Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next > Nearby theorems Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  eqopab2bw Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem eqopab2bw 5406
 Description: Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Version of eqopab2b 5410 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
eqopab2bw ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓))
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦
Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem eqopab2bw
StepHypRef Expression
1 ssopab2bw 5405 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓))
2 ssopab2bw 5405 . . 3 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜓𝜑))
31, 2anbi12i 630 . 2 (({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}) ↔ (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜓𝜑)))
4 eqss 3908 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ∧ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}))
5 2albiim 1892 . 2 (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜓𝜑)))
63, 4, 53bitr4i 307 1 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥𝑦(𝜑𝜓))
 Colors of variables: wff setvar class Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1537   = wceq 1539   ⊆ wss 3859  {copab 5095 This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2016  ax-8 2114  ax-9 2122  ax-10 2143  ax-11 2159  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2730  ax-sep 5170  ax-nul 5177  ax-pr 5299 This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 846  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2071  df-mo 2558  df-eu 2589  df-clab 2737  df-cleq 2751  df-clel 2831  df-nfc 2902  df-ral 3076  df-v 3412  df-dif 3862  df-un 3864  df-in 3866  df-ss 3876  df-nul 4227  df-if 4422  df-sn 4524  df-pr 4526  df-op 4530  df-opab 5096 This theorem is referenced by:  mptbi12f  35877  relexp0eq  40768
 Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator