P. 65 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 6401-6500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ordnbtwn 6401	There is no set between an ordinal class and its successor. Generalized Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1998.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
Theorem	onnbtwn 6402	There is no set between an ordinal number and its successor. Proposition 7.25 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 41. Lemma 1.15 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴))
Theorem	sucssel 6403	A set whose successor is a subset of another class is a member of that class. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1995.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (suc 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	orddif 6404	Ordinal derived from its successor. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-1998.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → 𝐴 = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐴}))
Theorem	orduniss 6405	An ordinal class includes its union. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	ordtri2or 6406	A trichotomy law for ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordtri2or2 6407	A trichotomy law for ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	ordtri2or3 6408	A consequence of total ordering for ordinal classes. Similar to ordtri2or2 6407. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐴 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∨ 𝐵 = (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵)))
Theorem	ordelinel 6409	The intersection of two ordinal classes is an element of a third if and only if either one of them is. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 24-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordssun 6410	Property of a subclass of the maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 ⊆ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordequn 6411	The maximum (i.e. union) of two ordinals is either one or the other. Similar to Exercise 14 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐶) → (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ 𝐶) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordun 6412	The maximum (i.e., union) of two ordinals is ordinal. Exercise 12 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → Ord (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵))
Theorem	onunel 6413	The union of two ordinals is in a third iff both of the first two are. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 10-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)))
Theorem	ordunisssuc 6414	A subclass relationship for union and successor of ordinal classes. (Contributed by NM, 28-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵))
Theorem	suc11 6415	The successor operation behaves like a one-to-one function. Compare Exercise 16 of [Enderton] p. 194. (Contributed by NM, 3-Sep-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (suc 𝐴 = suc 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onun2 6416	The union of two ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ On)
Theorem	ontr 6417	An ordinal number is a transitive class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.) Put in closed form. (Resised by BJ, 28-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → Tr 𝐴)
Theorem	onunisuc 6418	An ordinal number is equal to the union of its successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.) Generalize from onunisuci 6427. (Revised by BJ, 28-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∪ suc 𝐴 = 𝐴)
Theorem	onordi 6419	An ordinal number is an ordinal class. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ Ord 𝐴
Theorem	onirri 6420	An ordinal number is not a member of itself. Theorem 7M(c) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	oneli 6421	A member of an ordinal number is an ordinal number. Theorem 7M(a) of [Enderton] p. 192. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ∈ On)
Theorem	onelssi 6422	A member of an ordinal number is a subset of it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Aug-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	onssneli 6423	An ordering law for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	onssnel2i 6424	An ordering law for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	onelini 6425	An element of an ordinal number equals the intersection with it. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = (𝐵 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	oneluni 6426	An ordinal number equals its union with any element. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
Theorem	onunisuci 6427	An ordinal number is equal to the union of its successor. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ suc 𝐴 = 𝐴
Theorem	onsseli 6428	Subset is equivalent to membership or equality for ordinal numbers. (Contributed by NM, 15-Sep-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	onun2i 6429	The union of two ordinal numbers is an ordinal number. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-1994.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ On    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ On    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ On
Theorem	unizlim 6430	An ordinal equal to its own union is either zero or a limit ordinal. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ Lim 𝐴)))
Theorem	on0eqel 6431	An ordinal number either equals zero or contains zero. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∅ ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	snsn0non 6432	The singleton of the singleton of the empty set is not an ordinal (nor a natural number by omsson 7800). It can be used to represent an "undefined" value for a partial operation on natural or ordinal numbers. See also onxpdisj 6433. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
⊢ ¬ {{∅}} ∈ On
Theorem	onxpdisj 6433	Ordinal numbers and ordered pairs are disjoint collections. This theorem can be used if we want to extend a set of ordinal numbers or ordered pairs with disjoint elements. See also snsn0non 6432. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (On ∩ (V × V)) = ∅
Theorem	onnev 6434	The class of ordinal numbers is not equal to the universe. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 10-Jan-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ On ≠ V
2.3.15  Definite description binder (inverted iota)
Syntax	cio 6435	Extend class notation with Russell's definition description binder (inverted iota).
