| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 435 of 506) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31236) |
(31237-32759) |
(32760-50572) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | istopclsd 43401* | A closure function which satisfies sscls 23192, clsidm 23203, cls0 23216, and clsun 36805 defines a (unique) topology which it is the closure function on. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∪ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ∪ (𝐹‘𝑦))) & ⊢ 𝐽 = {𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ (𝐹‘(𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)) = (𝐵 ∖ 𝑧)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐽 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐵) ∧ (cls‘𝐽) = 𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | ismrc 43402* | A function is a Moore closure operator iff it satisfies mrcssid 17672, mrcss 17671, and mrcidm 17674. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mrCls “ (Moore‘𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝐵⟶𝒫 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → (𝑥 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐹‘(𝐹‘𝑥)) = (𝐹‘𝑥))))) | ||
| Syntax | cnacs 43403 | Class of Noetherian closure systems. |
| class NoeACS | ||
| Definition | df-nacs 43404* | Define a closure system of Noetherian type (not standard terminology) as an algebraic system where all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ NoeACS = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (ACS‘𝑥) ∣ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑐 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑥 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = ((mrCls‘𝑐)‘𝑔)}) | ||
| Theorem | isnacs 43405* | Expand definition of Noetherian-type closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
| Theorem | nacsfg 43406* | In a Noetherian-type closure system, all closed sets are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) | ||
| Theorem | isnacs2 43407 | Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mrefg2 43408* | Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
| Theorem | mrefg3 43409* | Slight variation on finite generation for closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐶) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑆 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑆 ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑔))) | ||
| Theorem | nacsacs 43410 | A closure system of Noetherian type is algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | isnacs3 43411* | A choice-free order equivalent to the Noetherian condition on a closure system. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝑠))) | ||
| Theorem | incssnn0 43412* | Transitivity induction of subsets, lemma for nacsfix 43413. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1)) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | nacsfix 43413* | An increasing sequence of closed sets in a Noetherian-type closure system eventually fixates. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝐹:ℕ0⟶𝐶 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 (𝐹‘𝑥) ⊆ (𝐹‘(𝑥 + 1))) → ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑦)(𝐹‘𝑧) = (𝐹‘𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | constmap 43414 |
A constant (represented without dummy variables) is an element of a
function set.
Note: In the following development, we will be quite often quantifying over functions and points in N-dimensional space (which are equivalent to functions from an "index set"). Many of the following theorems exist to transfer standard facts about functions to elements of function sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Aug-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | mapco2g 43415 | Renaming indices in a tuple, with sethood as antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐸 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mapco2 43416 | Post-composition (renaming indices) of a mapping viewed as a point. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐶) ∧ 𝐷:𝐸⟶𝐶) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐷) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons 43417 | Extending a one-based mapping by adding a tuple at the end results in another mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉}) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons1 43418 | Recover prefix mapping from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) → ((𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉}) ↾ (1...𝑁)) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons1cl 43419 | A nonempty mapping has a prefix. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑀)) → (𝐴 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁))) | ||
| Theorem | mapfzcons2 43420 | Recover added element from an extended mapping. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∪ {〈𝑀, 𝐶〉})‘𝑀) = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | mptfcl 43421* | Interpret range of a maps-to notation as a constraint on the definition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵):𝐴⟶𝐶 → (𝑡 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Syntax | cmzpcl 43422 | Extend class notation to include pre-polynomial rings. |
| class mzPolyCld | ||
| Syntax | cmzp 43423 | Extend class notation to include polynomial rings. |
| class mzPoly | ||
| Definition | df-mzpcl 43424* | Define the polynomially closed function rings over an arbitrary index set 𝑣. The set (mzPolyCld‘𝑣) contains all sets of functions from (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) to ℤ which include all constants and projections and are closed under addition and multiplication. This is a "temporary" set used to define the polynomial function ring itself (mzPoly‘𝑣); see df-mzp 43425. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ mzPolyCld = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑣)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑣) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑣 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑣) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))}) | ||
| Definition | df-mzp 43425 | Polynomials over ℤ with an arbitrary index set, that is, the smallest ring of functions containing all constant functions and all projections. This is almost the most general reasonable definition; to reach full generality, we would need to be able to replace ZZ with an arbitrary (semi)ring (and a coordinate subring), but rings have not been defined yet. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ mzPoly = (𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑣)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpclval 43426* | Substitution lemma for mzPolyCld. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∣ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑝) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑝 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑝 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑝))}) | ||
| Theorem | elmzpcl 43427* | Double substitution lemma for mzPolyCld. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ↔ (𝑃 ⊆ (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∧ ((∀𝑖 ∈ ℤ ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑖}) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑗 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑥‘𝑗)) ∈ 𝑃) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑔 ∈ 𝑃 ((𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) ∈ 𝑃))))) | ||
| Theorem | mzpclall 43428 | The set of all functions with the signature of a polynomial is a polynomially closed set. This is a lemma to show that the intersection in df-mzp 43425 is well-defined. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (ℤ ↑m (ℤ ↑m 𝑉)) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcln0 43429 | Corollary of mzpclall 43428: polynomially closed function sets are not empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcl1 43430 | Defining property 1 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all constant functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐹}) ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcl2 43431* | Defining property 2 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it contains all projections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝐹)) ∈ 𝑃) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcl34 43432 | Defining properties 3 and 4 of a polynomially closed function set 𝑃: it is closed under pointwise addition and multiplication. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑃 ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘f + 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐹 ∘f · 𝐺) ∈ 𝑃)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpval 43433 | Value of the mzPoly function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) = ∩ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | dmmzp 43434 | mzPoly is defined for all index sets which are sets. This is used with elfvdm 6915 to eliminate sethood antecedents. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ dom mzPoly = V | ||
| Theorem | mzpincl 43435 | Polynomial closedness is a universal first-order property and passes to intersections. This is where the closure properties of the polynomial ring itself are proved. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ V → (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∈ (mzPolyCld‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpconst 43436 | Constant functions are polynomial. See also mzpconstmpt 43441. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝐶}) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpf 43437 | A polynomial function is a function from the coordinate space to the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → 𝐹:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | mzpproj 43438* | A projection function is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑋)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpadd 43439 | The pointwise sum of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpaddmpt 43442. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f + 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpmul 43440 | The pointwise product of two polynomial functions is a polynomial function. See also mzpmulmpt 43443. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝐴 ∘f · 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpconstmpt 43441* | A constant function expressed in maps-to notation is polynomial. This theorem and the several that follow (mzpaddmpt 43442, mzpmulmpt 43443, mzpnegmpt 43445, mzpsubmpt 43444, mzpexpmpt 43446) can be used to build proofs that functions which are "manifestly polynomial", in the sense of being a maps-to containing constants, projections, and simple arithmetic operations, are actually polynomial functions. There is no mzpprojmpt because mzpproj 43438 is already expressed using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐶) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpaddmpt 43442* | Sum of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpadd 43439. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 + 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpmulmpt 43443* | Product of polynomial functions is polynomial. Maps-to version of mzpmulmpt 43443. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 · 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpsubmpt 43444* | The difference of two polynomial functions is polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴 − 𝐵)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpnegmpt 43445* | Negation of a polynomial function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ -𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpexpmpt 43446* | Raise a polynomial function to a (fixed) exponent. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝐴↑𝐷)) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpindd 43447* | "Structural" induction to prove properties of all polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ ℤ) → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝜃) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜁) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑓:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜏) ∧ (𝑔:(ℤ ↑m 𝑉)⟶ℤ ∧ 𝜂)) → 𝜎) & ⊢ (𝑥 = ((ℤ ↑m 𝑉) × {𝑓}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑔 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑉) ↦ (𝑔‘𝑓)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑓 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑔 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f + 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜁)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑓 ∘f · 𝑔) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜎)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜌)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → 𝜌) | ||
| Theorem | mzpmfp 43448 | Relationship between multivariate Z-polynomials and general multivariate polynomial functions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Mar-2015.) (Revised by AV, 13-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (mzPoly‘𝐼) = ran (𝐼 eval ℤring) | ||
| Theorem | mzpsubst 43449* | Substituting polynomials for the variables of a polynomial results in a polynomial. 𝐺 is expected to depend on 𝑦 and provide the polynomials which are being substituted. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 𝐺 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐺‘𝑥)))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mzprename 43450* | Simplified version of mzpsubst 43449 to simply relabel variables in a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉) ∧ 𝑅:𝑉⟶𝑊) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ∘ 𝑅))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpresrename 43451* | A polynomial is a polynomial over all larger index sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑉)) → (𝑥 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑊) ↦ (𝐹‘(𝑥 ↾ 𝑉))) ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑊)) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcompact2lem 43452* | Lemma for mzpcompact2 43453. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎))))) | ||
