Theorem dftr2 5218

Description: An alternate way of defining a transitive class. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. Using dftr2c 5219 instead may avoid dependences on ax-11 2194. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftr2	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Proof of Theorem dftr2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3919	. 2 ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2		df-tr 5217	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)
3		19.23v 1975	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eluni 4873	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	imbi1i 352	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	3, 5	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	albii 1852	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
8	1, 2, 7	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3902  ∪ cuni 4870  Tr wtr 5216

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-v 3455  df-ss 3919  df-uni 4871  df-tr 5217

This theorem is used by:  dftr2c  5219  trel  5224  ordelord  6383  suctr  6450  trom  7875  hartogs  9520  card2on  9530  trcl  9711  tskwe  9959  ondomon  10575  nosupno  27947  noinfno  27962  bdayons  28549  dftr6  36338  elpotr  36366  hftr  36770  ttctr  37120  dfttc2g  37133  dfttc4lem2  37156  dford4  43878  mnutrd  45112  tratrb  45367  trsbc  45371  truniALT  45372  sspwtr  45651  sspwtrALT  45652  sspwtrALT2  45653  pwtrVD  45654  pwtrrVD  45655  suctrALT  45656  suctrALT2VD  45666  suctrALT2  45667  tratrbVD  45691  trsbcVD  45707  truniALTVD  45708  trintALTVD  45710  trintALT  45711  suctrALTcf  45752  suctrALTcfVD  45753  suctrALT3  45754