Theorem eqopab2b 5498

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2374. Use the weaker eqopab2bw 5494 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqopab2b	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem eqopab2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssopab2b 5495	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
2		ssopab2b 5495	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12i 628	. 2 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)))
4		eqss 3947	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
5		2albiim 1891	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1539   = wceq 1541   ⊆ wss 3899  {copab 5158

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-10 2146  ax-11 2162  ax-12 2182  ax-13 2374  ax-ext 2706  ax-sep 5239  ax-nul 5249  ax-pr 5375

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2537  df-eu 2567  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2883  df-ral 3050  df-rab 3398  df-v 3440  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-sn 4579  df-pr 4581  df-op 4585  df-opab 5159

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbi  38305