Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > isufl | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Define the (strong) ultrafilter lemma, parameterized over base sets. A set 𝑋 satisfies the ultrafilter lemma if every filter on 𝑋 is a subset of some ultrafilter. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
isufl | ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔)) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fveq2 6756 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (Fil‘𝑥) = (Fil‘𝑋)) | |
2 | fveq2 6756 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (UFil‘𝑥) = (UFil‘𝑋)) | |
3 | 2 | rexeqdv 3340 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔)) |
4 | 1, 3 | raleqbidv 3327 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔 ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔)) |
5 | df-ufl 22961 | . 2 ⊢ UFL = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑥)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑥)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔} | |
6 | 4, 5 | elab2g 3604 | 1 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ UFL ↔ ∀𝑓 ∈ (Fil‘𝑋)∃𝑔 ∈ (UFil‘𝑋)𝑓 ⊆ 𝑔)) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 205 = wceq 1539 ∈ wcel 2108 ∀wral 3063 ∃wrex 3064 ⊆ wss 3883 ‘cfv 6418 Filcfil 22904 UFilcufil 22958 UFLcufl 22959 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1799 ax-4 1813 ax-5 1914 ax-6 1972 ax-7 2012 ax-8 2110 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2709 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 206 df-an 396 df-or 844 df-3an 1087 df-tru 1542 df-fal 1552 df-ex 1784 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2730 df-clel 2817 df-ral 3068 df-rex 3069 df-rab 3072 df-v 3424 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-nul 4254 df-if 4457 df-sn 4559 df-pr 4561 df-op 4565 df-uni 4837 df-br 5071 df-iota 6376 df-fv 6426 df-ufl 22961 |
This theorem is referenced by: ufli 22973 numufl 22974 ssufl 22977 ufldom 23021 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |