Theorem bj-opelidb 37824

Description: Characterization of the ordered pair elements of the identity relation.

Remark: in deduction-style proofs, one could save a few syntactic steps by using another antecedent than ⊤ which already appears in the proof. Here for instance this could be the definition I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦} but this would make the proof less easy to read. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-opelidb	⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-opelidb

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-id 5555	. . . 4 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
2	1	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (⊤ → I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦})
3		eqeq12 2779	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
4	3	adantl 486	. . 3 ⊢ ((⊤ ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
5	2, 4	opelopabbv 37815	. 2 ⊢ (⊤ → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
6	5	mptru 1576	1 ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ I ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569  ⊤wtru 1570   ∈ wcel 2142  Vcvv 3454  ⟨cop 4594  {copab 5172   I cid 5554

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-pr 5403

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-opab 5173  df-id 5555

This theorem is used by:  bj-opelidb1  37825  bj-opelid  37828