Theorem isufl 24247

Description: Define the (strong) ultrafilter lemma, parameterized over base sets. A set 𝑋 satisfies the ultrafilter lemma if every filter on 𝑋 is a subset of some ultrafilter. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Aug-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isufl	⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))

Distinct variable group:   𝑓,𝑔,𝑋

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑉(𝑓, 𝑔)

Proof of Theorem isufl

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fveq2 6896	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (Fil‘𝑥) = (Fil‘𝑋))
2		fveq2 6896	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (UFil‘𝑥) = (UFil‘𝑋))
3	2	rexeqdv 3324	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))
4	1, 3	raleqbidv 3338	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))
5		df-ufl 24236	. 2 ⊢ UFL = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔}
6	4, 5	elab2g 3637	1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090   ⊆ wss 3900  ‘cfv 6547  Filcfil 24179  UFilcufil 24233  UFLcufl 24234

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-iota 6501  df-fv 6555  df-ufl 24236

This theorem is used by:  ufli  24248  numufl  24249  ssufl  24252  ufldom  24296