Theorem sbhypf 3513

Description: Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf 3880. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Jan-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbhypf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
sbhypf.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbhypf	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbhypf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sbhypf.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	sbimi 2107	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 → [𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
3		eqsb1 2888	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
4		sbhypf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	4	sbf 2305	. . 3 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓 ↔ 𝜓)
6	5	sblbis 2342	. 2 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥](𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
7	2, 3, 6	3imtr3i 293	1 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   = wceq 1560  Ⅎwnf 1803  [wsb 2090

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-cleq 2754

This theorem is referenced by:  mob2  3678  reu2eqd  3699  cbvrabcsfw  3893  cbvopab1  5174  cbvmptf  5200  ralxpf  5818  cbviotaw  6484  cbvriotaw  7362  tfisi  7839  ac6sf  10446  nn0ind-raph  12673  ac6sf2  32824  nn0min  33023  ac6gf  38231  fdc1  38245