Theorem sbhypf 3489

Description: Introduce an explicit substitution into an implicit substitution hypothesis. See also csbhypf 3865. (Contributed by Raph Levien, 10-Apr-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sbhypf.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
sbhypf.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sbhypf	⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem sbhypf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqeq1 2743	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
2	1	equsexvw 2011	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐴)
3		nfs1v 2156	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑
4		sbhypf.1	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
5	3, 4	nfbi 1909	. . 3 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)
6		sbequ12 2247	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑))
7	6	bicomd 222	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜑))
8		sbhypf.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
9	7, 8	sylan9bb 509	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
10	5, 9	exlimi 2213	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	2, 10	sylbir 234	1 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1541  ∃wex 1785  Ⅎwnf 1789  [wsb 2070

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1801  ax-4 1815  ax-5 1916  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2014  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2140  ax-12 2174  ax-ext 2710

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1786  df-nf 1790  df-sb 2071  df-cleq 2731

This theorem is referenced by:  mob2  3653  reu2eqd  3674  cbvrabcsfw  3880  cbvopab1  5153  ralxpf  5752  cbviotaw  6395  cbvriotaw  7234  tfisi  7693  ac6sf  10229  nn0ind-raph  12403  ac6sf2  30939  nn0min  31113  ac6gf  35869  fdc1  35883