Theorem bj-d0clsepcl 16641

Description: Δ₀-classical logic and separation implies classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) New usage is discouraged since this statement is not intuitionnistic. (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-d0clsepcl	|- DECID ph

Proof of Theorem bj-d0clsepcl

Dummy variables x a are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 4221	. . . . . . 7 |- (/) e. _V
2	1	bj-snex 16629	. . . . . 6 |- { (/) } e. _V
3	2	zfauscl 4214	. . . . 5 |- E. a A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
4		eleq1 2294	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = (/) -> ( x e. a <-> (/) e. a ) )
5		eleq1 2294	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = (/) -> ( x e. { (/) } <-> (/) e. { (/) } ) )
6	5	anbi1d 465	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) )
7	4, 6	bibi12d 235	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ( x e. a <-> ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) <-> ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) ) )
8	1, 7	spcv 2901	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) -> ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) )
9	3, 8	eximii 1651	. . . 4 |- E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
10	1	snid 3704	. . . . . . . 8 |- (/) e. { (/) }
11	10	biantrur 303	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ph <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
12	11	bicomi 132	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) <-> ph )
13	12	bibi2i 227	. . . . 5 |- ( ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) <-> ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) )
14	13	exbii 1654	. . . 4 |- ( E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) <-> E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) )
15	9, 14	mpbi 145	. . 3 |- E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ph )
16		bj-bd0el 16584	. . . . 5 |- BOUNDED (/) e. a
17	16	ax-bj-d0cl 16640	. . . 4 |- DECID (/) e. a
18		dcbiit 847	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) -> (DECID (/) e. a <-> DECID ph ) )
19	17, 18	mpbii 148	. . 3 |- ( ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) -> DECID ph )
20	15, 19	eximii 1651	. 2 |- E. aDECID ph
21		bj-ex 16480	. 2 |- ( E. aDECID ph -> DECID ph )
22	20, 21	ax-mp 5	1 |- DECID ph

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 842   A.wal 1396   = wceq 1398   E.wex 1541   e. wcel 2202   (/)c0 3496   {csn 3673

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-nul 4220  ax-pr 4305  ax-bd0 16529  ax-bdim 16530  ax-bdor 16532  ax-bdn 16533  ax-bdal 16534  ax-bdex 16535  ax-bdeq 16536  ax-bdsep 16600  ax-bj-d0cl 16640

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 843  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-v 2805  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-bdc 16557

This theorem is referenced by: (None)