Theorem sb5ALTVD 46003

Description: The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Unit 20 Excercise 3.a., which is sb5 2309, found in the "Answers to Starred Exercises" on page 457 of "Understanding Symbolic Logic", Fifth Edition (2008), by Virginia Klenk. The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. sb5ALT 45616 is sb5ALTVD 46003 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from sb5ALTVD 46003.

1::	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
2::	⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
3:1,2:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
4:3:	⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   )
5:4:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )
6::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
7::	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
8:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝜑   )
9:7:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
10:8,9:	⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
101::	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
11:101,10:	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 )
12:5,11:	⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑 )) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
qed:12:	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) )

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sb5ALTVD	⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sb5ALTVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 45665	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
2		equsb1 2520	. . . . . 6 ⊢ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦
3		sban 2116	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
4	3	simplbi2com 508	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
5	1, 2, 4	e10 45785	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
6		spsbe 2118	. . . . 5 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
7	5, 6	e1a 45718	. . . 4 ⊢ (   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   ▶   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
8	7	in1 45662	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))
9		hbs1 2307	. . . 4 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∀𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
10		idn2 45704	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   )
11		simpr 490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜑)
12	10, 11	e2 45722	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝜑   )
13		simpl 488	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
14	10, 13	e2 45722	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   𝑥 = 𝑦   )
15		sbequ1 2283	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
16	15	com12 33	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
17	12, 14, 16	e22 45762	. . . 4 ⊢ (   ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ,   (𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)   ▶   [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑   )
18	9, 17	exinst 45715	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
19	8, 18	pm3.2i 476	. 2 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
20		impbi 211	. . 3 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) → ((∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))))
21	20	imp 412	. 2 ⊢ ((([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)) ∧ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑) → [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑)))
22	19, 21	e0a 45862	1 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝜑))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569  ∃wex 1811  [wsb 2098

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-10 2177  ax-12 2212  ax-13 2401

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-vd1 45661  df-vd2 45669

This theorem is used by: (None)