HSE Home Hilbert Space Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  HSE Home  >  Th. List  >  leopg Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem leopg 32632
Description: Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
leopg ((𝑇𝐴𝑈𝐵) → (𝑇op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑇   𝑥,𝑈

Proof of Theorem leopg
Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 oveq2 7423 . . . 4 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑢op 𝑡) = (𝑢op 𝑇))
21eleq1d 2845 . . 3 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑢op 𝑡) ∈ HrmOp ↔ (𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp))
31fveq1d 6882 . . . . . 6 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) = ((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥))
43oveq1d 7430 . . . . 5 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) = (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))
54breq2d 5115 . . . 4 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
65ralbidv 3185 . . 3 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
72, 6anbi12d 644 . 2 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((𝑢op 𝑡) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
8 oveq1 7422 . . . 4 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (𝑢op 𝑇) = (𝑈op 𝑇))
98eleq1d 2845 . . 3 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → ((𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ↔ (𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp))
108fveq1d 6882 . . . . . 6 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → ((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) = ((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥))
1110oveq1d 7430 . . . . 5 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) = (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))
1211breq2d 5115 . . . 4 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
1312ralbidv 3185 . . 3 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
149, 13anbi12d 644 . 2 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (((𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
15 df-leop 32362 . 2 op = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ ((𝑢op 𝑡) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))}
167, 14, 15brabg 5518 1 ((𝑇𝐴𝑈𝐵) → (𝑇op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 401   = wceq 1570  wcel 2145  wral 3076   class class class wbr 5103  cfv 6534  (class class class)co 7415  0cc0 11146  cle 11290  chba 31429   ·ih csp 31432  op chod 31450  HrmOpcho 31460  op cleo 31468
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-pr 5398
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ral 3077  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-iota 6490  df-fv 6542  df-ov 7418  df-leop 32362
This theorem is used by:  leop  32633  leoprf2  32637
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator