tposssxp 6342 | The transposition is a subset of a cross product. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jan-2017.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ⊆ ((◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) × ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | reltpos 6343 | The transposition is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Rel tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | brtpos2 6344 | Value of the transposition at a pair 〈𝐴, 𝐵〉. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (◡dom 𝐹 ∪ {∅}) ∧ ∪ ◡{𝐴}𝐹𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | brtpos0 6345 | The behavior of tpos when the left argument is the empty set (which is not an ordered pair but is the "default" value of an ordered pair when the arguments are proper classes). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅tpos 𝐹𝐴 ↔ ∅𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | reldmtpos 6346 | Necessary and sufficient condition for dom tpos 𝐹 to be a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom tpos 𝐹 ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | brtposg 6347 | The transposition swaps arguments of a three-parameter relation. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Jan-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵〉tpos 𝐹𝐶 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴〉𝐹𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | ottposg 6348 | The transposition swaps the first two elements in a collection of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (〈𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶〉 ∈ tpos 𝐹 ↔ 〈𝐵, 𝐴, 𝐶〉 ∈ 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | dmtpos 6349 | The domain of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → dom tpos 𝐹 = ◡dom 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | rntpos 6350 | The range of tpos 𝐹 when dom 𝐹 is a relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → ran tpos 𝐹 = ran 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tposexg 6351 | The transposition of a set is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → tpos 𝐹 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | ovtposg 6352 | The transposition swaps the arguments in a two-argument function. When 𝐹 is a matrix, which is to say a function from ( 1 ... m ) × ( 1 ... n ) to the reals or some ring, tpos 𝐹 is the transposition of 𝐹, which is where the name comes from. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴tpos 𝐹𝐵) = (𝐵𝐹𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfun 6353 | The transposition of a function is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → Fun tpos 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos2 6354* | Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ◡dom 𝐹 ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥}))) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos3 6355* | Alternate definition of tpos when 𝐹 has relational domain. Compare df-cnv 4687. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel dom 𝐹 → tpos 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 〈𝑦, 𝑥〉𝐹𝑧}) | ||
| Theorem | dftpos4 6356* | Alternate definition of tpos. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∘ (𝑥 ∈ ((V × V) ∪ {∅}) ↦ ∪ ◡{𝑥})) | ||
| Theorem | tpostpos 6357 | Value of the double transposition for a general class 𝐹. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos tpos 𝐹 = (𝐹 ∩ (((V × V) ∪ {∅}) × V)) | ||
| Theorem | tpostpos2 6358 | Value of the double transposition for a relation on triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐹 ∧ Rel dom 𝐹) → tpos tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | tposfn2 6359 | The domain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → tpos 𝐹 Fn ◡𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfo2 6360 | Condition for a surjective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf2 6361 | The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴⟶𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf12 6362 | Condition for an injective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposf1o2 6363 | Condition of a bijective transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (Rel 𝐴 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → tpos 𝐹:◡𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | tposfo 6364 | The domain and codomain/range of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–onto→𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)–onto→𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | tposf 6365 | The domain and codomain of a transposition. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 → tpos 𝐹:(𝐵 × 𝐴)⟶𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | tposfn 6366 | Functionality of a transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) → tpos 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | tpos0 6367 | Transposition of the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos ∅ = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | tposco 6368 | Transposition of a composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ tpos (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = (𝐹 ∘ tpos 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | tpossym 6369* | Two ways to say a function is symmetric. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → (tpos 𝐹 = 𝐹 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝐹𝑦) = (𝑦𝐹𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | tposeqi 6370 | Equality theorem for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = 𝐺 ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = tpos 𝐺 | ||
| Theorem | tposex 6371 | A transposition is a set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 ∈ V | ||
| Theorem | nftpos 6372 | Hypothesis builder for transposition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥tpos 𝐹 | ||
| Theorem | tposoprab 6373* | Transposition of a class of ordered triples. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑥, 𝑦〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = {〈〈𝑦, 𝑥〉, 𝑧〉 ∣ 𝜑} | ||
| Theorem | tposmpo 6374* | Transposition of a two-argument mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ tpos 𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | pwuninel2 6375 | The power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | 2pwuninelg 6376 | The power set of the power set of the union of a set does not belong to the set. This theorem provides a way of constructing a new set that doesn't belong to a given set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | iunon 6377* | The indexed union of a set of ordinal numbers 𝐵(𝑥) is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ On) | ||
| Syntax | wsmo 6378 | Introduce the strictly monotone ordinal function. A strictly monotone function is one that is constantly increasing across the ordinals. |
| wff Smo 𝐴 | ||
| Definition | df-smo 6379* | Definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. Definition 7.46 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Smo 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴:dom 𝐴⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐴(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦)))) | ||
| Theorem | dfsmo2 6380* | Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (Smo 𝐹 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶On ∧ Ord dom 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | issmo 6381* | Conditions for which 𝐴 is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 15-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴:𝐵⟶On & ⊢ Ord 𝐵 & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 → (𝐴‘𝑥) ∈ (𝐴‘𝑦))) & ⊢ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ Smo 𝐴 | ||
| Theorem | issmo2 6382* | Alternate definition of a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 → ((𝐵 ⊆ On ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝐹‘𝑦) ∈ (𝐹‘𝑥)) → Smo 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | smoeq 6383 | Equality theorem for strictly monotone functions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (Smo 𝐴 ↔ Smo 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | smodm 6384 | The domain of a strictly monotone function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ (Smo 𝐴 → Ord dom 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | smores 6385 | A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 5-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐴) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | smores3 6386 | A strictly monotone function restricted to an ordinal remains strictly monotone. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 19-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (dom 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐵) → Smo (𝐴 ↾ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | smores2 6387 | A strictly monotone ordinal function restricted to an ordinal is still monotone. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ Ord 𝐴) → Smo (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | smodm2 6388 | The domain of a strictly monotone ordinal function is an ordinal. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) → Ord 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | smofvon2dm 6389 | The function values of a strictly monotone ordinal function are ordinals. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐹 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹‘𝐵) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | iordsmo 6390 | The identity relation restricted to the ordinals is a strictly monotone function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 16-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ Ord 𝐴 ⇒ ⊢ Smo ( I ↾ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | smo0 6391 | The null set is a strictly monotone ordinal function. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ Smo ∅ | ||
| Theorem | smofvon 6392 | If 𝐵 is a strictly monotone ordinal function, and 𝐴 is in the domain of 𝐵, then the value of the function at 𝐴 is an ordinal. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 20-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → (𝐵‘𝐴) ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | smoel 6393 | If 𝑥 is less than 𝑦 then a strictly monotone function's value will be strictly less at 𝑥 than at 𝑦. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐵‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐵‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | smoiun 6394* | The value of a strictly monotone ordinal function contains its indexed union. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 22-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((Smo 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐵) → ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐵‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐵‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | smoiso 6395 | If 𝐹 is an isomorphism from an ordinal 𝐴 onto 𝐵, which is a subset of the ordinals, then 𝐹 is a strictly monotonic function. Exercise 3 in [TakeutiZaring] p. 50. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 24-Nov-2011.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom E , E (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ On) → Smo 𝐹) | ||
| Theorem | smoel2 6396 | A strictly monotone ordinal function preserves the epsilon relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2013.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ Smo 𝐹) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝐹‘𝐶) ∈ (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Syntax | crecs 6397 | Notation for a function defined by strong transfinite recursion. |
| class recs(𝐹) | ||
| Definition | df-recs 6398* |
Define a function recs(𝐹) on On, the
class of ordinal
numbers, by transfinite recursion given a rule 𝐹 which sets the next
value given all values so far. See df-irdg 6463 for more details on why
this definition is desirable. Unlike df-irdg 6463 which restricts the
update rule to use only the previous value, this version allows the
update rule to use all previous values, which is why it is
described
as "strong", although it is actually more primitive. See tfri1d 6428 and
tfri2d 6429 for the primary contract of this definition.
(Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ recs(𝐹) = ∪ {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝑓 Fn 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘(𝑓 ↾ 𝑦)))} | ||
| Theorem | recseq 6399 | Equality theorem for recs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → recs(𝐹) = recs(𝐺)) | ||
| Theorem | nfrecs 6400 | Bound-variable hypothesis builder for recs. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹 ⇒ ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥recs(𝐹) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |