Theorem nfiotadw 6444

Description: Deduction version of nfiotaw 6445. Version of nfiotad 6446 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2380. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.) Avoid ax-13 2380. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nfiotadw.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
nfiotadw.2	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfiotadw	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem nfiotadw

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		dfiota2 6442	. 2 ⊢ (℩𝑦𝜓) = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)}
2		nfv 1921	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
3		nfiotadw.1	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
4		nfiotadw.2	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)
5		nfvd 1922	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑧)
6	4, 5	nfbid 1909	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
7	3, 6	nfald 2337	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧))
8	2, 7	nfabdw 2922	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥{𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)})
9	8	nfunid 4844	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∪ {𝑧 ∣ ∀𝑦(𝜓 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝑧)})
10	1, 9	nfcxfrd 2900	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207  ∀wal 1545  Ⅎwnf 1790  {cab 2717  Ⅎwnfc 2886  ∪ cuni 4838  ℩cio 6439

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121  ax-9 2129  ax-10 2152  ax-11 2168  ax-12 2189  ax-ext 2711

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 854  df-tru 1550  df-ex 1787  df-nf 1791  df-sb 2074  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2731  df-clel 2814  df-nfc 2888  df-ral 3054  df-rex 3064  df-v 3433  df-ss 3900  df-sn 4556  df-uni 4839  df-iota 6441

This theorem is referenced by:  nfiotaw  6445  nfriotadw  7321