MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  opabn0 Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem opabn0 5491
Description: Nonempty ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2007.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
opabn0 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)

Proof of Theorem opabn0
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 n0 4300 . 2 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑})
2 elopab 5465 . . . 4 (𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
32exbii 1849 . . 3 (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑧𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
4 exrot3 2168 . . . 4 (∃𝑧𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
5 opex 5402 . . . . . . 7 𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ V
65isseti 3454 . . . . . 6 𝑧 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦
7 19.41v 1950 . . . . . 6 (∃𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (∃𝑧 𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
86, 7mpbiran 709 . . . . 5 (∃𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜑)
982exbii 1850 . . . 4 (∃𝑥𝑦𝑧(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
104, 9bitri 275 . . 3 (∃𝑧𝑥𝑦(𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
113, 10bitri 275 . 2 (∃𝑧 𝑧 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
121, 11bitri 275 1 ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥𝑦𝜑)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wb 206  wa 395   = wceq 1541  wex 1780  wcel 2111  wne 2928  c0 4280  cop 4579  {copab 5151
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-11 2160  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5232  ax-nul 5242  ax-pr 5368
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2806  df-ne 2929  df-v 3438  df-dif 3900  df-un 3902  df-ss 3914  df-nul 4281  df-if 4473  df-sn 4574  df-pr 4576  df-op 4580  df-opab 5152
This theorem is referenced by:  opab0  5492  csbopab  5493  dvdsrval  20279  thlle  21634  bcthlem5  25255  lgsquadlem3  27320  disjecxrn  38429  br1cosscnvxrn  38519
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator