Theorem zfpair2 4028

Description: Derive the abbreviated version of the Axiom of Pairing from ax-pr 4027. (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zfpair2	⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Proof of Theorem zfpair2

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑤 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-pr 4027	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤((𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦) → 𝑤 ∈ 𝑧)
2	1	bm1.3ii 3952	. . 3 ⊢ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
3		dfcleq 2082	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}))
4		vex 2622	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑤 ∈ V
5	4	elpr 3462	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦))
6	5	bibi2i 225	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ (𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
7	6	albii 1404	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ {𝑥, 𝑦}) ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
8	3, 7	bitri 182	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
9	8	exbii 1541	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦} ↔ ∃𝑧∀𝑤(𝑤 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ (𝑤 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑤 = 𝑦)))
10	2, 9	mpbir 144	. 2 ⊢ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = {𝑥, 𝑦}
11	10	issetri 2628	1 ⊢ {𝑥, 𝑦} ∈ V

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 103   ∨ wo 664  ∀wal 1287   = wceq 1289  ∃wex 1426   ∈ wcel 1438  Vcvv 2619  {cpr 3442

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 104  ax-ia2 105  ax-ia3 106  ax-io 665  ax-5 1381  ax-7 1382  ax-gen 1383  ax-ie1 1427  ax-ie2 1428  ax-8 1440  ax-10 1441  ax-11 1442  ax-i12 1443  ax-bndl 1444  ax-4 1445  ax-14 1450  ax-17 1464  ax-i9 1468  ax-ial 1472  ax-i5r 1473  ax-ext 2070  ax-sep 3949  ax-pr 4027

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 115  df-tru 1292  df-nf 1395  df-sb 1693  df-clab 2075  df-cleq 2081  df-clel 2084  df-nfc 2217  df-v 2621  df-un 3001  df-sn 3447  df-pr 3448

This theorem is referenced by:  prexg  4029  onintexmid  4378  funopg  5034