Theorem bj-d0clsepcl 16060

Description: Δ₀-classical logic and separation implies classical logic. (Contributed by BJ, 2-Jan-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-d0clsepcl	|- DECID ph

Proof of Theorem bj-d0clsepcl

Dummy variables x a are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 4187	. . . . . . 7 |- (/) e. _V
2	1	bj-snex 16048	. . . . . 6 |- { (/) } e. _V
3	2	zfauscl 4180	. . . . 5 |- E. a A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
4		eleq1 2270	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = (/) -> ( x e. a <-> (/) e. a ) )
5		eleq1 2270	. . . . . . . 8 |- ( x = (/) -> ( x e. { (/) } <-> (/) e. { (/) } ) )
6	5	anbi1d 465	. . . . . . 7 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) )
7	4, 6	bibi12d 235	. . . . . 6 |- ( x = (/) -> ( ( x e. a <-> ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) <-> ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) ) )
8	1, 7	spcv 2874	. . . . 5 |- ( A. x ( x e. a <-> ( x e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) -> ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) )
9	3, 8	eximii 1626	. . . 4 |- E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
10	1	snid 3674	. . . . . . . 8 |- (/) e. { (/) }
11	10	biantrur 303	. . . . . . 7 |- ( ph <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) )
12	11	bicomi 132	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) <-> ph )
13	12	bibi2i 227	. . . . 5 |- ( ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) <-> ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) )
14	13	exbii 1629	. . . 4 |- ( E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ( (/) e. { (/) } /\ ph ) ) <-> E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) )
15	9, 14	mpbi 145	. . 3 |- E. a ( (/) e. a <-> ph )
16		bj-bd0el 16003	. . . . 5 |- BOUNDED (/) e. a
17	16	ax-bj-d0cl 16059	. . . 4 |- DECID (/) e. a
18		dcbiit 841	. . . 4 |- ( ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) -> (DECID (/) e. a <-> DECID ph ) )
19	17, 18	mpbii 148	. . 3 |- ( ( (/) e. a <-> ph ) -> DECID ph )
20	15, 19	eximii 1626	. 2 |- E. aDECID ph
21		bj-ex 15898	. 2 |- ( E. aDECID ph -> DECID ph )
22	20, 21	ax-mp 5	1 |- DECID ph

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 836   A.wal 1371   = wceq 1373   E.wex 1516   e. wcel 2178   (/)c0 3468   {csn 3643

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 615  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1471  ax-7 1472  ax-gen 1473  ax-ie1 1517  ax-ie2 1518  ax-8 1528  ax-10 1529  ax-11 1530  ax-i12 1531  ax-bndl 1533  ax-4 1534  ax-17 1550  ax-i9 1554  ax-ial 1558  ax-i5r 1559  ax-14 2181  ax-ext 2189  ax-sep 4178  ax-nul 4186  ax-pr 4269  ax-bd0 15948  ax-bdim 15949  ax-bdor 15951  ax-bdn 15952  ax-bdal 15953  ax-bdex 15954  ax-bdeq 15955  ax-bdsep 16019  ax-bj-d0cl 16059

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 837  df-tru 1376  df-fal 1379  df-nf 1485  df-sb 1787  df-clab 2194  df-cleq 2200  df-clel 2203  df-nfc 2339  df-ral 2491  df-rex 2492  df-v 2778  df-dif 3176  df-un 3178  df-in 3180  df-ss 3187  df-nul 3469  df-sn 3649  df-pr 3650  df-bdc 15976

This theorem is referenced by: (None)