Theorem braew 34221

Description: 'almost everywhere' relation for a measure 𝑀 and a property 𝜑 (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Oct-2017.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
braew.1	⊢ ∪ dom 𝑀 = 𝑂

Assertion

Ref	Expression
braew	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = 0))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑂

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝑀(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem braew

Dummy variables 𝑚 𝑎 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		braew.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∪ dom 𝑀 = 𝑂
2		dmexg 7919	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → dom 𝑀 ∈ V)
3	2	uniexd 7758	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ∪ dom 𝑀 ∈ V)
4	1, 3	eqeltrrid 2845	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → 𝑂 ∈ V)
5		rabexg 5335	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ V → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
6	4, 5	syl 17	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V)
7		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑚 = 𝑀)
8	7	dmeqd 5914	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → dom 𝑚 = dom 𝑀)
9	8	unieqd 4918	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ∪ dom 𝑚 = ∪ dom 𝑀)
10		simpl 482	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → 𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})
11	9, 10	difeq12d 4126	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎) = (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}))
12	7, 11	fveq12d 6911	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → (𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})))
13	12	eqeq1d 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ 𝑚 = 𝑀) → ((𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = 0 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0))
14		df-ae 34218	. . . 4 ⊢ a.e. = {⟨𝑎, 𝑚⟩ ∣ (𝑚‘(∪ dom 𝑚 ∖ 𝑎)) = 0}
15	13, 14	brabga 5537	. . 3 ⊢ (({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑} ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures) → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0))
16	6, 15	mpancom 688	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0))
17	1	difeq1i 4121	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}) = (𝑂 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})
18		notrab 4321	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑂 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
19	17, 18	eqtri 2764	. . . 4 ⊢ (∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}) = {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}
20	19	fveq2i 6907	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑})
21	20	eqeq1i 2741	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑀‘(∪ dom 𝑀 ∖ {𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑})) = 0 ↔ (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = 0)
22	16, 21	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ ∪ ran measures → ({𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ 𝜑}a.e.𝑀 ↔ (𝑀‘{𝑥 ∈ 𝑂 ∣ ¬ 𝜑}) = 0))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  {crab 3435  Vcvv 3479   ∖ cdif 3947  ∪ cuni 4905   class class class wbr 5141  dom cdm 5683  ran crn 5684  ‘cfv 6559  0cc0 11151  measurescmeas 34174  a.e.cae 34216

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5294  ax-nul 5304  ax-pr 5430  ax-un 7751

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2815  df-rab 3436  df-v 3481  df-dif 3953  df-un 3955  df-in 3957  df-ss 3967  df-nul 4333  df-if 4525  df-pw 4600  df-sn 4625  df-pr 4627  df-op 4631  df-uni 4906  df-br 5142  df-opab 5204  df-cnv 5691  df-dm 5693  df-rn 5694  df-iota 6512  df-fv 6567  df-ae 34218

This theorem is referenced by:  truae  34222  aean  34223