Theorem onintexmid 4573

Description: If the intersection (infimum) of an inhabited class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class, excluded middle follows. The hypothesis would be provable given excluded middle. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
onintexmid.onint	⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onintexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem onintexmid

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prssi 3751	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → {𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On)
2		prmg 3714	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
4		zfpair2 4211	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ V
5		sseq1 3179	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (𝑦 ⊆ On ↔ {𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On))
6		eleq2 2241	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
7	6	exbidv 1825	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
8	5, 7	anbi12d 473	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})))
9		inteq 3848	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → ∩ 𝑦 = ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣})
10		id 19	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → 𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣})
11	9, 10	eleq12d 2248	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
12	8, 11	imbi12d 234	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})))
13		onintexmid.onint	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)
14	4, 12, 13	vtocl 2792	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
15	1, 3, 14	syl2anc 411	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
16		elpri 3616	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣))
17	15, 16	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣))
18		incom 3328	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
19	18	eqeq1i 2185	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑢)
20		dfss1 3340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = 𝑢)
21		vex 2741	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
22		vex 2741	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
23	21, 22	intpr 3877	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
24	23	eqeq1i 2185	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑢)
25	19, 20, 24	3bitr4ri 213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ↔ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣)
26	23	eqeq1i 2185	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑣)
27		dfss1 3340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑣)
28	26, 27	bitr4i 187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢)
29	25, 28	orbi12i 764	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣) ↔ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
30	17, 29	sylib 122	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
31	30	rgen2a 2531	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ On ∀𝑣 ∈ On (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢)
32	31	ordtri2or2exmid 4571	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 708   = wceq 1353  ∃wex 1492   ∈ wcel 2148   ∩ cin 3129   ⊆ wss 3130  {cpr 3594  ∩ cint 3845  Oncon0 4364

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709  ax-5 1447  ax-7 1448  ax-gen 1449  ax-ie1 1493  ax-ie2 1494  ax-8 1504  ax-10 1505  ax-11 1506  ax-i12 1507  ax-bndl 1509  ax-4 1510  ax-17 1526  ax-i9 1530  ax-ial 1534  ax-i5r 1535  ax-13 2150  ax-14 2151  ax-ext 2159  ax-sep 4122  ax-nul 4130  ax-pow 4175  ax-pr 4210  ax-un 4434  ax-setind 4537

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 980  df-tru 1356  df-nf 1461  df-sb 1763  df-clab 2164  df-cleq 2170  df-clel 2173  df-nfc 2308  df-ne 2348  df-ral 2460  df-rex 2461  df-rab 2464  df-v 2740  df-dif 3132  df-un 3134  df-in 3136  df-ss 3143  df-nul 3424  df-pw 3578  df-sn 3599  df-pr 3600  df-uni 3811  df-int 3846  df-tr 4103  df-iord 4367  df-on 4369  df-suc 4372

This theorem is referenced by: (None)