HSE Home Hilbert Space Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  HSE Home  >  Th. List  >  leopg Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem leopg 32483
Description: Ordering relation for positive operators. Definition of positive operator ordering in [Kreyszig] p. 470. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
leopg ((𝑇𝐴𝑈𝐵) → (𝑇op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝑥,𝑇   𝑥,𝑈

Proof of Theorem leopg
Dummy variables 𝑢 𝑡 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 oveq2 7418 . . . 4 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (𝑢op 𝑡) = (𝑢op 𝑇))
21eleq1d 2848 . . 3 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑢op 𝑡) ∈ HrmOp ↔ (𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp))
31fveq1d 6883 . . . . . 6 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → ((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) = ((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥))
43oveq1d 7425 . . . . 5 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) = (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))
54breq2d 5121 . . . 4 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
65ralbidv 3188 . . 3 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
72, 6anbi12d 643 . 2 (𝑡 = 𝑇 → (((𝑢op 𝑡) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
8 oveq1 7417 . . . 4 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (𝑢op 𝑇) = (𝑈op 𝑇))
98eleq1d 2848 . . 3 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → ((𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ↔ (𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp))
108fveq1d 6883 . . . . . 6 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → ((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) = ((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥))
1110oveq1d 7425 . . . . 5 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) = (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))
1211breq2d 5121 . . . 4 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
1312ralbidv 3188 . . 3 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)))
149, 13anbi12d 643 . 2 (𝑢 = 𝑈 → (((𝑢op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
15 df-leop 32213 . 2 op = {⟨𝑡, 𝑢⟩ ∣ ((𝑢op 𝑡) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑢op 𝑡)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))}
167, 14, 15brabg 5524 1 ((𝑇𝐴𝑈𝐵) → (𝑇op 𝑈 ↔ ((𝑈op 𝑇) ∈ HrmOp ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ ℋ 0 ≤ (((𝑈op 𝑇)‘𝑥) ·ih 𝑥))))
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  wi 4  wb 209  wa 400   = wceq 1570  wcel 2143  wral 3079   class class class wbr 5109  cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  0cc0 11104  cle 11248  chba 31280   ·ih csp 31283  op chod 31301  HrmOpcho 31311  op cleo 31319
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-pr 5404
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-ral 3080  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-iota 6492  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-leop 32213
This theorem is used by:  leop  32484  leoprf2  32488
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator