Theorem sbcie3s 17349

Description: A special version of class substitution commonly used for structures. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Mar-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbcie3s.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)
sbcie3s.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑊)
sbcie3s.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐺‘𝑊)
sbcie3s.1	⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbcie3s	⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎][(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏][(𝐺‘𝑤) / 𝑐]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,𝑤   𝐸,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐   𝐹,𝑏,𝑐   𝐺,𝑐   𝑊,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐   𝜑,𝑎,𝑏,𝑐

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑤)   𝜓(𝑤, 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐)   𝐴(𝑤, 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐)   𝐵(𝑤, 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐)   𝐶(𝑤, 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐)   𝐸(𝑤)   𝐹(𝑤, 𝑎)   𝐺(𝑤, 𝑎, 𝑏)   𝑊(𝑤)

Proof of Theorem sbcie3s

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fvexd 6905	. 2 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝐸‘𝑤) ∈ V)
2		fvexd 6905	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) → (𝐹‘𝑤) ∈ V)
3		fvexd 6905	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) → (𝐺‘𝑤) ∈ V)
4		simpllr 788	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤))
5		fveq2 6890	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝐸‘𝑤) = (𝐸‘𝑊))
6	5	ad3antrrr 743	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → (𝐸‘𝑤) = (𝐸‘𝑊))
7	4, 6	eqtrd 2795	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑊))
8		sbcie3s.a	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐴 = (𝐸‘𝑊)
9	7, 8	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑎 = 𝐴)
10		simplr 781	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤))
11		fveq2 6890	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘𝑊))
12	11	ad3antrrr 743	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → (𝐹‘𝑤) = (𝐹‘𝑊))
13	10, 12	eqtrd 2795	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑊))
14		sbcie3s.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐹‘𝑊)
15	13, 14	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑏 = 𝐵)
16		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤))
17		fveq2 6890	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
18	17	ad3antrrr 743	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → (𝐺‘𝑤) = (𝐺‘𝑊))
19	16, 18	eqtrd 2795	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑊))
20		sbcie3s.c	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐺‘𝑊)
21	19, 20	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → 𝑐 = 𝐶)
22		sbcie3s.1	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 = 𝐶) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
23	9, 15, 21, 22	syl3anc 1398	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
24	23	bicomd 226	. . . 4 ⊢ ((((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑐 = (𝐺‘𝑤)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
25	3, 24	sbcied 3781	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) ∧ 𝑏 = (𝐹‘𝑤)) → ([(𝐺‘𝑤) / 𝑐]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
26	2, 25	sbcied 3781	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑤 = 𝑊 ∧ 𝑎 = (𝐸‘𝑤)) → ([(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏][(𝐺‘𝑤) / 𝑐]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))
27	1, 26	sbcied 3781	1 ⊢ (𝑤 = 𝑊 → ([(𝐸‘𝑤) / 𝑎][(𝐹‘𝑤) / 𝑏][(𝐺‘𝑤) / 𝑐]𝜓 ↔ 𝜑))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569  Vcvv 3450  [wsbc 3738  ‘cfv 6543

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-ext 2732  ax-nul 5259

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2099  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-ne 2956  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-iota 6497  df-fv 6551

This theorem is used by:  istrkgcb  28927  istrkgld  28930  legval  29056  istrkg2d  35345  afsval  35353