class (℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	iotajust 6436*	Soundness justification theorem for df-iota 6437. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 29-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}} = ∪ {𝑧 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑧}}
Definition	df-iota 6437*	Define Russell's definition description binder, which can be read as "the unique 𝑥 such that 𝜑", where 𝜑 ordinarily contains 𝑥 as a free variable. Our definition is meaningful only when there is exactly one 𝑥 such that 𝜑 is true (see iotaval 6455); otherwise, it evaluates to the empty set (see iotanul 6461). Russell used the inverted iota symbol ℩ to represent the binder. Sometimes proofs need to expand an iota-based definition. That is, given "X = the x for which ... x ... x ..." holds, the proof needs to get to "... X ... X ...". A general strategy to do this is to use riotacl2 7319 (or iotacl 6467 for unbounded iota), as demonstrated in the proof of supub 9343. This can be easier than applying riotasbc 7321 or a version that applies an explicit substitution, because substituting an iota into its own property always has a bound variable clash which must be first renamed or else guarded with NF. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦}}
Theorem	dfiota2 6438*	Alternate definition for descriptions. Definition 8.18 in [Quine] p. 56. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑦 ∣ ∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	nfiota1 6439	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	nfiotadw 6440*	Deduction version of nfiotaw 6441. Version of nfiotad 6442 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	nfiotaw 6441*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. Version of nfiota 6443 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	nfiotad 6442	Deduction version of nfiota 6443. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfiotadw 6440 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 18-Feb-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜓))
Theorem	nfiota 6443	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for the ℩ class. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker nfiotaw 6441 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(℩𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	cbviotaw 6444*	Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviota 6446 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) Avoid ax-13 2372. (Revised by GG, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviotavw 6445*	Change bound variables in a description binder. Version of cbviotav 6447 with a disjoint variable condition, which requires fewer axioms . (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (Revised by GG, 30-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviota 6446	Change bound variables in a description binder. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker cbviotaw 6444 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cbviotav 6447*	Change bound variables in a description binder. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker cbviotavw 6445 when possible. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	sb8iota 6448	Variable substitution in description binder. Compare sb8eu 2595. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iotaeq 6449	Equality theorem for descriptions. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑦𝜑))
Theorem	iotabi 6450	Equivalence theorem for descriptions. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 30-Jun-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓))
Theorem	uniabio 6451*	Part of Theorem 8.17 in [Quine] p. 56. This theorem serves as a lemma for the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotaval2 6452*	Version of iotaval 6455 using df-iota 6437 instead of dfiota2 6438. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotauni2 6453*	Version of iotauni 6458 using df-iota 6437 instead of dfiota2 6438. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotanul2 6454*	Version of iotanul 6461 using df-iota 6437 instead of dfiota2 6438. (Contributed by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (¬ ∃𝑦{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑦} → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	iotaval 6455*	Theorem 8.19 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the fundamental property of iota. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2144, ax-11 2160, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 23-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦) → (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑦)
Theorem	iotassuni 6456	The ℩ class is a subset of the union of all elements satisfying 𝜑. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2144, ax-11 2160, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) ⊆ ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	iotaex 6457	Theorem 8.23 in [Quine] p. 58. This theorem proves the existence of the ℩ class under our definition. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.) Remove dependency on ax-10 2144, ax-11 2160, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 6-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ V
Theorem	iotauni 6458	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iotaint 6459	Equivalence between two different forms of ℩. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∩ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota1 6460	Property of iota. (Contributed by NM, 23-Aug-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (𝜑 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝑥))
Theorem	iotanul 6461	Theorem 8.22 in [Quine] p. 57. This theorem is the result if there isn't exactly one 𝑥 that satisfies 𝜑. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) = ∅)
