Theorem eqopab2b 5530

Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404. Use the weaker eqopab2bw 5526 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eqopab2b	⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem eqopab2b

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ssopab2b 5527	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
2		ssopab2b 5527	. . 3 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑))
3	1, 2	anbi12i 640	. 2 ⊢ (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)))
4		eqss 3927	. 2 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
5		2albiim 1924	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 → 𝜑)))
6	3, 4, 5	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569   ⊆ wss 3899  {copab 5169

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-13 2404  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5394

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ral 3080  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-ss 3900  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-opab 5170

This theorem is used by:  opabbi  39237