Theorem frege100 39097

Description: One direction of dffrege99 39096. Proposition 100 of [Frege1879] p. 72. (Contributed by RP, 7-Jul-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
frege99.z	⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈

Assertion

Ref	Expression
frege100	⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋))

Proof of Theorem frege100

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		frege99.z	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑈
2	1	dffrege99 39096	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍)
3		frege57aid 39006	. 2 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍) → (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋)))
4	2, 3	ax-mp 5	1 ⊢ (𝑋((t+‘𝑅) ∪ I )𝑍 → (¬ 𝑋(t+‘𝑅)𝑍 → 𝑍 = 𝑋))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   = wceq 1658   ∈ wcel 2166   ∪ cun 3796   class class class wbr 4873   I cid 5249  ‘cfv 6123  t+ctcl 14103

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1896  ax-4 1910  ax-5 2011  ax-6 2077  ax-7 2114  ax-9 2175  ax-10 2194  ax-11 2209  ax-12 2222  ax-13 2391  ax-ext 2803  ax-sep 5005  ax-nul 5013  ax-pr 5127  ax-frege1 38924  ax-frege2 38925  ax-frege8 38943  ax-frege52a 38991

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 387  df-or 881  df-ifp 1092  df-3an 1115  df-tru 1662  df-fal 1672  df-ex 1881  df-nf 1885  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2605  df-eu 2640  df-clab 2812  df-cleq 2818  df-clel 2821  df-nfc 2958  df-ral 3122  df-rex 3123  df-rab 3126  df-v 3416  df-dif 3801  df-un 3803  df-in 3805  df-ss 3812  df-nul 4145  df-if 4307  df-sn 4398  df-pr 4400  df-op 4404  df-br 4874  df-opab 4936  df-id 5250  df-xp 5348  df-rel 5349

This theorem is referenced by:  frege101  39098  frege103  39100