Theorem eqopab2b 5404

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2379. Use the weaker eqopab2bw 5400 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqopab2b	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem eqopab2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssopab2b 5401	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
2		ssopab2b 5401	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12i 629	. 2 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)))
4		eqss 3930	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
5		2albiim 1891	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 399  ∀wal 1536   = wceq 1538   ⊆ wss 3881  {copab 5092

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2175  ax-13 2379  ax-ext 2770  ax-sep 5167  ax-nul 5174  ax-pr 5295

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-tru 1541  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2598  df-eu 2629  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-nfc 2938  df-ral 3111  df-v 3443  df-dif 3884  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-nul 4244  df-if 4426  df-sn 4526  df-pr 4528  df-op 4532  df-opab 5093

This theorem is referenced by:  opabbi  35603