Theorem dftr2 5214

Description: An alternate way of defining a transitive class. Exercise 7 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 40. Using dftr2c 5215 instead may avoid dependences on ax-11 2194. (Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-1994.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dftr2	⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐴

Proof of Theorem dftr2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-ss 3916	. 2 ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
2		df-tr 5213	. 2 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐴)
3		19.23v 1975	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
4		eluni 4870	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴))
5	4	imbi1i 352	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (∃𝑦(𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
6	3, 5	bitr4i 281	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
7	6	albii 1852	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
8	1, 2, 7	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (Tr 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145   ⊆ wss 3899  ∪ cuni 4867  Tr wtr 5212

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-tru 1573  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-v 3453  df-ss 3916  df-uni 4868  df-tr 5213

This theorem is used by:  dftr2c  5215  trel  5220  ordelord  6377  suctr  6444  trom  7875  hartogs  9522  card2on  9532  trcl  9713  tskwe  10012  ondomon  10628  nosupno  28042  noinfno  28057  bdayons  28644  dftr6  36485  elpotr  36513  hftr  36903  ttctr  37251  dfttc2g  37264  dfttc4lem2  37287  dford4  43989  mnutrd  45223  tratrb  45478  trsbc  45482  truniALT  45483  sspwtr  45762  sspwtrALT  45763  sspwtrALT2  45764  pwtrVD  45765  pwtrrVD  45766  suctrALT  45767  suctrALT2VD  45777  suctrALT2  45778  tratrbVD  45802  trsbcVD  45818  truniALTVD  45819  trintALTVD  45821  trintALT  45822  suctrALTcf  45863  suctrALTcfVD  45864  suctrALT3  45865