Theorem suctrALTcfVD 41629

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 41275) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 41628 is suctrALTcfVD 41629 without virtual deductions and was derived automatically from suctrALTcfVD 41629. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
2::	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4::	⊢ (   ................................... ....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
5:1,3,4:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
6::	⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7:5,6:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
9::	⊢ (   ................................... ...... 𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
10:3,9:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
11:10,6:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12:11:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13:2:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
14:13:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
15:8,12,14:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALTcfVD	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALTcfVD

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6236	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		idn1 41280	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
3		idn1 41280	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
4		simpl 486	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5	3, 4	el1 41334	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
6		idn1 41280	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
7		trel 5143	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	3impib 1113	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
9	2, 5, 6, 8	el123 41470	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
10		ssel2 3910	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
11	1, 9, 10	el0321old 41423	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12	11	int3 41318	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13		idn1 41280	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
14		eleq2 2878	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
15	14	biimpac 482	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
16	5, 13, 15	el12 41432	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
17	1, 16, 10	el021old 41407	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
18	17	int2 41312	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
19		simpr 488	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20	3, 19	el1 41334	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
21		elsuci 6225	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
22	20, 21	el1 41334	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
23		jao 958	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)))
24	23	3imp 1108	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
25	12, 18, 22, 24	el2122old 41425	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
26	25	int2 41312	. . . 4 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
27	26	gen12 41324	. . 3 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
28		dftr2 5138	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
29	28	biimpri 231	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
30	27, 29	el1 41334	. 2 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
31	30	in1 41277	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   ∨ wo 844  ∀wal 1536   = wceq 1538   ∈ wcel 2111   ⊆ wss 3881  Tr wtr 5136  suc csuc 6161

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2113  ax-9 2121  ax-ext 2770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 400  df-or 845  df-3an 1086  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2070  df-clab 2777  df-cleq 2791  df-clel 2870  df-v 3443  df-un 3886  df-in 3888  df-ss 3898  df-sn 4526  df-uni 4801  df-tr 5137  df-suc 6165  df-vd1 41276  df-vhc2 41287  df-vhc3 41295

This theorem is referenced by: (None)