Theorem suctrALTcfVD 45753

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45400) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 45752 is suctrALTcfVD 45753 without virtual deductions and was derived automatically from suctrALTcfVD 45753. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
2::	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4::	⊢ (   ................................... ....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
5:1,3,4:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
6::	⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7:5,6:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
9::	⊢ (   ................................... ...... 𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
10:3,9:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
11:10,6:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12:11:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13:2:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
14:13:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
15:8,12,14:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALTcfVD	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALTcfVD

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6444	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		idn1 45405	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
3		idn1 45405	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
4		simpl 488	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5	3, 4	el1 45459	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
6		idn1 45405	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
7		trel 5224	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	3impib 1134	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
9	2, 5, 6, 8	el123 45594	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
10		ssel2 3929	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
11	1, 9, 10	el0321old 45547	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12	11	int3 45443	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13		idn1 45405	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
14		eleq2 2851	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
15	14	biimpac 484	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
16	5, 13, 15	el12 45556	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
17	1, 16, 10	el021old 45532	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
18	17	int2 45437	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
19		simpr 490	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20	3, 19	el1 45459	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
21		elsuci 6431	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
22	20, 21	el1 45459	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
23		jao 975	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)))
24	23	3imp 1128	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
25	12, 18, 22, 24	el2122old 45549	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
26	25	int2 45437	. . . 4 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
27	26	gen12 45449	. . 3 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
28		dftr2 5218	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
29	28	biimpri 231	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
30	27, 29	el1 45459	. 2 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
31	30	in1 45402	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3902  Tr wtr 5216  suc csuc 6363

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-v 3455  df-un 3907  df-ss 3919  df-sn 4588  df-uni 4871  df-tr 5217  df-suc 6367  df-vd1 45401  df-vhc2 45412  df-vhc3 45420

This theorem is used by: (None)