| Theorem | mzpcompact2 43453* | Polynomials are finitary objects and can only reference a finite number of variables, even if the index set is infinite. Thus, every polynomial can be expressed as a (uniquely minimal, although we do not prove that) polynomial on a finite number of variables, which is then extended by adding an arbitrary set of ignored variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝐵) → ∃𝑎 ∈ Fin ∃𝑏 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑎)(𝑎 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 = (𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝐵) ↦ (𝑏‘(𝑐 ↾ 𝑎))))) | ||
| Theorem | coeq0i 43454 | coeq0 6257 but without explicitly introducing domain and range symbols. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴:𝐶⟶𝐷 ∧ 𝐵:𝐸⟶𝐹 ∧ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐹) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∘ 𝐵) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | fzsplit1nn0 43455 | Split a finite 1-based set of integers in the middle, allowing either end to be empty ((1...0)). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵) → (1...𝐵) = ((1...𝐴) ∪ ((𝐴 + 1)...𝐵))) | ||
| Syntax | cdioph 43456 | Extend class notation to include the family of Diophantine sets. |
| class Dioph | ||
| Definition | df-dioph 43457* | A Diophantine set is a set of positive integers which is a projection of the zero set of some polynomial. This definition somewhat awkwardly mixes ℤ (via mzPoly) and ℕ0 (to define the zero sets); the former could be avoided by considering coincidence sets of ℕ0 polynomials at the cost of requiring two, and the second is driven by consistency with our mu-recursive functions and the requirements of the Davis-Putnam-Robinson-Matiyasevich proof. Both are avoidable at a complexity cost. In particular, it is a consequence of 4sq 17023 that implicitly restricting variables to ℕ0 adds no expressive power over allowing them to range over ℤ. While this definition stipulates a specific index set for the polynomials, there is actually flexibility here, see eldioph2b 43464. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ Dioph = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 ↦ ran (𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑛), 𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘)) ↦ {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑛)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)})) | ||
| Theorem | eldiophb 43458* | Initial expression of Diophantine property of a set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐷 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑘 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑘))𝐷 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑘))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)})) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph 43459* | Condition for a set to be Diophantine (unpacking existential quantifier). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝐾))) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾))(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | diophrw 43460* | Renaming and adding unused witness variables does not change the Diophantine set coded by a polynomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 7-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑀:𝑇–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑀 ↾ 𝑂) = ( I ↾ 𝑂)) → {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ ↑m 𝑆) ↦ (𝑃‘(𝑑 ∘ 𝑀)))‘𝑏) = 0)} = {𝑎 ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑇)(𝑎 = (𝑐 ↾ 𝑂) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑐) = 0)}) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph2lem1 43461* | Lemma for eldioph2 43463. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁)∃𝑒 ∈ V (𝑒:(1...𝑑)–1-1-onto→𝐴 ∧ (𝑒 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph2lem2 43462* | Lemma for eldioph2 43463. Construct necessary renaming function for one direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ∧ ((1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑐(𝑐:(1...𝐴)–1-1→𝑆 ∧ (𝑐 ↾ (1...𝑁)) = ( I ↾ (1...𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph2 43463* | Construct a Diophantine set from a polynomial with witness variables drawn from any set whatsoever, via mzpcompact2 43453. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 5-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑆 ∈ V ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph2b 43464* | While Diophantine sets were defined to have a finite number of witness variables consequtively following the observable variables, this is not necessary; they can equivalently be taken to use any witness set (𝑆 ∖ (1...𝑁)). For instance, in diophin 43473 we use this to take the two input sets to have disjoint witness sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin ∧ (1...𝑁) ⊆ 𝑆)) → (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘𝑆)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m 𝑆)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)})) | ||
| Theorem | eldiophelnn0 43465 | Remove antecedent on 𝐵 from Diophantine set constructors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ0) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph3b 43466* | Define Diophantine sets in terms of polynomials with variables indexed by ℕ. This avoids a quantifier over the number of witness variables and will be easier to use than eldiophb 43458 in most cases. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ↔ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)𝐴 = {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑝‘𝑢) = 0)})) | ||
| Theorem | eldioph3 43467* | Inference version of eldioph3b 43466 with quantifier expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (mzPoly‘ℕ)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m ℕ)(𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃‘𝑢) = 0)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | ellz1 43468 | Membership in a lower set of integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ℤ → (𝐴 ∈ (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐵 + 1))) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | lzunuz 43469 | The union of a lower set of integers and an upper set of integers which abut or overlap is all of the integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ≤ (𝐴 + 1)) → ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝐴 + 1))) ∪ (ℤ≥‘𝐵)) = ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | fz1eqin 43470 | Express a one-based finite range as the intersection of lower integers with ℕ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 → (1...𝑁) = ((ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ∩ ℕ)) | ||
| Theorem | lzenom 43471 | Lower integers are countably infinite. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ ℤ → (ℤ ∖ (ℤ≥‘(𝑁 + 1))) ≈ ω) | ||
| Theorem | elmapresaunres2 43472 | fresaunres2 6750 transposed to mappings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝐶 ↑m 𝐵) ∧ (𝐹 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)) = (𝐺 ↾ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))) → ((𝐹 ∪ 𝐺) ↾ 𝐵) = 𝐺) | ||
| Theorem | diophin 43473 | If two sets are Diophantine, so is their intersection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | diophun 43474 | If two sets are Diophantine, so is their union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eldiophss 43475 | Diophantine sets are sets of tuples of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (Dioph‘𝐵) → 𝐴 ⊆ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | diophrex 43476* | Projecting a Diophantine set by removing a coordinate results in a Diophantine set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑡 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑆 𝑡 = (𝑢 ↾ (1...𝑁))} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eq0rabdioph 43477* | This is the first of a number of theorems which allow sets to be proven Diophantine by syntactic induction, and models the correspondence between Diophantine sets and monotone existential first-order logic. This first theorem shows that the zero set of an implicit polynomial is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | eqrabdioph 43478* | Diophantine set builder for equality of polynomial expressions. Note that the two expressions need not be nonnegative; only variables are so constrained. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐵) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 = 𝐵} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 0dioph 43479 | The empty set is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → ∅ ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | vdioph 43480 | The "universal" set (as large as possible given eldiophss 43475) is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℕ0 → (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐴)) ∈ (Dioph‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | anrabdioph 43481* | Diophantine set builder for conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | orrabdioph 43482* | Diophantine set builder for disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 3anrabdioph 43483* | Diophantine set builder for ternary conjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 3orrabdioph 43484* | Diophantine set builder for ternary disjunctions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ (({𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁) ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝜒} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒)} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 2sbcrex 43485* | Exchange an existential quantifier with two substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbc2rex 43486* | Exchange a substitution with two existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbc4rex 43487* | Exchange a substitution with four existentials. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by NM, 24-Aug-2018.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎]∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑐 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 ∃𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 [𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrot3 43488* | Rotate a sequence of three explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbcrot5 43489* | Rotate a sequence of five explicit substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒]𝜑 ↔ [𝐵 / 𝑏][𝐶 / 𝑐][𝐷 / 𝑑][𝐸 / 𝑒][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | sbccomieg 43490* | Commute two explicit substitutions, using an implicit substitution to rewrite the exiting substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.) |
| ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → 𝐵 = 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ([𝐴 / 𝑎][𝐵 / 𝑏]𝜑 ↔ [𝐶 / 𝑏][𝐴 / 𝑎]𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rexrabdioph 43491* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantification. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ (𝑣 = (𝑡‘𝑀) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑢 = (𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜑)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜓} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | rexfrabdioph 43492* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑀)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑀)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 2rexfrabdioph 43493* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐿)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐿)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 3rexfrabdioph 43494* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, two variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐾)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐾)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 4rexfrabdioph 43495* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, four variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐽)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐽)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 6rexfrabdioph 43496* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, six variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐻)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐻)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | 7rexfrabdioph 43497* | Diophantine set builder for existential quantifier, explicit substitution, seven variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (𝑀 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (𝐿 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐽 = (𝐾 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐽 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐼 + 1) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐻 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝐺)) ∣ [(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢][(𝑡‘𝑀) / 𝑣][(𝑡‘𝐿) / 𝑤][(𝑡‘𝐾) / 𝑥][(𝑡‘𝐽) / 𝑦][(𝑡‘𝐼) / 𝑧][(𝑡‘𝐻) / 𝑝][(𝑡‘𝐺) / 𝑞]𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝐺)) → {𝑢 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ ∃𝑣 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑤 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑥 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑧 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑝 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑞 ∈ ℕ0 𝜑} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | rabdiophlem1 43498* | Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Convert polynomial-ness of an expression into a constraint suitable for ralimi 3100. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁)) → ∀𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁))𝐴 ∈ ℤ) | ||
| Theorem | rabdiophlem2 43499* | Lemma for arithmetic diophantine sets. Reuse a polynomial expression under a new quantifier. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑁 + 1) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑢 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑀)) ↦ ⦋(𝑡 ↾ (1...𝑁)) / 𝑢⦌𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑀))) | ||
| Theorem | elnn0rabdioph 43500* | Diophantine set builder for nonnegativity constraints. The first builder which uses a witness variable internally; an expression is nonnegative if there is a nonnegative integer equal to it. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (𝑡 ∈ (ℤ ↑m (1...𝑁)) ↦ 𝐴) ∈ (mzPoly‘(1...𝑁))) → {𝑡 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...𝑁)) ∣ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ0} ∈ (Dioph‘𝑁)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |