Theorem suctrALTcfVD 45611

Description: The following User's Proof is a Virtual Deduction proof (see wvd1 45258) using conjunction-form virtual hypothesis collections. The conjunction-form version of completeusersproof.cmd. It allows the User to avoid superflous virtual hypotheses. This proof was completed automatically by a tools program which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. suctrALTcf 45610 is suctrALTcfVD 45611 without virtual deductions and was derived automatically from suctrALTcfVD 45611. The version of completeusersproof.cmd used is capable of only generating conjunction-form unification theorems, not unification deductions. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 13-Jun-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

1::	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
2::	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
3:2:	⊢ (   ......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
4::	⊢ (   ................................... ....... 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
5:1,3,4:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
6::	⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
7:5,6:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) , 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
9::	⊢ (   ................................... ...... 𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
10:3,9:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
11:10,6:	⊢ (   ........ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴), 𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12:11:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13:2:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
14:13:	⊢ (   .......... (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
15:8,12,14:	⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)    )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
16:15:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
17:16:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
18:17:	⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
qed:18:	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
suctrALTcfVD	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Proof of Theorem suctrALTcfVD

Dummy variables 𝑧 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sssucid 6445	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴
2		idn1 45263	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr 𝐴   )
3		idn1 45263	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
4		simpl 487	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)
5	3, 4	el1 45317	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝑦   )
6		idn1 45263	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )
7		trel 5227	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
8	7	3impib 1134	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((Tr 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
9	2, 5, 6, 8	el123 45452	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
10		ssel2 3933	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
11	1, 9, 10	el0321old 45405	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 ∈ 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
12	11	int3 45301	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
13		idn1 45263	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (   𝑦 = 𝐴   ▶   𝑦 = 𝐴   )
14		eleq2 2852	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴))
15	14	biimpac 483	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)
16	5, 13, 15	el12 45414	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ 𝐴   )
17	1, 16, 10	el021old 45390	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ,   𝑦 = 𝐴   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
18	17	int2 45295	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
19		simpr 489	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)
20	3, 19	el1 45317	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
21		elsuci 6432	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴))
22	20, 21	el1 45317	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   ▶   (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)   )
23		jao 975	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)))
24	23	3imp 1128	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 = 𝐴 → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝐴)) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)
25	12, 18, 22, 24	el2122old 45407	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (   Tr 𝐴   ,   (𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )   ▶   𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴   )
26	25	int2 45295	. . . 4 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
27	26	gen12 45307	. . 3 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴)   )
28		dftr2 5221	. . . 4 ⊢ (Tr suc 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴))
29	28	biimpri 231	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑧∀𝑦((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝑧 ∈ suc 𝐴) → Tr suc 𝐴)
30	27, 29	el1 45317	. 2 ⊢ (   Tr 𝐴   ▶   Tr suc 𝐴   )
31	30	in1 45260	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 → Tr suc 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143   ⊆ wss 3906  Tr wtr 5219  suc csuc 6364

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-ext 2735

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1810  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-v 3457  df-un 3911  df-ss 3923  df-sn 4591  df-uni 4874  df-tr 5220  df-suc 6368  df-vd1 45259  df-vhc2 45270  df-vhc3 45278

This theorem is referenced by: (None)