MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  opabn0 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem opabn0 5509
Description: Nonempty ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
opabn0 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)

Proof of Theorem opabn0
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 n0 4307 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
2 elopab 5483 . . . 4 (𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
32exbii 1850 . . 3 (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑧𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4 exrot3 2171 . . . 4 (∃𝑧𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5 opex 5419 . . . . . . 7 𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
65isseti 3460 . . . . . 6 𝑧 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦
7 19.41v 1951 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑧 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
86, 7mpbiran 710 . . . . 5 (∃𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)
982exbii 1851 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
104, 9bitri 275 . . 3 (∃𝑧𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
113, 10bitri 275 . 2 (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
121, 11bitri 275 1 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wb 206  wa 395   = wceq 1542  wex 1781  wcel 2114  wne 2933  c0 4287  cop 4588  {copab 5162
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-11 2163  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5243  ax-pr 5379
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-ne 2934  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-opab 5163
This theorem is referenced by:  opab0  5510  csbopab  5511  dvdsrval  20309  thlle  21664  bcthlem5  25296  lgsquadlem3  27361  disjecxrn  38663  br1cosscnvxrn  38815
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator