Theorem sbhypf 3496

Description: Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf 3866. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbhypf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
sbhypf.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbhypf	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbhypf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
2	1	equsexvw 2006	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
3		nfs1v 2151	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
4		sbhypf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	3, 4	nfbi 1904	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
6		sbequ12 2242	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
7	6	bicomd 222	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
8		sbhypf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	7, 8	sylan9bb 511	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
10	5, 9	exlimi 2208	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	2, 10	sylbir 234	1 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783  [wsb 2065

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-cleq 2728

This theorem is referenced by:  mob2  3655  reu2eqd  3676  cbvrabcsfw  3881  cbvopab1  5156  ralxpf  5768  cbviotaw  6417  cbvriotaw  7273  tfisi  7737  ac6sf  10295  nn0ind-raph  12470  ac6sf2  31009  nn0min  31183  ac6gf  35938  fdc1  35952