Theorem suctrALTcfVD 44947

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 44594) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 44946 is suctrALTcfVD 44947 without virtual deductions and was derived automatically from suctrALTcfVD 44947. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
2::	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4::	⊢ (   ................................... ....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
5:1,3,4:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
6::	⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7:5,6:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
9::	⊢ (   ................................... ...... 𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
10:3,9:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
11:10,6:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12:11:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13:2:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
14:13:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
15:8,12,14:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALTcfVD	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALTcfVD

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6434	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		idn1 44599	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
3		idn1 44599	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
4		simpl 482	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5	3, 4	el1 44653	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
6		idn1 44599	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
7		trel 5238	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	3impib 1116	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
9	2, 5, 6, 8	el123 44788	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
10		ssel2 3953	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
11	1, 9, 10	el0321old 44741	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12	11	int3 44637	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13		idn1 44599	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
14		eleq2 2823	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
15	14	biimpac 478	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
16	5, 13, 15	el12 44750	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
17	1, 16, 10	el021old 44726	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
18	17	int2 44631	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
19		simpr 484	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20	3, 19	el1 44653	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
21		elsuci 6421	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
22	20, 21	el1 44653	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
23		jao 962	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)))
24	23	3imp 1110	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
25	12, 18, 22, 24	el2122old 44743	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
26	25	int2 44631	. . . 4 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
27	26	gen12 44643	. . 3 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
28		dftr2 5231	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
29	28	biimpri 228	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
30	27, 29	el1 44653	. 2 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
31	30	in1 44596	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   ∨ wo 847  ∀wal 1538   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108   ⊆ wss 3926  Tr wtr 5229  suc csuc 6354

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2707

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-ex 1780  df-sb 2065  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-v 3461  df-un 3931  df-ss 3943  df-sn 4602  df-uni 4884  df-tr 5230  df-suc 6358  df-vd1 44595  df-vhc2 44606  df-vhc3 44614

This theorem is referenced by: (None)