Theorem sbhypf 3527

Description: Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf 3907. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jan-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbhypf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
sbhypf.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbhypf	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbhypf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbhypf.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	sbimi 2073	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 → [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3		eqsb1 2859	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
4		sbhypf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	4	sbf 2270	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)
6	5	sblbis 2308	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	2, 3, 6	3imtr3i 291	1 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   = wceq 1539  Ⅎwnf 1782  [wsb 2063

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1794  ax-4 1808  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2006  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2140  ax-12 2176  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1779  df-nf 1783  df-sb 2064  df-cleq 2726

This theorem is referenced by:  mob2  3703  reu2eqd  3724  cbvrabcsfw  3920  cbvopab1  5197  ralxpf  5837  cbviotaw  6501  cbvriotaw  7379  tfisi  7862  ac6sf  10511  nn0ind-raph  12701  ac6sf2  32569  nn0min  32762  ac6gf  37698  fdc1  37712