Theorem onintexmid 4671

Description: If the intersection (infimum) of an inhabited class of ordinal numbers belongs to the class, excluded middle follows. The hypothesis would be provable given excluded middle. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 29-Aug-2021.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
onintexmid.onint	⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
onintexmid	⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem onintexmid

Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		prssi 3831	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → {𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On)
2		prmg 3794	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑢 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
3	2	adantr 276	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
4		zfpair2 4300	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ V
5		sseq1 3250	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (𝑦 ⊆ On ↔ {𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On))
6		eleq2 2295	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
7	6	exbidv 1873	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
8	5, 7	anbi12d 473	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ ({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})))
9		inteq 3931	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → ∩ 𝑦 = ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣})
10		id 19	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → 𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣})
11	9, 10	eleq12d 2302	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}))
12	8, 11	imbi12d 234	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = {𝑢, 𝑣} → (((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦) ↔ (({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})))
13		onintexmid.onint	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∩ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑦)
14	4, 12, 13	vtocl 2858	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (({𝑢, 𝑣} ⊆ On ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣}) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
15	1, 3, 14	syl2anc 411	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣})
16		elpri 3692	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} ∈ {𝑢, 𝑣} → (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣))
17	15, 16	syl 14	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣))
18		incom 3399	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
19	18	eqeq1i 2239	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑢)
20		dfss1 3411	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ↔ (𝑣 ∩ 𝑢) = 𝑢)
21		vex 2805	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑢 ∈ V
22		vex 2805	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑣 ∈ V
23	21, 22	intpr 3960	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣)
24	23	eqeq1i 2239	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑢)
25	19, 20, 24	3bitr4ri 213	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ↔ 𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣)
26	23	eqeq1i 2239	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑣)
27		dfss1 3411	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢 ↔ (𝑢 ∩ 𝑣) = 𝑣)
28	26, 27	bitr4i 187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣 ↔ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢)
29	25, 28	orbi12i 771	. . . 4 ⊢ ((∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑢 ∨ ∩ {𝑢, 𝑣} = 𝑣) ↔ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
30	17, 29	sylib 122	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑢 ∈ On ∧ 𝑣 ∈ On) → (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢))
31	30	rgen2a 2586	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑢 ∈ On ∀𝑣 ∈ On (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∨ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝑢)
32	31	ordtri2or2exmid 4669	1 ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ∨ wo 715   = wceq 1397  ∃wex 1540   ∈ wcel 2202   ∩ cin 3199   ⊆ wss 3200  {cpr 3670  ∩ cint 3928  Oncon0 4460

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4207  ax-nul 4215  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-uni 3894  df-int 3929  df-tr 4188  df-iord 4463  df-on 4465  df-suc 4468

This theorem is referenced by: (None)