Theorem	iota4 6462	Theorem *14.22 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 190. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → [(℩𝑥𝜑) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota4an 6463	Theorem *14.23 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 191. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 12-Jul-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → [(℩𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) / 𝑥]𝜑)
Theorem	iota5 6464*	A method for computing iota. (Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝐴))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐴)
Theorem	iotabidv 6465*	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜓) = (℩𝑥𝜒))
Theorem	iotabii 6466	Formula-building deduction for iota. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Oct-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = (℩𝑥𝜓)
Theorem	iotacl 6467	Membership law for descriptions. This can be useful for expanding an unbounded iota-based definition (see df-iota 6437). If you have a bounded iota-based definition, riotacl2 7319 may be useful. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 1-Aug-2011.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → (℩𝑥𝜑) ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑})
Theorem	iota2df 6468	A condition that allows to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2d 6469*	A condition that allows to represent "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴. (Contributed by NM, 30-Dec-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐵) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜓) = 𝐵))
Theorem	iota2 6470*	The unique element such that 𝜑. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 1-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥𝜑) → (𝜓 ↔ (℩𝑥𝜑) = 𝐴))
Theorem	iotan0 6471*	Representation of "the unique element such that 𝜑 " with a class expression 𝐴 which is not the empty set (that means that "the unique element such that 𝜑 " exists). (Contributed by AV, 30-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝐴 = (℩𝑥𝜑)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	sniota 6472	A class abstraction with a unique member can be expressed as a singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2016.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {(℩𝑥𝜑)})
Theorem	dfiota4 6473	The ℩ operation using the if operator. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) (Proof shortened by JJ, 28-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (℩𝑥𝜑) = if(∃!𝑥𝜑, ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}, ∅)
Theorem	csbiota 6474*	Class substitution within a description binder. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(℩𝑦𝜑) = (℩𝑦[𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑)
2.3.16  Functions
Syntax	wfun 6475	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate. (Read: 𝐴 is a function.)
wff Fun 𝐴
Syntax	wfn 6476	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with a domain. (Read: 𝐴 is a function on 𝐵.)
wff 𝐴 Fn 𝐵
Syntax	wf 6477	Extend the definition of a wff to include the function predicate with domain and codomain. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 into 𝐵.)
wff 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵
Syntax	wf1 6478	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one into 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵
Syntax	wfo 6479	Extend the definition of a wff to include onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 onto 𝐵.) The notation ("onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵
Syntax	wf1o 6480	Extend the definition of a wff to include one-to-one onto functions. (Read: 𝐹 maps 𝐴 one-to-one onto 𝐵.) The notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow) is from Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27.
wff 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵
Syntax	cfv 6481	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴", or "𝐹 of 𝐴".
class (𝐹‘𝐴)
Syntax	wiso 6482	Extend the definition of a wff to include the isomorphism property. Read: "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵".
wff 𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)
Definition	df-fun 6483	Define predicate that determines if some class 𝐴 is a function. Definition 10.1 of [Quine] p. 65. For example, the expression Fun cos is true once we define cosine (df-cos 15974). This is not the same as defining a specific function's mapping, which is typically done using the format of cmpt 5172 with the maps-to notation (see df-mpt 5173 and df-mpo 7351). Contrast this predicate with the predicates to determine if some class is a function with a given domain (df-fn 6484), a function with a given domain and codomain (df-f 6485), a one-to-one function (df-f1 6486), an onto function (df-fo 6487), or a one-to-one onto function (df-f1o 6488). For alternate definitions, see dffun2 6491, dffun3 6493, dffun4 6494, dffun5 6495, dffun6 6492, dffun7 6508, dffun8 6509, and dffun9 6510. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∘ ◡𝐴) ⊆ I ))
Definition	df-fn 6484	Define a function with domain. Definition 6.15(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. For alternate definitions, see dffn2 6653, dffn3 6663, dffn4 6741, and dffn5 6880. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 Fn 𝐵 ↔ (Fun 𝐴 ∧ dom 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f 6485	Define a function (mapping) with domain and codomain. Definition 6.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is a function from 𝐴 to 𝐵". For alternate definitions, see dff2 7032, dff3 7033, and dff4 7034. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1 6486	Define a one-to-one function. For equivalent definitions see dff12 6718 and dff13 7188. Compare Definition 6.15(5) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow). A one-to-one function is also called an "injection" or an "injective function", 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is an injection from 𝐴 into 𝐵". Injections are precisely the monomorphisms in the category SetCat of sets and set functions, see setcmon 17991. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ Fun ◡𝐹))
