Theorem isufl 24232

Description: Define the (strong) ultrafilter lemma, parameterized over base sets. A set 𝑋 satisfies the ultrafilter lemma if every filter on 𝑋 is a subset of some ultrafilter. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isufl	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))

Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑔,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓, 𝑔)

Proof of Theorem isufl

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6885	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (Fil‘𝑥) = (Fil‘𝑋))
2		fveq2 6885	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (UFil‘𝑥) = (UFil‘𝑋))
3	2	rexeqdv 3321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))
4	1, 3	raleqbidv 3335	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))
5		df-ufl 24221	. 2 ⊢ UFL = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔}
6	4, 5	elab2g 3634	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087   ⊆ wss 3899  ‘cfv 6538  Filcfil 24164  UFilcufil 24218  UFLcufl 24219

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-iota 6494  df-fv 6546  df-ufl 24221

This theorem is used by:  ufli  24233  numufl  24234  ssufl  24237  ufldom  24281