Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  eqopab2b Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem eqopab2b 5416
 Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2391. Use the weaker eqopab2bw 5412 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
eqopab2b ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓))

Proof of Theorem eqopab2b
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssopab2b 5413 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓))
2 ssopab2b 5413 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜓𝜑))
31, 2anbi12i 629 . 2 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜓𝜑)))
4 eqss 3957 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
5 2albiim 1891 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜓𝜑)))
63, 4, 53bitr4i 306 1 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536   = wceq 1538   ⊆ wss 3908  {copab 5104 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2178  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2794  ax-sep 5179  ax-nul 5186  ax-pr 5307 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2653  df-clab 2801  df-cleq 2815  df-clel 2894  df-nfc 2962  df-ral 3135  df-v 3471  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4266  df-if 4440  df-sn 4540  df-pr 4542  df-op 4546  df-opab 5105 This theorem is referenced by:  opabbi  35561
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator