Theorem cbvopab1 5156

Description: Change first bound variable in an ordered-pair class abstraction, using explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.) Add disjoint variable condition to avoid ax-13 2370. See cbvopab1g 5157 for a less restrictive version requiring more axioms. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 17-Jan-2024.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
cbvopab1.1	⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
cbvopab1.2	⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
cbvopab1.3	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cbvopab1	⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝜓(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem cbvopab1

Dummy variables 𝑤 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfv 1915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
2		nfv 1915	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩
3		nfs1v 2151	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥[𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑
4	2, 3	nfan 1900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
5	4	nfex 2316	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
6		opeq1 4809	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩)
7	6	eqeq2d 2747	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩))
8		sbequ12 2242	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (𝜑 ↔ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑))
9	7, 8	anbi12d 632	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
10	9	exbidv 1922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑣 → (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)))
11	1, 5, 10	cbvexv1 2337	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑))
12		nfv 1915	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩
13		cbvopab1.1	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧𝜑
14	13	nfsbv 2322	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧[𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑
15	12, 14	nfan 1900	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
16	15	nfex 2316	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑)
17		nfv 1915	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)
18		opeq1 4809	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩)
19	18	eqeq2d 2747	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → (𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ↔ 𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩))
20		cbvopab1.2	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓
21		cbvopab1.3	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
22	20, 21	sbhypf 3496	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ([𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
23	19, 22	anbi12d 632	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → ((𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
24	23	exbidv 1922	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑣 = 𝑧 → (∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)))
25	16, 17, 24	cbvexv1 2337	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑣∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑣, 𝑦⟩ ∧ [𝑣 / 𝑥]𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
26	11, 25	bitri 275	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
27	26	abbii 2806	. 2 ⊢ {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
28		df-opab 5144	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑)}
29		df-opab 5144	. 2 ⊢ {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} = {𝑤 ∣ ∃𝑧∃𝑦(𝑤 = ⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓)}
30	27, 28, 29	3eqtr4i 2774	1 ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑧, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1539  ∃wex 1779  Ⅎwnf 1783  [wsb 2065  {cab 2713  ⟨cop 4571  {copab 5143

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2814  df-rab 3287  df-v 3439  df-dif 3895  df-un 3897  df-in 3899  df-ss 3909  df-nul 4263  df-if 4466  df-sn 4566  df-pr 4568  df-op 4572  df-opab 5144

This theorem is referenced by:  cbvopab1vOLD  5161  cbvmptf  5190  phpreu  35805  poimirlem26  35847  mbfposadd  35868