MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  swopo Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem swopo 5570
Description: A strict weak order is a partial order. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Jul-2014.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
swopo.1 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
swopo.2 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
swopo (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)
Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝐴   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦,𝑧

Proof of Theorem swopo
StepHypRef Expression
1 id 23 . . . . 5 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)
21ancli 558 . . . 4 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴))
3 swopo.1 . . . . 5 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
43ralrimivva 3206 . . . 4 (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
5 breq1 5106 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
6 breq2 5107 . . . . . . 7 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))
76notbid 321 . . . . . 6 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))
85, 7imbi12d 347 . . . . 5 (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))
9 breq2 5107 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
10 breq1 5106 . . . . . . 7 (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
1110notbid 321 . . . . . 6 (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
129, 11imbi12d 347 . . . . 5 (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((𝑥𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑥𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)))
138, 12rspc2va 3588 . . . 4 (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
142, 4, 13syl2anr 609 . . 3 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑥𝑅𝑥 → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥))
1514pm2.01d 192 . 2 ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥)
1633adantr1 1188 . . 3 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑦𝑅𝑧 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
17 swopo.2 . . . . . . 7 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑥𝑅𝑦 → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑧𝑅𝑦)))
1817imp 412 . . . . . 6 (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → (𝑥𝑅𝑧 ∨ 𝑧𝑅𝑦))
1918orcomd 885 . . . . 5 (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
2019ord 878 . . . 4 (((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
2120expimpd 459 . . 3 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
2216, 21sylan2d 617 . 2 ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧))
2315, 22ispod 5568 1 (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴)
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   ∧ w3a 1103   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077   class class class wbr 5103   Po wpo 5557
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-ral 3078  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-br 5104  df-po 5559
This theorem is used by:  swoer  8749  swoso  8752
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator