Theorem nfiotadw 6500

Description: Deduction version of nfiotaw 6501. Version of nfiotad 6502 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2401. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.) Avoid ax-13 2401. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfiotadw.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfiotadw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfiotadw	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfiotadw

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfiota2 6498	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑦𝜓) = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)}
2		nfv 1946	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
3		nfiotadw.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4		nfiotadw.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
5		nfvd 1947	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
6	4, 5	nfbid 1934	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
7	3, 6	nfald 2358	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8	2, 7	nfabdw 2943	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)})
9	8	nfunid 4872	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)})
10	1, 9	nfcxfrd 2921	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1567  Ⅎwnf 1815  {cab 2738  Ⅎwnfc 2907  ∪ cuni 4866  ℩cio 6495

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-v 3452  df-ss 3897  df-sn 4585  df-uni 4867  df-iota 6497

This theorem is used by:  nfiotaw  6501  nfriotadw  7389