Theorem onintexmid 4669

Description: If the intersection (infimum) of an inhabited class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class, excluded middle follows. The hypothesis would be provable given excluded middle. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
onintexmid.onint	⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onintexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem onintexmid

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prssi 3829	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → {𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On)
2		prmg 3792	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
4		zfpair2 4298	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ V
5		sseq1 3248	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (𝑦 ⊆ On ↔ {𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On))
6		eleq2 2293	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
7	6	exbidv 1871	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
8	5, 7	anbi12d 473	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})))
9		inteq 3929	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → ∩ 𝑦 = ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣})
10		id 19	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → 𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣})
11	9, 10	eleq12d 2300	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
12	8, 11	imbi12d 234	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})))
13		onintexmid.onint	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)
14	4, 12, 13	vtocl 2856	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
15	1, 3, 14	syl2anc 411	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
16		elpri 3690	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣))
17	15, 16	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣))
18		incom 3397	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
19	18	eqeq1i 2237	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑢)
20		dfss1 3409	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = 𝑢)
21		vex 2803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
22		vex 2803	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
23	21, 22	intpr 3958	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
24	23	eqeq1i 2237	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑢)
25	19, 20, 24	3bitr4ri 213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ↔ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣)
26	23	eqeq1i 2237	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑣)
27		dfss1 3409	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑣)
28	26, 27	bitr4i 187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢)
29	25, 28	orbi12i 769	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣) ↔ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
30	17, 29	sylib 122	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
31	30	rgen2a 2584	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ On ∀𝑣 ∈ On (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢)
32	31	ordtri2or2exmid 4667	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 713   = wceq 1395  ∃wex 1538   ∈ wcel 2200   ∩ cin 3197   ⊆ wss 3198  {cpr 3668  ∩ cint 3926  Oncon0 4458

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4205  ax-nul 4213  ax-pow 4262  ax-pr 4297  ax-un 4528  ax-setind 4633

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-rab 2517  df-v 2802  df-dif 3200  df-un 3202  df-in 3204  df-ss 3211  df-nul 3493  df-pw 3652  df-sn 3673  df-pr 3674  df-uni 3892  df-int 3927  df-tr 4186  df-iord 4461  df-on 4463  df-suc 4466

This theorem is referenced by: (None)