Theorem dftr2 5225

Description: An alternate way of defining a transitive class. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. Using dftr2c 5226 instead may avoid dependences on ax-11 2195. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftr2	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Proof of Theorem dftr2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3925	. 2 ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2		df-tr 5224	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)
3		19.23v 1975	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eluni 4880	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	imbi1i 352	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	3, 5	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	albii 1852	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
8	1, 2, 7	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146   ⊆ wss 3908  ∪ cuni 4877  Tr wtr 5223

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-v 3460  df-ss 3925  df-uni 4878  df-tr 5224

This theorem is used by:  dftr2c  5226  trel  5231  ordelord  6389  suctr  6456  trom  7880  hartogs  9516  card2on  9526  trcl  9707  tskwe  9955  ondomon  10565  nosupno  27904  noinfno  27919  bdayons  28506  dftr6  36264  elpotr  36292  hftr  36695  ttctr  37045  dfttc2g  37058  dfttc4lem2  37081  dford4  43797  mnutrd  45031  tratrb  45286  trsbc  45290  truniALT  45291  sspwtr  45570  sspwtrALT  45571  sspwtrALT2  45572  pwtrVD  45573  pwtrrVD  45574  suctrALT  45575  suctrALT2VD  45585  suctrALT2  45586  tratrbVD  45610  trsbcVD  45626  truniALTVD  45627  trintALTVD  45629  trintALT  45630  suctrALTcf  45671  suctrALTcfVD  45672  suctrALT3  45673