P. 317 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 31601-31700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	spansneleqi 31601	Membership relation implied by equality of spans. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℋ → ((span‘{𝐴}) = (span‘{𝐵}) → 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})))
Theorem	spansneleq 31602	Membership relation that implies equality of spans. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → (𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → (span‘{𝐴}) = (span‘{𝐵})))
Theorem	spansnss 31603	The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 5-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	elspansn3 31604	A member of the span of the singleton of a vector is a member of a subspace containing the vector. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	elspansn4 31605	A span membership condition implying two vectors belong to the same subspace. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 0ℎ)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	elspansn5 31606	A vector belonging to both a subspace and the span of the singleton of a vector not in it must be zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Sℋ → (((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)) → 𝐶 = 0ℎ))
Theorem	spansnss2 31607	The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace. (Contributed by NM, 16-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Sℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (span‘{𝐵}) ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	normcan 31608	Cancellation-type law that "extracts" a vector 𝐴 from its inner product with a proportional vector 𝐵. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 0ℎ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵})) → (((𝐴 ·ih 𝐵) / ((normℎ‘𝐵)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	pjspansn 31609	A projection on the span of a singleton. (The proof ws shortened by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0ℎ) → ((projℎ‘(span‘{𝐴}))‘𝐵) = (((𝐵 ·ih 𝐴) / ((normℎ‘𝐴)↑2)) ·ℎ 𝐴))
Theorem	spansnpji 31610	A subset of Hilbert space is orthogonal to the span of the singleton of a projection onto its orthocomplement. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(span‘{((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)}))
Theorem	spanunsni 31611	The span of the union of a closed subspace with a singleton equals the span of its union with an orthogonal singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})) = (span‘(𝐴 ∪ {((projℎ‘(⊥‘𝐴))‘𝐵)}))
Theorem	spanpr 31612	The span of a pair of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)}) ⊆ (span‘{𝐴, 𝐵}))
Theorem	h1datomi 31613	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ))
Theorem	h1datom 31614	A 1-dimensional subspace is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jul-2001.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) → (𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘{𝐵})) ∨ 𝐴 = 0ℋ)))
20.5.5  Commutes relation for Hilbert lattice elements
Definition	df-cm 31615*	Define the commutes relation (on the Hilbert lattice). Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20, who uses the notation xCy for "x commutes with y." See cmbri 31622 for membership relation. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶ℋ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ 𝑥 = ((𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∨ℋ (𝑥 ∩ (⊥‘𝑦))))}
Theorem	cmbr 31616	Binary relation expressing 𝐴 commutes with 𝐵. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)))))
Theorem	pjoml2i 31617	Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml3i 31618	Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml4i 31619	Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml5i 31620	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml6i 31621*	An equivalent of the orthomodular law. Theorem 29.13(e) of [MaedaMaeda] p. 132. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ∃𝑥 ∈ Cℋ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑥) ∧ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	cmbri 31622	Binary relation expressing the commutes relation. Definition of commutes in [Kalmbach] p. 20. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))))
Theorem	cmcmlem 31623	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 3.4 of [Beran] p. 45. (Contributed by NM, 3-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cmcmi 31624	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cmcm2i 31625	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))
Theorem	cmcm3i 31626	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmcm4i 31627	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))
Theorem	cmbr2i 31628	Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))))
Theorem	cmcmii 31629	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	cmcm2ii 31630	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)
Theorem	cmcm3ii 31631	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵
Theorem	cmbr3i 31632	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵))
Theorem	cmbr4i 31633	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	lecmi 31634	Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	lecmii 31635	Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵
Theorem	cmj1i 31636	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmj2i 31637	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its join. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmm1i 31638	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmm2i 31639	A Hilbert lattice element commutes with its meet. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)
Theorem	cmbr3 31640	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	cm0 31641	The zero Hilbert lattice element commutes with every element. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Cℋ → 0ℋ 𝐶ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	cmidi 31642	The commutes relation is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐴
Theorem	pjoml2 31643	Variation of orthomodular law. Definition in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ 𝐵)) = 𝐵)
Theorem	pjoml3 31644	Variation of orthomodular law. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∩ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵)) = 𝐵))
Theorem	pjoml5 31645	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 ∨ℋ ((⊥‘𝐴) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cmcm 31646	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴))
Theorem	cmcm3 31647	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ (⊥‘𝐴) 𝐶ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	cmcm2 31648	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ) → (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	lecm 31649	Comparable Hilbert lattice elements commute. Theorem 2.3(iii) of [Beran] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵)
20.5.6  Foulis-Holland theorem
Theorem	fh1 31650	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
Theorem	fh2 31651	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)))
Theorem	cm2j 31652	A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2006.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ ) ∧ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶)) → 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh1i 31653	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. First of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh2i 31654	Foulis-Holland Theorem. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Second of two parts. Theorem 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 25. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∩ 𝐴) ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh3i 31655	Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	fh4i 31656	Variation of the Foulis-Holland Theorem. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐶)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	cm2ji 31657	A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their join. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)
Theorem	cm2mi 31658	A lattice element that commutes with two others also commutes with their meet. Theorem 4.2 of [Beran] p. 49. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2009.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 𝐶ℋ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐶)
20.5.7  Quantum Logic Explorer axioms
Theorem	qlax1i 31659	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = (⊥‘(⊥‘𝐴))
Theorem	qlax2i 31660	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)
Theorem	qlax3i 31661	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶))
Theorem	qlax4i 31662	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))
Theorem	qlax5i 31663	One of the equations showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ 𝐵))) = 𝐴
Theorem	qlaxr1i 31664	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r1" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴
Theorem	qlaxr2i 31665	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r2" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶
Theorem	qlaxr4i 31666	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r4" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (⊥‘𝐴) = (⊥‘𝐵)
Theorem	qlaxr5i 31667	One of the conditions showing Cℋ is an ortholattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r5" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶)
Theorem	qlaxr3i 31668	A variation of the orthomodular law, showing Cℋ is an orthomodular lattice. (This corresponds to axiom "ax-r3" in the Quantum Logic Explorer.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ (𝐶 ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐶)) = ((⊥‘((⊥‘𝐴) ∨ℋ (⊥‘𝐵))) ∨ℋ (⊥‘(𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵)))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵
20.5.8  Orthogonal subspaces
Theorem	chscllem1 31669*	Lemma for chscl 31673. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:ℕ⟶𝐴)
Theorem	chscllem2 31670*	Lemma for chscl 31673. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑣 )
Theorem	chscllem3 31671*	Lemma for chscl 31673. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝑁) = (𝐶 +ℎ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐹‘𝑁))
Theorem	chscllem4 31672*	Lemma for chscl 31673. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:ℕ⟶(𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ⇝𝑣 𝑢)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐴)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ ↦ ((projℎ‘𝐵)‘(𝐻‘𝑛)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	chscl 31673	The subspace sum of two closed orthogonal spaces is closed. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	osumi 31674	If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. Note that the (countable) Axiom of Choice is used for this proof via pjhth 31425, although "the hard part" of this proof, chscl 31673, requires no choice. (Contributed by NM, 28-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	osumcori 31675	Corollary of osumi 31674. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵))) = ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (⊥‘𝐵)))
Theorem	osumcor2i 31676	Corollary of osumi 31674, showing it holds under the weaker hypothesis that 𝐴 and 𝐵 commute. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 𝐶ℋ 𝐵 → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	osum 31677	If two closed subspaces of a Hilbert space are orthogonal, their subspace sum equals their subspace join. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 31-Oct-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)) → (𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵))
Theorem	spansnji 31678	The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Proof suggested by Eric Schechter 1-Jun-2004.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵}))
Theorem	spansnj 31679	The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace equals their join. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐵})))
Theorem	spansnscl 31680	The subspace sum of a closed subspace and a one-dimensional subspace is closed. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → (𝐴 +ℋ (span‘{𝐵})) ∈ Cℋ )
