Theorem zfpair2 4092

Description: Derive the abbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing from ax-pr 4091. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfpair2	⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Proof of Theorem zfpair2

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-pr 4091	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
2	1	bm1.3ii 4009	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
3		dfcleq 2109	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
4		vex 2660	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
5	4	elpr 3514	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6	5	bibi2i 226	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7	6	albii 1429	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
8	3, 7	bitri 183	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
9	8	exbii 1567	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
10	2, 9	mpbir 145	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
11	10	issetri 2666	1 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 104   ∨ wo 680  ∀wal 1312   = wceq 1314  ∃wex 1451   ∈ wcel 1463  Vcvv 2657  {cpr 3494

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-io 681  ax-5 1406  ax-7 1407  ax-gen 1408  ax-ie1 1452  ax-ie2 1453  ax-8 1465  ax-10 1466  ax-11 1467  ax-i12 1468  ax-bndl 1469  ax-4 1470  ax-14 1475  ax-17 1489  ax-i9 1493  ax-ial 1497  ax-i5r 1498  ax-ext 2097  ax-sep 4006  ax-pr 4091

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-tru 1317  df-nf 1420  df-sb 1719  df-clab 2102  df-cleq 2108  df-clel 2111  df-nfc 2244  df-v 2659  df-un 3041  df-sn 3499  df-pr 3500

This theorem is referenced by:  prexg  4093  onintexmid  4447  funopg  5115