P. 317 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 31601-31700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	mdsl0 31601	A sublattice condition that transfers the modular pair property. Exercise 12 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. Also Lemma 1.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ )) → ((((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷))
Theorem	ssmd1 31602	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	ssmd2 31603	Ordering implies the modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	ssdmd1 31604	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	ssdmd2 31605	Ordering implies the dual modular pair property. Remark in [MaedaMaeda] p. 1. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (⊥‘𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	dmdsl3 31606	Sublattice mapping for a dual-modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = 𝐶)
Theorem	mdsl3 31607	Sublattice mapping for a modular pair. Part of Theorem 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐶)
Theorem	mdslle1i 31608	Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslle2i 31609	Order preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdslj1i 31610	Join preservation of the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ∩ 𝐵) = ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslj2i 31611	Meet preservation of the reverse mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∨ℋ 𝐴) = ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdsl1i 31612*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))) ↔ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	mdsl2i 31613*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsl2bi 31614*	If the modular pair property holds in a sublattice, it holds in the whole lattice. Lemma 1.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))))
Theorem	cvmdi 31615	The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	mdslmd1lem1 31616	Lemma for mdslmd1i 31620. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem2 31617	Lemma for mdslmd1i 31620. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))) → (((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵) → (((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑅 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))) → (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝐷) → ((𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝑅 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷)))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem3 31618*	Lemma for mdslmd1i 31620. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ⊆ 𝐷 → (((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷))) → ((((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵))))))
Theorem	mdslmd1lem4 31619*	Lemma for mdslmd1i 31620. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))))) → (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵) → (((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵)) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)) ⊆ ((𝑥 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))) → (((𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐷) → ((𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝑥 ∨ℋ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷)))))
Theorem	mdslmd1i 31620	Preservation of the modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2 (meet version). (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslmd2i 31621	Preservation of the modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2 (join version). (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ 𝐵)) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) 𝑀ℋ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐴)))
Theorem	mdsldmd1i 31622	Preservation of the dual modular pair property in the one-to-one onto mapping between the two sublattices in Lemma 1.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴) ∧ (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐷) ∧ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷) ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐶 𝑀ℋ* 𝐷 ↔ (𝐶 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ* (𝐷 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdslmd3i 31623	Modular pair conditions that imply the modular pair property in a sublattice. Lemma 1.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 23-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) 𝑀ℋ 𝐶) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐴)) → 𝐷 𝑀ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	mdslmd4i 31624	Modular pair condition that implies the modular pair property in a sublattice. Lemma 1.5.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⊆ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 𝑀ℋ 𝐷)
Theorem	csmdsymi 31625*	Cross-symmetry implies M-symmetry. Theorem 1.9.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 24-Dec-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((∀𝑐 ∈ Cℋ (𝑐 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝑐) ∧ 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdexchi 31626	An exchange lemma for modular pairs. Lemma 1.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 𝑀ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∧ (𝐶 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) 𝑀ℋ 𝐵 ∧ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvmd 31627	The covering property implies the modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cvdmd 31628	The covering property implies the dual modular pair property. Lemma 7.5.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
20.8.2  Atoms
Definition	df-at 31629	Define the set of atoms in a Hilbert lattice. An atom is a nonzero element of a lattice such that anything less than it is zero, i.e. it is the smallest nonzero element of the lattice. Definition of atom in [Kalmbach] p. 15. See ela 31630 and elat2 31631 for membership relations. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms = {𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∣ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝑥}
Theorem	ela 31630	Atoms in a Hilbert lattice are the elements that cover the zero subspace. Definition of atom in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	elat2 31631*	Expanded membership relation for the set of atoms, i.e. the predicate "is an atom (of the Hilbert lattice)." An atom is a nonzero element of a lattice such that anything less than it is zero, i.e. it is the smallest nonzero element of the lattice. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∨ 𝑥 = 0ℋ)))))
Theorem	elatcv0 31632	A Hilbert lattice element is an atom iff it covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	atcv0 31633	An atom covers the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 0ℋ ⋖ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	atssch 31634	Atoms are a subset of the Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ HAtoms ⊆ Cℋ
Theorem	atelch 31635	An atom is a Hilbert lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	atne0 31636	An atom is not the Hilbert lattice zero. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms → 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ)
Theorem	atss 31637	A lattice element smaller than an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)))
Theorem	atsseq 31638	Two atoms in a subset relationship are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcveq0 31639	A Hilbert lattice element covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	h1da 31640	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐴})) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	spansna 31641	The span of the singleton of a vector is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (span‘{𝐴}) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	sh1dle 31642	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any subspace containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ch1dle 31643	A 1-dimensional subspace is less than or equal to any member of Cℋ containing its generating vector. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	atom1d 31644*	The 1-dimensional subspaces of Hilbert space are its atoms. Part of Remark 10.3.5 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℋ (𝑥 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 = (span‘{𝑥})))
20.8.3  Superposition principle
Theorem	superpos 31645*	Superposition Principle. If 𝐴 and 𝐵 are distinct atoms, there exists a third atom, distinct from 𝐴 and 𝐵, that is the superposition of 𝐴 and 𝐵. Definition 3.4-3(a) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
20.8.4  Atoms, exchange and covering properties, atomicity
Theorem	chcv1 31646	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chcv2 31647	The Hilbert lattice has the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chjatom 31648	The join of a closed subspace and an atom equals their subspace sum. Special case of remark in [Kalmbach] p. 65, stating that if 𝐴 or 𝐵 is finite-dimensional, then this equality holds. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	shatomici 31649*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 24-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomici 31650*	The Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	hatomic 31651*	A Hilbert lattice is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. Also Definition 3.4-2 in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8). (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	shatomistici 31652*	The lattice of Hilbert subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (span‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	hatomistici 31653*	Cℋ is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 140. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2002.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = ( ∨ℋ ‘{𝑥 ∈ HAtoms ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴})
Theorem	chpssati 31654*	Two Hilbert lattice elements in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	chrelati 31655*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ⊊ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2i 31656*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvati 31657*	If a Hilbert lattice element covers another, it equals the other joined with some atom. This is a consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	cvbr4i 31658*	An alternate way to express the covering property. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexchlem 31659	Lemma for cvexchi 31660. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexchi 31660	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat2 31661*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3 31662*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	chrelat3i 31663*	A consequence of the relative atomicity of Hilbert space: the ordering of Hilbert lattice elements is completely determined by the atoms they majorize. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	chrelat4i 31664*	A consequence of relative atomicity. Extensionality principle: two lattice elements are equal iff they majorize the same atoms. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	cvexch 31665	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ⋖ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cvp 31666	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ ↔ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atnssm0 31667	The meet of a Hilbert lattice element and an incomparable atom is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	atnemeq0 31668	The meet of distinct atoms is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ))
Theorem	atssma 31669	The meet with an atom's superset is the atom. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcv0eq 31670	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → (0ℋ ⋖ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	atcv1 31671	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 = 0ℋ ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	atexch 31672	The Hilbert lattice satisfies the atom exchange property. Proposition 1(i) of [Kalmbach] p. 140. A version of this theorem related to vector analysis was originally proved by Hermann Grassmann in 1862. Also Definition 3.4-3(b) in [MegPav2000] p. 2345 (PDF p. 8) (use atnemeq0 31668 to obtain atom inequality). (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 0ℋ) → 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atomli 31673	An assertion holding in atomic orthomodular lattices that is equivalent to the exchange axiom. Proposition 3.2.17 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 66. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) ∈ (HAtoms ∪ {0ℋ}))
Theorem	atoml2i 31674	An assertion holding in atomic orthomodular lattices that is equivalent to the exchange axiom. Proposition P8(ii) of [BeltramettiCassinelli1] p. 400. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (⊥‘𝐴)) ∈ HAtoms)
Theorem	atordi 31675	An ordering law for a Hilbert lattice atom and a commuting subspace. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	atcvatlem 31676	Lemma for atcvati 31677. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))) → (¬ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvati 31677	A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊊ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvat2i 31678	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atord 31679	An ordering law for a Hilbert lattice atom and a commuting subspace. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴)))
Theorem	atcvat2 31680	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 ⋖ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 ∈ HAtoms))
20.8.5  Irreducibility
Theorem	chirredlem1 31681*	Lemma for chirredi 31685. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝑞 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑝 ∩ (⊥‘𝑟)) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	chirredlem2 31682*	Lemma for chirredi 31685. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ ((𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → ((⊥‘𝑟) ∩ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞)) = 𝑞)
Theorem	chirredlem3 31683*	Lemma for chirredi 31685. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑟 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑟 = 𝑝))
Theorem	chirredlem4 31684*	Lemma for chirredi 31685. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑞 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ (𝑝 ∨ℋ 𝑞))) → (𝑟 = 𝑝 ∨ 𝑟 = 𝑞))
Theorem	chirredi 31685*	The Hilbert lattice is irreducible: any element that commutes with all elements must be zero or one. Theorem 14.8.4 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 166. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Cℋ → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 = 0ℋ ∨ 𝐴 = ℋ)
Theorem	chirred 31686*	The Hilbert lattice is irreducible: any element that commutes with all elements must be zero or one. Theorem 14.8.4 of [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 166. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝑥) → (𝐴 = 0ℋ ∨ 𝐴 = ℋ))
20.8.6  Atoms (cont.)
Theorem	atcvat3i 31687	A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → (((¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) ∈ HAtoms))
Theorem	atcvat4i 31688*	A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐶 ∈ HAtoms) → ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ HAtoms (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑥))))
Theorem	atdmd 31689	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(c) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ* 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd 31690	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the modular pair property if the first is an atom. Theorem 7.6(b) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atmd2 31691	Two Hilbert lattice elements have the dual modular pair property if the second is an atom. Part of Exercise 6 of [Kalmbach] p. 103. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ HAtoms) → 𝐴 𝑀ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	atabsi 31692	Absorption of an incomparable atom. Similar to Exercise 7.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 34. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	atabs2i 31693	Absorption of an incomparable atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ HAtoms → (¬ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐴))
20.8.7  Modular symmetry
Theorem	mdsymlem1 31694*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ Cℋ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem2 31695*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → (𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem3 31696*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑝 ∈ HAtoms ∧ ¬ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶) ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ) → ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	mdsymlem4 31697*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. This is the forward direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑝 ∈ HAtoms → ((𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) ∧ 𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))))
Theorem	mdsymlem5 31698*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∧ 𝑟 ∈ HAtoms) → (¬ 𝑞 = 𝑝 → ((𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)) → (((𝑐 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑐) ∧ 𝑝 ∈ HAtoms) → (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑐 → 𝑝 ⊆ ((𝑐 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐴))))))
Theorem	mdsymlem6 31699*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. This is the converse direction of Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168, and is based on the proof of Theorem 1(d) to (e) of [Maeda] p. 167. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵))) → 𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴)
Theorem	mdsymlem7 31700*	Lemma for mdsymi 31702. Lemma 4(i) of [Maeda] p. 168. Note that Maeda's 1965 definition of dual modular pair has reversed arguments compared to the later (1970) definition given in Remark 29.6 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 130, which is the one that we use. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑝)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 0ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℋ) → (𝐵 𝑀ℋ* 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) → ∃𝑞 ∈ HAtoms ∃𝑟 ∈ HAtoms (𝑝 ⊆ (𝑞 ∨ℋ 𝑟) ∧ (𝑞 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ⊆ 𝐵)))))