Theorem	sumspansn 31681	The sum of two vectors belong to the span of one of them iff the other vector also belongs. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵) ∈ (span‘{𝐴}) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (span‘{𝐴})))
Theorem	spansnm0i 31682	The meet of different one-dimensional subspaces is the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ (span‘{𝐵}) → ((span‘{𝐴}) ∩ (span‘{𝐵})) = 0ℋ)
Theorem	nonbooli 31683	A Hilbert lattice with two or more dimensions fails the distributive law and therefore cannot be a Boolean algebra. This counterexample demonstrates a condition where ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)) = 0ℋ but (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ 0ℋ. The antecedent specifies that the vectors 𝐴 and 𝐵 are nonzero and non-colinear. The last three hypotheses assign one-dimensional subspaces to 𝐹, 𝐺, and 𝐻. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2005.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (span‘{𝐴})    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (span‘{𝐵})    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (span‘{(𝐴 +ℎ 𝐵)})    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐺 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐻 ∩ (𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ≠ ((𝐻 ∩ 𝐹) ∨ℋ (𝐻 ∩ 𝐺)))
Theorem	spansncvi 31684	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶})))
Theorem	spansncv 31685	Hilbert space has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-2004.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℋ) → ((𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))) → 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∨ℋ (span‘{𝐶}))))
20.5.9  Orthoarguesian laws 5OA and 3OA
Theorem	5oalem1 31686	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 1-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑅)) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅))))
Theorem	5oalem2 31687	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤)) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)))
Theorem	5oalem3 31688	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺))))
Theorem	5oalem4 31689	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺)) ∧ ((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)))))
Theorem	5oalem5 31690	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷)) ∧ ((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ (𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆))) ∧ (((𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢) ∧ (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)) ∧ (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔) = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢))) → (𝑥 −ℎ 𝑧) ∈ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))
Theorem	5oalem6 31691	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ℎ = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ ℎ = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑓 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ 𝐺) ∧ ℎ = (𝑓 +ℎ 𝑔)) ∧ ((𝑣 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ ℎ = (𝑣 +ℎ 𝑢)))) → ℎ ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆))))))))))
Theorem	5oalem7 31692	Lemma for orthoarguesian law 5OA. (Contributed by NM, 4-May-2000.) TODO: replace uses of ee4anv 2357 with 4exdistrv 1956 as in 3oalem3 31696. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Sℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Sℋ    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))) +ℋ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 +ℋ 𝑆)) +ℋ ((𝐹 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 +ℋ 𝑆)))))))))
Theorem	5oai 31693	Orthoarguesian law 5OA. This 8-variable inference is called 5OA because it can be converted to a 5-variable equation (see Quantum Logic Explorer). (Contributed by NM, 5-May-2000.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐺 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐵) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝐺) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝐴 ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐷)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∩ ((((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐴 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))) ∨ℋ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐹) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝐺)) ∩ (((𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐷 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ∨ℋ ((𝐹 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐺 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))))))))
Theorem	3oalem1 31694*	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → (((𝑥 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑦 ∈ ℋ) ∧ 𝑣 ∈ ℋ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ ℋ ∧ 𝑤 ∈ ℋ)))
Theorem	3oalem2 31695*	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑥 +ℎ 𝑦)) ∧ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑣 = (𝑧 +ℎ 𝑤))) → 𝑣 ∈ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))))
Theorem	3oalem3 31696	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑆 ∈ Cℋ    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆)))))
Theorem	3oalem4 31697	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
Theorem	3oalem5 31698	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 +ℋ 𝑆)) = ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆))
Theorem	3oalem6 31699	Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 +ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 +ℋ ((𝐵 +ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 +ℋ 𝑆))))) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))))
Theorem	3oai 31700	3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. Equation IV of [GodowskiGreechie] p. 249. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ Cℋ    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = ((⊥‘𝐶) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝑅) ∩ (𝐶 ∨ℋ 𝑆)) ⊆ (𝐵 ∨ℋ (𝑅 ∩ (𝑆 ∨ℋ ((𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐶) ∩ (𝑅 ∨ℋ 𝑆)))))