P. 435 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 43401-43500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	onnobdayg 43401	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number of that birthday. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐴 × {𝐵})) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bdaybndex 43402	Bounds formed from the birthday are surreal numbers. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → (𝐵 × {𝐶}) ∈ No )
Theorem	bdaybndbday 43403	Bounds formed from the birthday have the same birthday. (Contributed by RP, 30-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ No ∧ 𝐵 = ( bday ‘𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ {1o, 2o}) → ( bday ‘(𝐵 × {𝐶})) = ( bday ‘𝐴))
Theorem	onno 43404	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No )
Theorem	onnoi 43405	Every ordinal maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	0no 43406	Ordinal zero maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ No
Theorem	1no 43407	Ordinal one maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (1o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	2no 43408	Ordinal two maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (2o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	3no 43409	Ordinal three maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (3o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	4no 43410	Ordinal four maps to a surreal number. (Contributed by RP, 21-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (4o × {2o}) ∈ No
Theorem	fnimafnex 43411	The functional image of a function value exists. (Contributed by RP, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 Fn 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝐺‘𝐴)) ∈ V
21.36.4  Short Studies
Theorem	nlimsuc 43412	A successor is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ Lim suc 𝐴)
Theorem	nlim1NEW 43413	1 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 1o
Theorem	nlim2NEW 43414	2 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by BTernaryTau, 1-Dec-2024.) (Proof shortened by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 2o
Theorem	nlim3 43415	3 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 3o
Theorem	nlim4 43416	4 is not a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 13-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ¬ Lim 4o
Theorem	oa1un 43417	Given 𝐴 ∈ On, let 𝐴 +o 1o be defined to be the union of 𝐴 and {𝐴}. Compare with oa1suc 8541. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) = (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴}))
Theorem	oa1cl 43418	𝐴 +o 1o is in On. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 +o 1o) ∈ On)
Theorem	0finon 43419	0 is a finite ordinal. See peano1 7882. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	1finon 43420	1 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8650. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 1o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	2finon 43421	2 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8650. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 2o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	3finon 43422	3 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8650. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 3o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	4finon 43423	4 is a finite ordinal. See 1onn 8650. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ 4o ∈ (On ∩ Fin)
Theorem	finona1cl 43424	The finite ordinals are closed under the add one operation. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (On ∩ Fin) → (𝑁 +o 1o) ∈ (On ∩ Fin))
Theorem	finonex 43425	The finite ordinals are a set. See also onprc 7770 and fiprc 9057 for proof that On and Fin are proper classes. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ (On ∩ Fin) ∈ V
Theorem	fzunt 43426	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Suggested by NM, 21-Jul-2005.) (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ≤ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)) → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntd 43427	Union of two adjacent finite sets of sequential integers that share a common endpoint. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝑀) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzunt1d 43428	Union of two overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ 𝐿)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
Theorem	fzuntgd 43429	Union of two adjacent or overlapping finite sets of sequential integers. (Contributed by RP, 14-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ≤ 𝑀)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ≤ (𝐿 + 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ≤ 𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾...𝐿) ∪ (𝑀...𝑁)) = (𝐾...𝑁))
21.36.4.1  Additional work on conditional logical operator
Theorem	ifpan123g 43430	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∧ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ (((¬ 𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜑 ∨ 𝜏)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜂))))
Theorem	ifpan23 43431	Conjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜃, 𝜏)) ↔ if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃), (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpdfor2 43432	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifporcor 43433	Corollary of commutation of or. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜑, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpdfan2 43434	Define and with conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpancor 43435	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfor 43436	Define or in terms of conditional logic operator and true. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpdfan 43437	Define and with conditional logic operator and false. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpbi2 43438	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜑, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi3 43439	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜃, 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim1 43440	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(¬ 𝜑, ⊤, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot 43441	Restate negated wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊥, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpid2 43442	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, ⊤, ⊥))
Theorem	ifpim2 43443	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ⊤, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi23 43444	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜏, 𝜑, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜏, 𝜓, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor 43445	Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ if-(𝜑, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpbicor 43446	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜑, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpxorcor 43447	Corollary of commutation of biconditional. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpbi1 43448	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 14-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpnot23 43449	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnotnotb 43450	Factor conditional logic operator over negation in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ ¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnorcor 43451	Corollary of commutation of nor. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnancor 43452	Corollary of commutation of and. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜑, ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpnot23b 43453	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpbiidcor2 43454	Restatement of biid 261. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜑, 𝜑)
Theorem	ifpnot23c 43455	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpnot23d 43456	Negation of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ¬ 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpdfnan 43457	Define nand as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊼ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, ⊤))
Theorem	ifpdfxor 43458	Define xor as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜓))
Theorem	ifpbi12 43459	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbi13 43460	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜏, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜏, 𝜃)))
Theorem	ifpbi123 43461	Equivalence theorem for conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 15-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃) ∧ (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)))
Theorem	ifpidg 43462	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜃 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)) ∧ ((𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ (𝜃 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpid3g 43463	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpid2g 43464	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpid1g 43465	Restate wff as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	ifpim23g 43466	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜒, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑)) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ∧ (𝜒 → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓))))
Theorem	ifpim3 43467	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim1 43468	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜑, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim4 43469	Restate implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜓, ¬ 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpnim2 43470	Restate negated implication as conditional logic operator. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (¬ (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ if-(𝜓, ¬ 𝜓, 𝜑))
Theorem	ifpim123g 43471	Implication of conditional logical operators. The right hand side is basically conjunctive normal form which is useful in proofs. (Contributed by RP, 16-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) → if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 → 𝜂)))))
Theorem	ifpim1g 43472	Implication of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) → if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃))))
Theorem	ifp1bi 43473	Substitute the first element of conditional logical operator. (Contributed by RP, 20-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜃)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒))) ∧ (((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜃 → 𝜒)))))
Theorem	ifpbi1b 43474	When the first variable is irrelevant, it can be replaced. (Contributed by RP, 25-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜒) ↔ if-(𝜓, 𝜒, 𝜒))
Theorem	ifpimimb 43475	Factor conditional logic operator over implication in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpororb 43476	Factor conditional logic operator over disjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∨ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∨ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpananb 43477	Factor conditional logic operator over conjunction in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒), (𝜃 ∧ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ∧ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpnannanb 43478	Factor conditional logic operator over nand in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ⊼ 𝜒), (𝜃 ⊼ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ⊼ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpor123g 43479	Disjunction of conditional logical operators. (Contributed by RP, 18-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏) ∨ if-(𝜓, 𝜃, 𝜂)) ↔ ((((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜃)) ∧ ((𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜃))) ∧ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∨ (𝜒 ∨ 𝜂)) ∧ ((¬ 𝜓 → 𝜑) ∨ (𝜏 ∨ 𝜂)))))
Theorem	ifpimim 43480	Consequnce of implication. (Contributed by RP, 17-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 → 𝜒), (𝜃 → 𝜏)) → (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) → if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpbibib 43481	Factor conditional logic operator over biconditional in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒), (𝜃 ↔ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ↔ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
Theorem	ifpxorxorb 43482	Factor conditional logic operator over xor in terms 2 and 3. (Contributed by RP, 21-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (if-(𝜑, (𝜓 ⊻ 𝜒), (𝜃 ⊻ 𝜏)) ↔ (if-(𝜑, 𝜓, 𝜃) ⊻ if-(𝜑, 𝜒, 𝜏)))
21.36.4.2  Sophisms
Theorem	rp-fakeimass 43483	A special case where implication appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-fakeanorass 43484	A special case where a mixture of and and or appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜒 → 𝜑) ↔ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∨ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∨ 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-fakeoranass 43485	A special case where a mixture of or and and appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜒) ↔ (((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 ∨ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	rp-fakeinunass 43486	A special case where a mixture of intersection and union appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 26-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∪ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶)))
Theorem	rp-fakeuninass 43487	A special case where a mixture of union and intersection appears to conform to a mixed associative law. (Contributed by RP, 29-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∩ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∪ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)))
21.36.4.3  Finite Sets Membership in the class of finite sets can be expressed in many ways.
Theorem	rp-isfinite5 43488*	A set is said to be finite if it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with all the natural numbers between 1 and some 𝑛 ∈ ℕ0. (Contributed by RP, 3-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ0 (1...𝑛) ≈ 𝐴)
Theorem	rp-isfinite6 43489*	A set is said to be finite if it is either empty or it can be put in one-to-one correspondence with all the natural numbers between 1 and some 𝑛 ∈ ℕ. (Contributed by RP, 10-Mar-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ (1...𝑛) ≈ 𝐴))
21.36.4.4  General Observations
Theorem	intabssd 43490*	When for each element 𝑦 there is a subset 𝐴 which may substituted for 𝑥 such that 𝑦 satisfying 𝜒 implies 𝑥 satisfies 𝜓 then the intersection of all 𝑥 that satisfy 𝜓 is a subclass the intersection of all 𝑦 that satisfy 𝜒. (Contributed by RP, 17-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ ∩ {𝑦 ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	eu0 43491*	There is only one empty set. (Contributed by RP, 1-Oct-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ ∅ ∧ ∃!𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	epelon2 43492	Over the ordinal numbers, one may define the relation 𝐴 E 𝐵 iff 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 and one finds that, under this ordering, On is a well-ordered class, see epweon 7767. This is a weak form of epelg 5554 which only requires that we know 𝐵 to be a set. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	ontric3g 43493*	For all 𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ On, one and only one of the following hold: 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦, 𝑦 = 𝑥, or 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥. This is a transparent strict trichotomy. (Contributed by RP, 27-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ On ∀𝑦 ∈ On ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ¬ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)))
Theorem	dfsucon 43494*	𝐴 is called a successor ordinal if it is not a limit ordinal and not the empty set. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑥)
Theorem	snen1g 43495	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one iff its content is a set. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ({𝐴} ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	snen1el 43496	A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one if its content is an element of it. (Contributed by RP, 8-Oct-2023.)
⊢ ({𝐴} ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 ∈ {𝐴})
Theorem	sn1dom 43497	A singleton is dominated by ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ {𝐴} ≼ 1o
Theorem	pr2dom 43498	An unordered pair is dominated by ordinal two. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵} ≼ 2o
Theorem	tr3dom 43499	An unordered triple is dominated by ordinal three. (Contributed by RP, 29-Oct-2023.)
⊢ {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ≼ 3o
Theorem	ensucne0 43500	A class equinumerous to a successor is never empty. (Contributed by RP, 11-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by SN, 16-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)