Theorem brae 33239

Description: 'almost everywhere' relation for a measure and a measurable set 𝐴. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2017.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
brae	⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑀) → (𝐴a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ 𝐴)) = 0))

Proof of Theorem brae

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simpr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
2	1	dmeqd 5906	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = dom 𝑀)
3	2	unieqd 4923	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = ∪ dom 𝑀)
4		simpl 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑎 = 𝐴)
5	3, 4	difeq12d 4124	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎) = (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ 𝐴))
6	1, 5	fveq12d 6899	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ 𝐴)))
7	6	eqeq1d 2735	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ((𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = 0 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ 𝐴)) = 0))
8		df-ae 33237	. . 3 ⊢ a.e. = {⟨𝑎, 𝑚⟩ ∣ (𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = 0}
9	7, 8	brabga 5535	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures) → (𝐴a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ 𝐴)) = 0))
10	9	ancoms 460	1 ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑀) → (𝐴a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ 𝐴)) = 0))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107   ∖ cdif 3946  ∪ cuni 4909   class class class wbr 5149  dom cdm 5677  ran crn 5678  ‘cfv 6544  0cc0 11110  measurescmeas 33193  a.e.cae 33235

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pr 5428

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-dm 5687  df-iota 6496  df-fv 6552  df-ae 33237

This theorem is referenced by: (None)