Definition	df-fo 6487	Define an onto function. Definition 6.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("onto" under the arrow). For alternate definitions, see dffo2 6739, dffo3 7035, dffo4 7036, and dffo5 7037. An onto function is also called a "surjection" or a "surjective function", 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is a surjection from 𝐴 onto 𝐵". Surjections are precisely the epimorphisms in the category SetCat of sets and set functions, see setcepi 17992. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ran 𝐹 = 𝐵))
Definition	df-f1o 6488	Define a one-to-one onto function. For equivalent definitions see dff1o2 6768, dff1o3 6769, dff1o4 6771, and dff1o5 6772. Compare Definition 6.15(6) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27. We use their notation ("1-1" above the arrow and "onto" below the arrow). A one-to-one onto function is also called a "bijection" or a "bijective function", 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 can be read as "𝐹 is a bijection between 𝐴 and 𝐵". Bijections are precisely the isomorphisms in the category SetCat of sets and set functions, see setciso 17995. Therefore, two sets are called "isomorphic" if there is a bijection between them. According to isof1oidb 7258, two sets are isomorphic iff there is an isomorphism Isom regarding the identity relation. In this case, the two sets are also "equinumerous", see bren 8879. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ↔ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵))
Definition	df-fv 6489*	Define the value of a function, (𝐹‘𝐴), also known as function application. For example, (cos‘0) = 1 (we prove this in cos0 16056 after we define cosine in df-cos 15974). Typically, function 𝐹 is defined using maps-to notation (see df-mpt 5173 and df-mpo 7351), but this is not required. For example, 𝐹 = {⟨2, 6⟩, ⟨3, 9⟩} → (𝐹‘3) = 9 (ex-fv 30418). Note that df-ov 7349 will define two-argument functions using ordered pairs as (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = (𝐹‘⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩). This particular definition is quite convenient: it can be applied to any class and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6854 and fvprc 6814). The left apostrophe notation originated with Peano and was adopted in Definition *30.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 235, Definition 10.11 of [Quine] p. 68, and Definition 6.11 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 26. It means the same thing as the more familiar 𝐹(𝐴) notation for a function's value at 𝐴, i.e., "𝐹 of 𝐴", but without context-dependent notational ambiguity. Alternate definitions are dffv2 6917, dffv3 6818, fv2 6817, and fv3 6840 (the latter two previously required 𝐴 to be a set.) Restricted equivalents that require 𝐹 to be a function are shown in funfv 6909 and funfv2 6910. For the familiar definition of function value in terms of ordered pair membership, see funopfvb 6876. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.) Revised to use ℩. Original version is now Theorem dffv4 6819. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹‘𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-isom 6490*	Define the isomorphism predicate. We read this as "𝐻 is an 𝑅, 𝑆 isomorphism of 𝐴 onto 𝐵". Normally, 𝑅 and 𝑆 are ordering relations on 𝐴 and 𝐵 respectively. Definition 6.28 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 32, whose notation is the same as ours except that 𝑅 and 𝑆 are subscripts. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐻 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ↔ (𝐻:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥)𝑆(𝐻‘𝑦))))
Theorem	dffun2 6491*	Alternate definition of a function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) Avoid ax-10 2144, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 19-Dec-2024.) Avoid ax-11 2160. (Revised by BTernaryTau, 29-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥𝐴𝑦 ∧ 𝑥𝐴𝑧) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun6 6492*	Alternate definition of a function using "at most one" notation. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) Avoid ax-10 2144, ax-12 2180. (Revised by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 ↔ (Rel 𝐹 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	dffun3 6493*	Alternate definition of function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(𝑥𝐴𝑦 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun4 6494*	Alternate definition of a function. Definition 6.4(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 24. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun5 6495*	Alternate definition of function. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1996.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃𝑧∀𝑦(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑦 = 𝑧)))
Theorem	dffun6f 6496*	Definition of function, using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (Fun 𝐴 ↔ (Rel 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥∃*𝑦 𝑥𝐴𝑦))
Theorem	funmo 6497*	A function has at most one value for each argument. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by SN, 19-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → ∃*𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦)
Theorem	funrel 6498	A function is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐴 → Rel 𝐴)
Theorem	0nelfun 6499	A function does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (Fun 𝑅 → ∅ ∉ 𝑅)
Theorem	funss 6500	Subclass theorem for function predicate. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1994.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (Fun 𝐵 → Fun 𝐴))